---- No Psychology Does NOT Say That... ----steemCreated with Sketch.

in #psychology5 years ago

Screenshot (54).jpg
Psychology Says What ?

I’m not sure if it’s just because i focused on this kind of thing a few weeks ago when writing a couple of articles on the subject matter (Social media manipulation tactics & Discourse analysis) that it has been more prominent in my feed or maybe because i spent so much time on it, that it "stands out" when i do see it.... but wow, there is so much of this crap floating around at the moment its astonishing.


"Psychology says never lie to a girl because she already knows the truth before she asks"


So to be clear from the get go, NO psychology does not "say" that, as someone who has studied psychology for a good number of years i can tell you that i never sat a class that was based on not lying to girls/women because they already know "the truth". I mean, i would love to see the kind of experiment which was conducted to reach this conclusion, we should replicate it....you know because psychology is a science, based on empirical data and evidence.... lol.

Now, one would assume that this statement is aimed at males... seeing as by the logic put forward in the statement, a girl would have no need to ask anything of another girl since they would "both know the truth" already... right? Is it me or is the argument falling apart already? But it does not explicitly state that so it is an assumption.... based on the logic defined in the statment.

Finally, this paints a picture of girls in a particular light, that is, 1) They ask questions they already know the answer to and 2) That they attain this truth/information/knowledge/data and instead of being open, honest and upfront with what they think they know, girls plan and scheme then revel in the act of watching others squirm.... so toying with others and playing games.


Conclusion


The image falsely represents itself as a psychological construct, is a backhanded shot at men and paints girls in a horrible light. There are more than enough flags going up already, but a dive into the comments section only fortifies the perspective. Women agreeing with the imagery and statement, calling men liars and cheats while men return fire calling women psychos and saying they "lie to themselves" etc.

While this image may be an anecdotal incident which occurs to any given degree, it is an immature notion to blanket all women and/or men into particular categories, pinning labels on them and pitting them against one another in the process. Let’s be honest here, this is only perpetuating the problem, not only by endorsing the unhealthy behaviour, but trying to claim that there is psychological scientific evidence backing it.

What this does is give credence to the action and justification for its use in any given situation... that is, influence people in relationships to play games and hurt one another, facilitate conflict and disconnectedness.

What we need to understand is that those who write these kinds of things have most likely been hurt by the very incident they are writing about, therefore there is a bias and the data is quite skewed. While it may be a good way to release emotion for someone who has experienced this themselves, framing it as a psychological construct is dangerous, and can be harmful to those who believe it because it "sounds about right".

Playing games in a relationship is a sure fire way to hurt people and get hurt yourself. Relationships are complex, there is no right or wrong way to do it, from monogamy to open relationships and more... it’s about how honest we are with ourselves and those we claim to care for. How we reach a point of acceptance of one another is being open and honest, then assessing if both parties are willing to engage the others autonomy and congruent self. If the relationship does turn out to be something other than advertised, deal with it head on, sort it out or break it off. Getting involved in a spy vs. spy game will only end in more pain and turmoil for all involved.

There is no benefit from subscribing to the nonsense spewed by "relationship hubs" which try and define the do's and dont's, what is right and wrong, 10 ways to be sure you partner is cheating, etc. Particularly when they are willing to lie about the data they present and have absolutely no concern about the negative impacts of the misinformation they are spreading.

Sort:  

Obviously * your* psychology classes were part of the patriarchy, lol.
As a woman, who therefore already knows the truth, I submit that the message is not for anyone at all. If simply telling males this ensured they would never lie, the message would already be obsolete. If saying it doesn't work, women who already know the truth should already know this and not waste everyone's time.
I guess it never said that we always know the truth about all things, but logically there is no way to have such infallible truth-knowing power unless it also applies to things that we didn't ask about.

Posted using Partiko Android

Yes the hegemonic masculinity is strong in this one , lolz. but yes you are right , its a deep rabbit hole to go down and it seems to loop back around onto itself, the logic is incredibly flawed.... but dont forget that logic is backed by the psychological sciences :P so it must be true right ?

You're just asking me because you know that I already know the truth :D

Posted using Partiko Android

Well... i am but a mere male... ;)

I totally agree with your assessment! So many people throw things out there without thinking them through, sadly. Reminds me a bit of this meme:

Lincoln&Internet.jpg

😂

lolz, yeah i love that meme, have splashed it around a bit for a good laugh.

What is scary is that people believe these kinds of things because they claim to be backed by "science", "psychologists" or any other authoritative bodies... Its like currently saying "x" treatment is medically backed to "cure cancer", besides being completely false, it is misdirecting people who subscribe to it...

I wonder if there would be as many of these kinds of articles if they were held accountable for what they put out there. but that being said they all hide behind the "websites title" as their "name" so you cant really follow up on who they are, their credentials etc.

It's nuts what social media has come up with for decades lol. I use to read the relationship columns in magazines as a teen and its pretty sad to see the same garbage is still out there being fed to the next generation.

oh yeah , the magazines are even worse, would you belive i had an ex girlfriend who started acting very angry towards me out of no where, when i questioned her about it i eventually got to the bottom of it... about a day later, lol.

What had happened is, one of these magazines had stated 5 ways to tell if your boyfriend "really loves you" (or something like that)and while i fulfilled most of the unrealistic expectations i had failed in one particular area. What area was that ? well i didnt bring her one rose after our first week of dating, two roses after the second week, three roses after the third week and so on.... we dated for about 2 years so i owed her 104 roses, lolz.

Honestly i think it is so unfortunate that us hoomans are so easily manipulated, but it is a crime to prey on people like that and make them miserable in a previously happy relationship. if we think for ourselves we can see how ridiculous it is... but we often get caught up in it all as being part of the "social norms" and subscribe to it because "well if they put it in a magazine it must be true " , lolz :)

Oh and this just in, science says eating chocolate everyday is good for your health. FB sayz so 😂

Doesn't it feel like these articles are trying to also manipulate you to consume more? More roses, more chocolate. They want us to feel like what we have isn't enough. But at least once we are aware of this, it is easier to avoid.

ohh defs the case, the psychological manipulation is incredible....

The Engagement Ring Story

How ‘Bacon and Eggs’ Became the American Breakfast

But we are too smart to fall for that kind of thing right ? lol. Ah us hoomans.... so confident.... but we shouldn't be ;) lolz

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by Cope (mfxae86) from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.33
TRX 0.11
JST 0.034
BTC 66407.27
ETH 3219.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.34