The Priest Who Discovered The Big Bang

in #science6 years ago

Lemaitre.png

If you had asked me yesterday could a devout Catholic priest also be a physicist espousing the Big Bang theory and cosmic expansion. I would probably have said no; however today, thanks to the Google Doodle featuring Georges Lemaitre I have been completely disabused of that notion.

Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître (1894-1966) was the first physicist to derive Hubble's Law and also work on what was later to become known as Hubble's Constant.

It may seem strange that they were not called Lemaitre's Law and Lemaitre's Constant, however he published his theory in a little known Belgium magazine and so his thoughts were not given much attention by the wider physics community.

Growing Up In The Golden Age

Lemaitre grew up in a time when it could easily be argued that physics was experiencing its own renaissance. From the discovery of X-rays one year after the birth of Lemaitre in 1895. Through to the work of Max Planck, Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein, physics was enjoying a blossoming period full of new discoveries and theories.

For any physicist it would have been a very exciting time to be involved in science. Indeed the scientists of that period were very much the rock stars of their generation.

Lemaitre gained his doctorate in 1920 and was ordained as a priest in 1923, in the same year he travelled to Cambridge, England where he became involved in astronomy, and began working on his theory of an expanding universe.

It was four years later in 1927 whereby he announced his findings, however Einstein whose model of the universe was static, rejected Lamaitre's ideas, saying; "Your calculations are correct, but your physics is atrocious."

However Einstein remained a respected peer, and in fact Lemaitre presented his doctoral thesis at MIT in order to gain his PHD, called The gravitational field in a fluid sphere of uniform invariant density according to the theory of relativity.

Hubble's Glory

Even though Edwin Hubble published his findings after Georges Lemaitre, he is the one who got all the credit and a physical law named after him.

This wasn't just because Hubble was easier to pronounce than Lemaitre (though these things sometimes do play a apart), it was that Hubble, along with Einstein, resided in America where all the action was taking place.

Science And The Catholic Church

It is difficult to know just how devout a Catholic Georges Lemaitre was, however we do know that he saw no conflict between his science and his religion.

This is something that fascinates me, because whilst scientific discoveries don't necessarily disprove the existence of a deity. They definitely do so when it comes to creation myths in various religions; for instance it is demonstrably false that the universe is 6000-10000 years old. Or that the earth is at the centre of the whole shebang. Or that rain water is different from sea water, or the light of the stars is different from the light of the sun.

These facts make it even more surprising in 1951 that Pope Pius XII tried to use Lemaitre's theories as a validation for Catholic doctrine. The Pope was later persuaded not to mention creationism publicly again by the Vatican's scientific adviser Daniel O'Connell.

O'Connell realised the dangers for religion by creating the God of the gaps, whereby God is pushed further and further back into pockets of human ignorance. Only to find that it has to move again once that very ignorance turns to enlightenment.

Lemaitre's Big Bang

Lemaitre's original theory of a *"Primeval Atom", which was later derisively dismissed as "A Big Bang" by the static universe astronomer Fred Hoyle, was at first dismissed by the physics community.

However after Einstein, who was at first also dismissive of Lemaitre's theory, encouraged him to carry on his work, the idea began to take hold.

Public Recognition

It was in 1932 at a Solvay Conference (a conference for physics and chemistry) that Albert Einstein was reported to have stood up applauded and declared; "This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened."

Although there was later dispute as to whether Einstein was referring to Lemaitre's whole theory, or just the part where he refers to cosmic rays being leftover radiation from the big bang. By that point it didn't matter, he had been endorsed by Einstein himself, which meant it was time for the rest for the world to acknowledge his achievements.

Lemaitre died in 1966 at the age of 72, however not before learning about the discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation, which provided further evidence for his proposal about the birth of the universe.

Thus unlike many theoretical physicists from his time, he actually got to see his life work validated and therefore it is not too far a stretch to say that he died a happy man.

DO YOU KNOW OF ANY OTHER GREAT SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES MADE BY RELIGIOUS MEN OR WOMEN? AS EVER, LET ME KNOW BELOW!

Sources:

Georges Lemaitre - Wiki

Timeline of fundamental physics discoveries - Wiki

Solvay Conference - Wiki

Title image: Public Domain

Cryptogee

Sort:  

Truth be told I think the notion that religious people didn't or don't mix with science is false. Quite a few were pioneers of breakthroughs in their day. I will have to make an in depth research to back up my claim though, so I guess I'll respond to your question later

I think you're right, however you also have to take into context that a lot of discoveries that were made a long time ago, were made in places whereby you kind of had to be religious, admitting not to be would have meant castigation or even death.

So in that respect it's very hard to tell who was really religious and who was just lying to save their lives and/or careers.

In this case though, he was definitely religious.

Cg

Catholics don't tend to be literal about religious texts. They usually say "what is the story telling us?"

That is why they say the world wasn't "literally" created in 7 days, the world isn't "literally" 6,000 years old. Noah didn't "literally" put two of every animal on an ark for 40 long days, daring them all to eat each other.

They are also pretty proud of their scientists, like rabies vaccine inventor, and famous milkman, Louis Pasteur. And they also teach that Galileo was a always a Catholic, despite disagreeing that the Earth was the big daddy of the Sun.

This I learned at Catholic school, as well as the fact that the Pope is the guardian of great secrets the world isn't yet ready to know. Don't ask!

We never learned about Lemaitre, but I know exactly what my old teachers would say about the Big Bang theory. They would say it looks an awful lot like God clicking his fingers. :)

This is true of a lot of Catholics, however I met one once who said that finding a feather on his pillow in the morning wasn't evidence of a leaky pillow, but rather the arkangel Gabriel coming to visit him in the night.

I can believe that Pasteur was Catholic, I'm not so sure on Galileo, simply because he lived in a time whereby not believing in God was seriously hazardous to liberty and possibly life. I'm not saying he wasn't, I'm just saying it's impossible to tell whether he was lying or not.

We never learned about Lemaitre, but I know exactly what my old teachers would say about the Big Bang theory. They would say it looks an awful lot like God clicking his fingers. :)

I like this, and back in my childhood in my pre-atheist days, I wondered why religion couldn't simply adapt the laws of science in this way... I later realised it was because religion doesn't like the words 'chance' or 'coincidence'...

C'est la vie

Cg

C'est La Vie indeed lol.

Of course, if life were a horse race, you could be seen as a betting man who swapped his bet from an outsider to the favourite.

This still means you are a man of faith, since it takes unprovable faith to assert that God does not exist.

And religious people would argue that faith in an outsider might be a better bet, since the payout on an atheist bet is zero, and the payout on an outsider bet is heaven.

I could be wrong, but it seems to me only the agnostic position avoids faith, by refusing to place a bet. :)

Loading...

Hi @cryptogee!

Your post was upvoted by utopian.io in cooperation with steemstem - supporting knowledge, innovation and technological advancement on the Steem Blockchain.

Contribute to Open Source with utopian.io

Learn how to contribute on our website and join the new open source economy.

Want to chat? Join the Utopian Community on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV

Amazeballs! I didn't expect that, thanks Utopian-bot :-)

Cg

Great topic @cryptogee. Here is another, Johann Gregor Mendel, founder of modern genetics, was an Augustinian friar (monk). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel
The official teaching of the Catholic Church is that there is no conflict between Science and Faith, as both are seeking the truth.

Nice one! I did not know that.

The official teaching of the Catholic Church is that there is no conflict between Science and Faith, as both are seeking the truth.

It's a shame that Pope John Paul II and Mother Theresa didn't espouse those qualities when they called condoms the 'biggest evil', thus condemning many Catholics around the world to death via HIV and AIDS.

I believe those statements have now been retracted by more learned Popes.

Cg

Hi, I should clarify, and I apologize if this is more information than you were looking for.

Here is a quote from the Catechism of the Catholic Church paragraph 159

159 Faith and science: "Though faith is above reason, there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason. Since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God cannot deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth." "Consequently, methodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God. The humble and persevering investigator of the secrets of nature is being led, as it were, by the hand of God in spite of himself, for it is God, the conserver of all things, who made them what they are."

The Catholic Church claims that it is guided by God to make definitive, authoritative decisions on faith and morals. It will never reverse its decision on contraceptives (condoms).

A strong stance to be sure, but it raises other questions. Until 1930 virtually every Christian denomination taught that contraception was sinful. Within the last 90 years essentially all have reversed that decision except the Catholic Church.
The question is why should there be a reversal on such a central issue? Is there a way to know God's will on this issue? How can we know the moral code we are following today will not be retracted tomorrow?

The Catholic Church has not reversed/retracted an authoritative decision on faith and morals in its history of nearly 2000 years.

Science can prove that AIDS can be deadly, but it cannot make a moral judgement on using contraception. I am not sure whether an abstinence based approach or free condoms would save more lives in developing Countries, but suppose for the moment free condoms would save more lives.

The goal of the Christian faith is to reach heaven which is eternal, so accordingly an eternity on heaven is better than a shorter life on earth. However, the Catholic Church also teaches that sex outside of marriage is sinful, so using a condom is almost irrelevant to this issue in most cases.

Even though Edwin Hubble published his findings after Georges Lemaitre, he is the one who got all the credit and a physical law named after him.

That is true, but Lemaitre is known as well in the field. By the way, did you know they wanted to created a Brout-Englert-Lemaitre institute in Belgium a while ago (Lemaitre was Belgian). I however don't know the status of that (I think the project didn't go through.

Yes he did get the credit he deserves, not till 2001 though! I didn't know about the institute, not sure if it happened.

Cg

This is a list of Catholic churchmen throughout history who have made contributions to science. These churchmen-scientists include Nicolaus Copernicus, Gregor Mendel, Georges Lemaître, Albertus Magnus, Roger Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, Roger Joseph Boscovich, Marin Mersenne, Bernard Bolzano, Francesco Maria Grimaldi, Nicole Oresme, Jean Buridan, Robert Grosseteste, Christopher Clavius, Nicolas Steno, Athanasius Kircher, Giovanni Battista Riccioli, William of Ockham, and others listed below. The Catholic Church has also produced many lay scientists and mathematicians.

I googled in curiosity ..so many

As I mentioned in other comments, it is difficult to know whether people like Copernicus and others of ancient times were truly believers, seeing as they lived in times whereby it was foolhardy at best to be an atheist, and at worst would cost you your life, through pain of torture.

However I do find it interesting as there is in my mind, a blatant conflict between scientific evidence and religious belief.

Cg

yeah true:)Thanx



This post has been voted on by the steemstem curation team and voting trail.

There is more to SteemSTEM than just writing posts, check here for some more tips on being a community member. You can also join our discord here to get to know the rest of the community!

Thank you steemStem bot, much obliged! :-D

Cg

@cryptogee thanks him to discover the big bang theory. Keep update more post like this, I like them.

The first that pops into my mind is Gregor Mendel and his pea plants. I remember not too many years ago learning this with my son for biology. Mendel is know for his work in genetics.

Yeah the church was not a fan of such "heretics" as Galileo Galilei lol.

religion and science
hmm

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 64057.95
ETH 3104.17
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.90