You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An International News Spotlight On The Kashmir Conflict // Part One: The Insurgency
Good post. Two things, in your opening sentence, I'd ad the year when you describe what happened in July. Its recent now, but everything becomes less timely. Also, later on, you say that Cashmer had all the elements necisary for an insurjency but don't list what those elements are As both the authors graduaded with degrees in international relations, I'd be interested to know. Hopefully this doesn't become a Syria situation.
Thanks so much for your advice! Great tip on adding the year.
Also great question about the elements necessary for insurgency! I tried to include them in the post, but I did kind of spread it out. To sum up what those elements were:
a) Pakistan's entire existence is based around the fact that it is the Muslim area of what used to be British India. When India became its own country, it was agreed that Pakistan would secede from the British Raj as a Muslim State. Kashmir has a large Muslim population, and as such Pakistan claims it.
b) India claims that Kashmir is part of India because the last king of Kashmir, Maharaja Hari Singh, signed a document stating that Kashmir would become part of India. Pakistan disputes the validity of this claim, saying that the document was signed under duress.
To sum it up: