Pizzagaters - arm yourselves with academic references to SRA part 1

in #pizzagate7 years ago (edited)

Pizzagaters, it always helps to have a few academic references to SRA under your belts. Whether you are making a video or trying to stand your ground in an argument, these guys are the big guns. Whip out your "peer review" pistol and you can hold doubters hostage: they cannot trash your "SRA exists" arguments because these big guns have been PEER REVIEWED.

One of the guys you're about to read, Dr Warwick Middleton, is a brilliant psychiatrist/psychotherapist who works with trauma victims. He founded the first trauma unit in an Australian hospital. It has the highest staff retention in the sector. He has witnessed the damage done close up - and his waiting lists are long. ln the video below, someone asks him a question about the perpetrators of the abuse. My ears pricked up when I heard it because I wanted to hear a psychiatrist discuss them but WM sidesteps the mark. Watch his interesting answer at around 2 mins in:

https://au.linkedin.com/in/warwick-middleton-md-1614a012

I felt a little let down when I saw that, although he does allude to the infiltration. But Warwick Middleton is speaking out - and loud. He's perhaps reluctant to give the perpetrators any ammo by outing them verbally: for him, the academic journals are a better way to go.

Middleton also informs us in that video series that many trauma victims have over the centuries been misdiagnosed as "hysterical" or "schizophrenic". He never goes into the mechanisms of whether this might have been a deliberate, long-term conspiracy/cover up but at least he confirms it's happening. Which is another useful weapon for your arsenal, particularly when handling arguments that SRA is all about "false memories": a top psychiatrist tells us that all sorts of "mistaken" (careful - stay grounded - "mistaken" is less provocative than "spurious" lol) labels have been applied in the past but the latest research is proving them wrong....

For those who don't want to read the whole article (although it's mercifully short and well-written and contains some brilliant factual anecdotes), I'll offer you the quote I use the most to duff up non-believers. I love this quote because it resonates. Rings like a bell. Here we have an expert, internationally-respected, explaining the conspiratorial concept of "Hidden in Plain Sight" in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry! So no, we are not crazy conspiracy theorists, according to one of the top psychiatrists on the planet - these people really are hidden in plain sight.

"There is in society a parallel universe that is very close. All of us, whether knowingly or unknowingly, have frequent contact with it. It is populated by individuals who outwardly appear to be respectable, law abiding and not infrequently influential, and even popular members of society. They are found in all professions and they sexually abuse children, some in ways that are almost unimaginably extreme." (Middleton et al, 2014)

The article also cites research from the 1980s telling us that 16% of American girls had been incestuously abused. This is a shocking statistic which may, infortunately, have grown but in order to stop all this happening, we need all the facts we can get and this is a corker. Dr Warwick Midleton and his team are obviously working hard to wake people up - they even hold public presentations in their trauma unit - so reference their work if it's useful to you - that's what it's for.

Institutional abuse and societal silence: An emerging global problem

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366952

Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2014, Vol 48(1) 22–­25
Warwick Middleton 1, Pam Stavropoulos 2, Martin J Dorahy 3,Christa Krüger 4, Roberto Lewis-Fernández 5, Alfonso Martínez-Taboas 6, Vedat Sar 7 and Bethany Brand 8

The Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse was announced by Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard on 11 January 2013. Examining how institutions with a responsibility for children ‘have managed and responded to allegations and instances of child sex-ual abuse and related matters’ (Australian Government, 2013) argu-ably represents the most wide-ranging attempt by any national government in history to examine the institutional processes (or lack thereof) for addressing such abuse. Its frames of reference are very wide:

"The Commissioners can look at any private, public or non-governmental organisation that is, or was in the past, involved with children, including govern-ment agencies, schools, sporting clubs, orphanages, foster care, and religious organisations. This includes where they consider an organisation caring for a child is responsible for the abuse or for not responding appropriately, regardless of where or when the abuse took place."

(Australian Government, 2013)

The phenomena of individuals, or groups of individuals, associated with institutions using their roles to further their sexual abuse of children or to assist in the cover-up of such practices will necessarily be illuminated by the Royal Commission. When the national inquiry was announced, there were no less than three state-based inquiries dealing with child abuse planned or underway in Australia, one in Queensland, one in Victoria, and a just-announced inquiry in New South Wales. It is a testament to the enduring and tenacious use of power by those associated with societal institutions that, in a global sense, it has really only been within the last two decades that the world has witnessed progressive revelations involving many instances of individuals or groups from such institutions sexually abusing children. This is notwithstanding a demonstrated palpable resist-ance on the part of the many institutions to cooperate in the uncovering of such crimes or the prosecution of those responsible.

