WE’LL STOP HAVING SEX TO HAVE KIDS: NEWSWEEK - DailySpigot 12/2/18

in #poetry5 years ago

🌄 IMPLIES THERE WON’T BE A CHOICE – 1984? 🌄

In an article we think is absurd, Newsweek says sex to have babies will stop.
The writer ignores the obvious, that sex will still make babies drop.
Unless they’ve plans making sex undesirable, babies will come from the act.
Maybe the writer sees sex being banned, or sex organs of men getting whacked.
However the writer’s thoughts came about, the conclusion is silly as hell.
And having a vision like this writer has, might mean that the writer’s not well.

The vision for quantum computing, and excitement that’s now pretty high,
Is likely in for a drop off soon, with snags too unreal to get by.
So says a physicist in essay form, in making the case it’s impractical.
The fact that “continuous parameters,” in numbers so large it’s not tactical
Must be processed nonstop; they’re more plentiful than particles existing
In all the universe, he’s saying - it won’t happen despite those persisting.

Neil deGrasse Tyson has responded at last, to the charges against him exposed
On Friday; asked why should he be believed, regarding the questions they posed.
He writes a lengthy response to the charges, convincingly stating his case,
Which, of course he has to do, if he’s seeking a chance to save face.
Ultimately it’s “he said she said” at play, multiplied by a factor of three.
Either Neil will be cleared or the women will win, but not everyone will agree.

Kensington Palace has a search going on, to find a “mole” who’s blabbing away
To the press about spats between Meghan and Kate; they get them most every day.
Tales about Meghan’s demeanor, and bad treatment of members of staff,
And tales about Harry being a dick, (‘cause the royals see Meghan as a gaff),
Sees Harry “throwing his weight around,” so no one thinks Meghan’s a harlot,
And demands they bow down to Meghan, including the cute Princess Charlotte.


Source:
Scientists have found we’ve 25 years left, ‘til we’re done for, headlines blare.
We wondered if the article mentioned, that CO2 can be sucked from the air.
Or that Magnesite now is swiftly produced, drawing CO2 from air surrounding.
So we read it and found that it didn’t, which says a lot about views they’re expounding.

The Cost Is Low To Remove Excess Co2 – Why Aren’t They?

The news, the news, there's so much in the news
The daily fabrications are so grand.
You likely won't be seeing much differing of views
Because they're all in lock step, understand?


Source:

Sort:  

Congratulations @free-reign! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You published a post every day of the week

Click here to view your Board of Honor
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.11
JST 0.034
BTC 64332.82
ETH 3146.25
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.17