The Irony of 'Russian Interference' and the Electoral Process in the West (2)

In the first piece of this article, I explained how Russia seems to be the perfect fall guy for media disinformation during election season. I also promised to show some examples of media hypocrisy used to sway sentiments in favor of a particular ideology by vilifying Russia.

I want to briefly show some examples of media reactions before during and after some major elections so we can all decide if the Russian interference allegations should be taken at face value or is just another power grabbing hoax by the mainstream crowd.

Germany

Allegations of Russian interference popped up before the elections but pretty much died after Merkels party retained power.

France

Although Le Pen didn't help herself by getting involved with Russian banks, Alleged Russian interference moved to an all time high after she qualified for the run off against Macron, only to die down when she lost

US

I've already given the Roy Moore example and how it has fizzled out because he lost, but Trump has received non stop heat over alleged russian interference for over a year now. It would have been so different had he lost.

Similar cases can be observed in the Dutch, UK and Austrian elections.

How come the media is only quick to scream Russia when their preferred candidate of choice doesn't win? It is disconcerting that the peace of the entire World is being dragged into this game of thrones by politicians and ideologues.

This isn't a Russian defence article but is rather a 'know when you're being manipulated piece'. If the media and political lobbyists keep being allowed to demonize Russia without proof just like we had in Syria, then we simply fall into the deep state's ploy to keep the World perpetually at War while a few profit.