Research demonstrates that approximately two-thirds of both inpatients and outpatients in the mental health system report a history of childhood sexual and/or physical abuse (see Read et al., 2004 for an extensive review). If emotional abuse and neglect are added to the mix, the percentage reporting an adverse/trau-matic childhood becomes even higher. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study, a pioneering United States epidemiological survey, has provided retrospective and prospec-tive data from over 17,000 individuals regarding the effects of adverse events, including child abuse, during the first 18 years of life. This enor-mously significant ongoing study dem-onstrates the enduring, strongly proportionate, and frequently pro-found relationship between adverse childhood experiences and emotional states, disease burdens, high-risk sex-ual behaviour, self-destruction, drug abuse, health risks/healthcare costs and early death, even decades later (Felitti and Anda, 2010). Furthermore, a recent detailed review found that child sexual abuse is intimately related to increased risk for poly-victimiza-tion, social stigmatization and impaired attitudes towards the self and the social world (Olafson, 2011).

A sizeable proportion of victims with childhood abuse experiences present to medical and psychiatric systems and receive various diagnoses which do not necessarily refer to the traumatic origin of their illness. While research on dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression is widely funded, grants are rarely given to study the mental health conse-quences of ongoing childhood trauma, which include dissociative disorders and complex trauma syndromes. Yet irrespective of the particular diagno-sis, the presence of childhood psycho-logical trauma usually interferes with effective treatment unless it is psycho-therapeutically addressed (Sar and Ross, 2006). The Australian Royal Commission has the potential to place at centre stage the frequently severe mental health consequences of a form of childhood trauma which affects large numbers of Australians and, by extension, to provide the impetus for the further development of trauma-informed mental health services that address both these individual and societal needs.

It is difficult to escape concluding that the single most pathogenic factor in the causation of mental illness is how we humans mistreat each other. Yet abuse of children is frequently perpetrated or overlooked by the professionals whose core roles emphasize the protection of children. These include teachers, health care professionals, police officers and judges, as well as clergymen. Despite the lasting damage of childhood mal-treatment, governments and societies have demonstrated an enduring reluc-tance to investigate how trauma and abuse contribute so substantially to filling our mental health centres, pris-ons, drug and alcohol services and medical wards.

Partially and belatedly, society is attempting something that has never before been achieved – progressive exposure to public gaze of traumas that, despite earlier attempts to foster their recognition, have returned to or remained in darkness. In 1962, Kempe et al. described the ‘battered child’ syndrome. By the 1970s, society was beginning to grapple with the mental health syndromes of Vietnam veter-ans, whilst at the same time feminist writers and researchers were chal-lenging decades-old rationalizations about Oedipal phantasies and hysteri-cal mendacity. In 1981, Judith Herman published Father–Daughter Incest. In 1986, Russell published The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women, a large epidemiological study on incest and other childhood sexual abuse. Russell’s study suggested that 16% of American females had been incestuously abused, 4.5% by their fathers (Russell, 1986).

Society’s confrontation with the extent of child abuse has been furthered by the documentation of abuses perpetrated in state or church institutions, as well as by evidence of violations of sexual boundaries by health professionals. In Australia, as elsewhere, there is increasing recog-nition of the complex syndromes that arise from severe and ongoing childhood abuse (e.g. Kezelman and Stavropoulos, 2012; Middleton, 2013a, 2013b; Middleton and Butler, 1998).

It needs to be emphasized that child sexual abuse occurs in any cir-cumstance in which it can occur, and that broadly speaking it is unsafe to assume that it won’t occur. Holding the religious position of priest or brother is a calling that happens to afford particular opportunities to abuse children sexually. Such individu-als carry the mystique of being the liv-ing representatives of God, are aligned with a rich and powerful global organ-ization, and occupy positions of power and authority that extend not only to children in their care, but to the chil-dren’s trusting parents and the wider community.

Children located in closed hierar-chal systems, such as orphanages or juvenile justice centres, are in particu-lar danger of sexual abuse. While egregious sexual abuse is found within churches, state orphanages, sporting clubs, scouting groups and the like, sadly most such cases arise within families, as borne out in abuse profiles contained in case series of patients with dissociative identity disorder (e.g. Middleton and Butler, 1998). The majority of ongoing child sexual abuse within our society is incestuous.

