RE: Entropy vs Christ (A scientific basis for Jesus Christ Part II)
Yes I understand what you are saying. Your own personal testimony is something that cannot be disputed. What Christ means to you is not dependent on anything but your relationship with him. That's why sharing what you have gone through and your personal testimony should not be offensive to anyone. It is spoken out of love to others and not hate. Christians can disagree with others without hating them. The media portrays Christians as a judgmental group of people, and they do have a point. Some people do see others not following their beliefs to be morally inferior.
But God preached about love and Jesus was friends with tax collectors and prostitutes. He didn't love what they were doing, but the person behind all of the things they were doing.
It is a rare site that allows people with strong religious beliefs and those with no interest in that at all to be able to dialogue and listen to one another.
One side isn't stupid or lesser than the other, we just have different perceptions from our experiences in life.
"Your own personal testimony is something that cannot be disputed."
But also can't be confirmed or verified by the person experiencing it. There is also no reason for anyone else to believe it was anything more than a hallucination. We know the human mind is susceptible to seeing things that aren't there.
Absolutely. People receive enlightenment in a variety of ways. Some like @rok-sivante had his eyes opened by an ayuwasca experience.
It is our freedom to share and others freedom to accept or reject what we may tell them. But even a dream can open someone's eyes and change their life.
Everything can't be proven, but some things that cannot are commonly accepted. I believe we should question everything along with our experiences and come to our own conclusion.
"Everything can't be proven" Can you prove that? ;)