You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Copsuckers can be funny

in #police7 years ago

Labels are applied objectively because actions in their outcomes are objective and don't require interpretation, as such a good action denotes correct behavior, or ethical, moral behavior, and in contrast a bad action (lying, cheating, stealing, initiating violence, rape, murder) denotes wrong behavior. Where (why and how) does interpretation play a part in labeling people based on their behavior?

Sort:  

Labels are applied objectively because actions in their outcomes are objective and don't require interpretation...

If they don't require interpretation, who's applying the label? Who's deciding what's "good" and what's "bad"? Who decides what is "correct" or "ethical" or "moral"? To act on these concepts, they must be interpreted.

Where (why and how) does interpretation play a part in labeling people based on their behavior?

Whoever does the labeling does the interpretation.

Nope, I don't need to interpret the color black. I don't need to interpret rape, or murder. I recognize. That is the difference, these things are RECOGNIZED. I have cogized and now I RECOGNIZED them. It's not INTERPRETATION.

Cognized: TO KNOW.
Interpretation: TO EXPLAIN.

Black doesn't need explanation, murder doesn't need explanation(huh!).

The label is applied by WHOEVER, that's who, it's IRRELEVANT actually in this sense who, what where and when the label is applied, only WHY and HOW.

But obviously it's all about the fallacy of moral subjectivity. Who decides?
It's been long decided by consensus of every living soul that murder, rape, lying, cheating, stealing is wrong. There are exceptions and these are RECOGNIZED by INFANTS EVEN.

To act on the concepts of wrong or right requires to recognize them, not to explain them. An infant, an ANIMAL knows fair, and unfair, wrong and right.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.35
TRX 0.12
JST 0.040
BTC 70541.68
ETH 3582.21
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.74