There is in society a parallel uni-verse that is very close. All of us, whether knowingly or unknowingly, have frequent contact with it. It is pop-ulated by individuals who outwardly appear to be respectable, law abiding and not infrequently influential, and even popular members of society. They are found in all professions and they sexually abuse children, some in ways that are almost unimaginably extreme. Whilst Josef Fritzl was por-trayed in 2008 as some sort of unfath-omable ‘monster’ who imprisoned his daughter in an underground ‘dungeon’ for 24 years (where she produced seven incestuously fathered children), a close reading of the English-language press reports of the last 6 years dem-onstrates at least 51 reported cases of ongoing incestuous abuse during adult-hood and/or multigenerational inces-tuous abuse from a total of 25 countries. In some cases it extended for longer than the 31 years Elisabeth Fritzl endured, and in some it pro-duced more pregnancies and children (see Middleton, 2013a, 2013b).

A key consideration for the Australian Royal Commission is the mechanisms by which prominent and institutionally connected individuals can repeatedly adapt the systems of their workplaces in order to sexually abuse children for decades. British media personality Jimmy Savile perpe-trated his sexual abuses for at least 54 years. It also appears that there were in excess of 450 victims. Yet Savile (who had a long-term association with the BBC) maintained a close relation-ship with Prince Charles, cultivated an image of a tireless charity worker, and had friendships with senior members of the British Government. He also managed to avoid any serious investi-gation of his crimes during his lifetime, despite the fact that many who worked with him were aware of his paedophilia (Brown, 2013). British Prime Minister David Cameron, speaking in the House of Commons on 24 October 2012, posed the per-plexing question: ‘How did he get away with it for so long?’ (London 24, 2012).

Operation Yewtree, the police investigation prompted by the child sexual abuse allegations against Savile, took on particular significance for Australia when the iconic 83-year-oldentertainer Rolf Harris became the fourth individual arrested. In late August 2013, it was announced that Harris had been charged with nine counts of alleged indecent assault involving two different teenage girls in 1980/81 and 1986, as well as four of making indecent images of a child, allegedly occurring in 2012 (Gearin, 2013).

In the United States, Jerry Sandusky served as assistant coach of Pennsylvania State University’s famous football team from 1969 to 1999. In 1977, Sandusky established ‘The Second Mile’, a non-profit charity serving underprivileged and at-risk youth. Sandusky often met his young victims through his work at ‘The Second Mile’ (whose motto is ‘Providing Children With Help and Hope’). In 2011, he was arrested and charged with 52 counts of sexual abuse over a 15-year period. In June 2012, he was found guilty on 45 charges relating to the sexual abuse of 10 boys and sentenced to 30–60 years in prison. Somehow his behaviour within this prestigious institution escaped scrutiny for many years (Huffington Post, 2013).

Any Royal Commission has to be aware that the parallel world of out-wardly respectable and at times pow-erful abusers, such as those named in the NSW Wood Royal Commission in the late 1990s, can contain close business, religious and political associ-ates. International experience makes it very clear that such politically con-nected individuals – who have every-thing to lose by an open inquiry into the activities of their networks – can exert enormous power. They can markedly limit, or even effectively destroy, an investigation which aims to expose their activities.

A prominent example of the extent to which an attempted cover-up can go is what has become known as ‘the Franklin Scandal’ in the United States. In this case, politically vested interests subverted the state police, elements of the CIA and FBI, the judiciary and the press. The Nebraska State Legislature had so little confidence in the FBI investigation of a national paedophile ring closely associated with the influ-ential and corrupt Republican Lawrence King in Omaha, Nebraska and the Washington lobbyist Craig Spence that they commissioned their own investigation. The State’s chief investigator, Gary Caradori, died (along with his son) when his light plane disintegrated and crashed into a cornfield near Aston, Illinois on 11 July 1990. Caradori’s briefcase, which was thought to contain vital evidence, was not recovered from the crash site, nor were the plane’s rear seats, the likeli-est site for a bomb. His death in such circumstances effectively ended the Nebraska investigation, as additional witnesses were then too frightened to come forward. King, jailed for embez-zling $40 million, had a $1 million civil settlement against him awarded in favour of a victim, Paul Bonacci, but has never been charged with sex offences (Bryant, 2009).

While there are some who will consign accounts of politically con-nected organized abuse, such as ‘the Franklin Scandal’, to the category of ‘conspiracy theory’, the reality is that our world is being progressively acquainted with the fact that such examples are repeatedly surfacing. In October 1996, 300,000 citizens staged a march through the streets of Brussels to protest about the enor-mously bungled police investigation into the crimes of Marc Dutroux, a serial killer and paedophile who many suspected was part of a sex ring whose members included high-rank-ing members of the police force and government. Jean-Marc Connerotte, who was the original presiding judge in the case, broke down in tears in the witness stand when he described ‘the bullet-proof vehicles and armed guards needed to protect him against the shad-owy figures determined to stop the full truth coming out’. He went on to state: ‘Never before in Belgium has an investi-gating judge at the service of the King been subjected to such pressure. We were told by police that [murder] contracts had been taken out against magistrates’ (Evans-Pritchard, 2004).

