You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Pizzagate people are gullible idiots
low grade bait but i'll bite.
1 of them looking like a depiction of a person of interest is dismissable but not two.
low grade bait but i'll bite.
1 of them looking like a depiction of a person of interest is dismissable but not two.
What is the actual original source of the police suspect sketches?
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/02/world/europe/portugal-uk-madeleine-mccann-digging/
Hard to tell the way CNN reports things but I would say Portuguese police
No, the source is Scotland Yard. They made mockup computer sketches based on witnesses questioned years after the fact. If Podesta and his brother were in the vicinity, don't you think Scotland Yard would have already checked them out?
http://abcnews.go.com/International/maddy-mccann-cops-release-sketches-kidnap-suspects/story?id=20563026
Well that sounds like speculation, which I do a great deal of with all of the stuff this pizzagate topic has generated but that is also why I can't just dismiss it and its followers as gullible idiots. I provided a single item that isn't hyped up innuendo, I hope others who reply to you will provide the other items.
You provided a photo of a mockup that you saw on a pizzagate conspiracy site and accepted as being two different people. When I pressed you for an actual source, you looked and saw that that the two photos are possibilities for the same suspect. Neither have you provided any evidence that either of the Podesta brothers were in Praia da Luz at the time.
You are being fed insinuations by fake news sites that only care about controversy, conspiracy, and page views.
Glad I did to, the fact that two witnesses gave two depictions looking very similar to both podesta brothers is mind boggling. Case has recently been reopened too. Look your objective is to say whatever to dismiss this and troll everybody here. The only thing that will convince some people that comet and podestas are involved is actual video and photographs with DNA and a written confession, and that is fine but dismissing people as gullible when so many coincidences and circumstantial evidence exists is not making you look like the intellectual you seem to wish to portray. Do your own evidence, take the time to obtain the most remarkable findings in the emails and elsewhere and dispute it yourself. Asking people to take the time to get all of this evidence for you to simply dismiss is just lazy.
The efits were released years after the disappearance not that the witnesses were interviewed years after.
Sketch artists existed 6 years ago. If they didn't have enough information to create a viable sketch then, then it is easy to see why the two sketches of the same suspect have so much variation now.
No it's not.
Look start another thread with a point by point list of what people are really focused on
Find the relationship with the Podestas and convicted pedophiles, find photos of either podesta with convincted pedophiles. Look up the whole Nose, Japan thing that is being investigated and then dispute those points in your own thread otherwise you will find that people are not going to be willing to exhaust all of their time debating this with you and you will not appear 'correct' rather just ignored.
Wait a minute, I have some looking at to do. There is an insane coincidence afoot here.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/14/british-detectives-efits-madeleine-mccann-suspect
What is remarkable is these two sketches are suspected to be of the same person of interest, given by two witnesses. Can't believe I didn't catch this before.
The suspect is also identified as being in his 30's Podesta would have been 55 nine years ago.
witness didn't get to see the suspects IDs, people can have difficulty telling a 30 something from a 40 something and neither podesta looks like they are in their 60s today. At least you're thinking now.