In September 2010, Carlos Cruz (a famous Portuguese television pre-senter), Manuel Abrantes (former Casa Pia governor) and Jorge Ritto (former UNESCO ambassador) were among six individuals finally convicted in respect to the activities of a politi-cally connected Portuguese paedo-phile ring that had operated for decades (BBC, 2010). Another long-running scandal, with a similar alleged political connection, has been centred on the Haut de la Garenne children’s home in Jersey. One of the visitors to the home was Jimmy Savile (Halliday et al., 2012).

In December 2012, the Argentine President Christina Kircher was among the political leaders who pub-licly expressed anger following the Tucumán court acquittal of 13 defend-ants accused of trafficking women. There was associated outrage and widespread protest across Argentina. Susan Trimarco, whose daughter van-ished at the age of 23, had carried out a relentless search which exposed an underworld of organized crime, and which included individuals who were operating brothels with protection afforded by authorities across the country (Aljazeera, 2012).

For all of history, children have been exploited and sexually abused. This is not only within families, but frequently by those who work within institutions and who have had the power or influence to achieve effec-tive immunity from prosecution. There was never some ‘golden age’ in which children were generally better treated (DeMause, 2002). As the full extent of institutional complicity in the sexual abuse of children becomes uncomfortably more obvious, it does not signify that we are falling into an abyss. Rather, it suggests that for the first time in our history, such issues have reached a point at which they have attained such significance that they have become the subject of a wide-ranging national Royal Commission.
References

Aljazeera (2012) Outrage over Argentina sex slav-ery acquittals. 13 December. Available at: tiny-url.com/aseugz9 (accessed 1 September 2013).
Australian Government (2013) Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Available at: tinyurl.com/pxurb74 (accessed 1 September 2013).
BBC (2010) Six men jailed for Portugal child sex abuse. 3 September. Available at: tinyurl. com/2dzxupu (accessed 1 September 2013).
Brown J (2013) Jimmy Savile: A report that reveals 54 years of abuse by the man who groomed the nation. The Independent, 12 January. Available at: tiny.cc/2nrosw (accessed 9 February 2013).
Bryant N (2009) The Franklin Scandal. Walterville OR: Trineday.

DeMause L (2002) The Emotional Life of Nations. New York: Institute of Psychohistory.
Evans-Pritchard A (2004) Jury tells of murder plots to block Dutroux investigation. The Telegraph, 5 March. Available at: tinyurl.com/kcylxdt (accessed 8 September 2013).
Felitti VJ and Anda RF (2010) The relationship of adverse childhood experiences to adult medical disease, psychiatric disorders and sexual behavior: Implications for healthcare. In: Lanius RA, Vermetten E and Pain C (eds)

The Impact of Early Life Trauma on Health and Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.77–87.
Gearin M (2013) Rolf Harris charged with indecent assault and making indecent images of a child. ABC News, 30 August. Available at: tinyurl. com/q7dgel7 (accessed 2 September 2013).
Halliday J, Viner K and O’Carroll L (2012) Jimmy Savile linked with Haut de la Garenne chil-dren’s home scandal. The Guardian, 9 October. Available at: tinyurl.com/8n66syd (accessed 1 September 2013).
Herman J (1992) Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence – From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.
Huffington Post (2013) Penn State Freeh report: Reactions to the investigation. Huffington Post, 12 July. Available at: tinyurl.com/n7oybqk (accessed 21 July 2013).
Kempe CH, Silverman FN, Droegemuller W, et al. (1962) The battered child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association 181: 17–24.
Kezelman C and Stavropoulos P (2012) ‘The Last Frontier’: Practice Guidelines for Treatment of

Complex Trauma and Trauma Informed Care and Service Delivery, compiled and published by Adults Surviving Child Abuse (ASCA), Kirribilli. Available at: tiny.cc/1urosw (accessed).

London 24 (2012) David Cameron reveals Jimmy Savile allegations to be investigated by Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Stamer. 24 October. Available at: tiny.cc/27rosw (accessed 9 February 2013).
Middleton W (2013a) Ongoing incestuous abuse during adulthood. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation 14: 251–272.
Middleton W (2013b) Parent-child incest that extends into adulthood: A survey of inter-national press reports, 2007–2011. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation 14: 184–197.
Middleton W and Butler J (1998) Dissociative iden-tity disorder: An Australian series. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 32: 794–804.

Olafson E (2011) Child sexual abuse: Demography, impact, and interventions. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma 4: 8–21.
Read J, Goodman L, Morrison AP, et al. (2004) Childhood trauma, loss and stress. In: Read J, Mosher LR and Bentall R (eds) Models of Madness. Hove, East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge, pp.223–252.

Russell DEH (1986) The Secret Trauma: Incest in the Lives of Girls and Women. New York: Basic Books.
Sar V and Ross CA (2006) Dissociative disor-ders as a confounding factor in psychiatric research. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 29: 129–144.

1The Cannan Institute and Trauma & Dissociation Unit, Belmont Hospital, Carina, Australia
2Research and Clinical Practice, Adults Surviving Child Abuse, Sydney, Australia 3Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand 4Department of Psychiatry, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa 5Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, USA
6Carlos Albizu University, San Juan, Puerto Rico
7Department of Psychiatry, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Turkey and President, European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS), Vienna, Austria 8Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, USA

Corresponding author:

Warwick Middleton, Suite 4D, 87 Wickham Terrace, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Sort:  

Very well written (although all the hyphenated words were driving me nuts)! To be clear, SRA is Satanic Ritual Abuse. The article (s) were about sexual abuse and very well done and documented but, I didn't see any reference to satanism.

Thanks, richq11 and you are right - kind of. SRA is the accepted definition within some quarters only. You won't find academics using that terminology because, for example, as SRA victim Fiona Barnett tells us, she was ritually abused in the name of many gods - Satan was just one of them. And what these groups call themselves varies. That's why, in my opinion, Middleton et al don't use that term. I didn't want to mislead anyone, though. And sorry about the hyphens.

Good point

The article also cites research from the 1980s telling us that 16% of American girls had been incestuously abused.

I have often wondered if statistics such as this have been intentionally over-exaggerated in order to normalize the behaviour. 16% is a considerable percentage, and it is difficult to imagine things are really that bad.

By propagating fallacious figures that speak of much higher rates of these types of incidents, do you think it possible that they are able to influence others to think that it is normal human behaviour and consequently, just by lying about the percentage, they actually increase the percentage.

I'm not psychic, but, I do feel that for the most part, someone who has suffered that type of trauma exhibits recognisable signs. I have known a few who genuinely have suffered this sort of shit, and you could guess it to observe them.

Perhaps there are those who are able to hide it better, but based on my own observation of the world, I do not think that numbers are anywhere near as high as they tell us, and it makes me wonder if the statistics are invented to both desensitize us to the horrors of this shit, and attempt to convince the weakest of us that for them to do it wouldn't be that bad, because apparently, nearly 1/5 are up to it anyway.. Which is just too hard to believe.

It also just seems like a difficult statistic to verify.. So the accuracy of it must be brought into question.

Nice piece though, I just wanted to share my thoughts on that particular issue.

Thanks son-of-satire, for your interesting reply. I thoroughly agree with what you say, particularly as genuine statistics are so difficult to generate and gauge; the area is open to abuse. It's also true that this type of research area (into human sexuality) may attract people whose interest is a little more than academic.

And yes: 16% does not match what I have observed over the course of my life, either. But there will be spikes in areas known as "cult" hotspots e.g. Orange County.

I do, however, trust Warwick Middleton and his team. And I was handed that article by an academic who is trying to get the word out. So my feeling here is that this could be a case of using "their" stats against them in the same way a martial artist will use an oponent's energy: if there was some kind of a normalisation agenda going on when the stats were generated/fabricated/exaggerated then let's use them a couple of decades down the line to raise public awareness.....reverse the original intent - does that make sense?

It may also be - and I hope not - that Dr Middleton et al are right! Maybe that is what they seen in their trauma unit?

Whatever the case, I feel/observe that east and west, we have all been subjected to massive "normalisation" and behaviour modification agendas for long decades and not just surrounding sexuality. That's why, in my opinion, it is wonderful that Pizzagate has arrived - for some, it's in the nick of time.

Yes that makes perfect sense. Use their own lies against them.

I Just Upvoted Your Post! No reason, just showing steemit Love. Have an epic day! :D
https://steemit.com/life/@iloveupvotes/kindness-is-all-it-takes

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.11
JST 0.034
BTC 66441.00
ETH 3217.31
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.22