WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM AND THE THREAT IT POSES
When I first became aware of the Global Warming Scam and realized (though the globe did warm in the 20th century, it had peaked circa 1998, went into a pause) it is now on a cooling cycle I refrained from terming it as an oncoming Ice Age for the most part as I did not want to seem like an alarmist in the vein of AGWA. What I could determine of the data that I was exposed to was that we were in for at least a decade of cooling and that this cooling would pose certain threats in particular to agriculture and so far this has held true. Crop losses have been occurring globally. Check out this global crop loss map provided and maintained by Christian at Ice Age Farmer. Take note that the majority of these losses have been due to longer winters, freezing weather, hail, floods and in a couple of instances even drought.
So, for me, it has been simply about global cooling, a cyclical pattern between warming and cooling that we can trace back a long time in the scope of human history, but which is a short time when it comes to the age of the planet. And that this cooling would be problematic and pose certain threats that I believed would last a decade or so, that is until now. It will be far worse than I had imagined, which means getting the message out has become far more imperative. But the real question, at least for me, is, how do I get you to listen? And that is not so easy to answer. For many of you, your faith in your belief of man made global warming produces an angry hateful response to the suggestion that man is not to blame for climate. It is interesting to note that AGWA respond in a similar manner as do those that hypothesis that the earth is flat when one suggests to them that it isn't. Both these groups seem incapable in discussing their beliefs without resorting to ad hominem attacks, disrespect and bullying. It has led me to conclude that this may be due to 'cognitive dissonance'. In essence they know they are wrong as every sense within them suggests so, but they refute their senses for a belief which they cannot ally with the reality that they perceive. They need to convince you that their belief is true for by doing so it affirms their belief. For myself I do not want to convince you to affirm what I know, I want to convince you for your own future well being.
In 2002 this paper by Landscheidt was published called "New Little Ice Age Instead of Global Warming?" to which I had just read thanks to Diamond @solarshutdown, via his youtube channel The Oppenheimer Ranch which shows very strong evidence that this global cooling period is going to last much longer than a decade and is very likely going to take us beyond 2100.
An excerpt from the paper's abstract.
"Analysis of the sun's varying activity in the last two millennia indicates that contrary to
the IPCC's speculation about man-made global warming as high as 5.8° C within the next hundred years, a long period of cool climate with its coldest phase around 2030 is to be expected. It is shown that minima in the 80 to 90-year Gleissberg cycle of solar activity, coinciding with periods of cool climate on Earth, are consistently linked to an 83-year cycle in the change of the rotary force driving the sun's oscillatory motion about the centre of mass of the solar system. As the future course of this cycle and its amplitudes can be computed, it can be seen that the Gleissberg minimum around 2030 and another one around 2200 will be of the Maunder minimum type accompanied by severe cooling on Earth. This forecast should prove skillful as other long-range forecasts of climate phenomena, based on cycles in the sun's orbital motion, have turned out correct as for instance the prediction of the last three El Niños years before the respective event."
~Dr. Theodor Landscheidt
The quality of a model is its predictive ability and the fact that this has predicted the last three El Nino events puts it in good standing. Comparatively speaking all models based on CO2 as a climate driver have failed miserably at their predictions as shown below.
A model's failure to predict is indicative of a failed model.
Another excerpt from the paper
"The editors of the journal Science (2002), however, comment on the increasing number of publications that point to varying solar activity as a strong factor in climate change: “As more and more wiggles matching the waxing and waning of the sun show up in records of past climate, researchers are grudgingly taking the sun seriously as a factor in climate change. They have included solar variability in their simulations of the past century's warming. And the sun seems to have played a pivotal role in triggering droughts and cold snaps.” ~Dr. Theodor Landscheidt
Why the IPCC's insistence that the sun does not play a significant role in Earth's climate is wrong?
"The IPCC's judgement that the solar factor is negligible is based on satellite observations
available since 1978 which show that the Sun's total irradiance, though not being constant, changes only by about 0.1 percent during the course of the 11-year sunspot cycle. This argument, however, does not take into account that the Sun's eruptional activity (energetic flares, coronal mass ejections, eruptive prominences), heavily affecting the solar wind, as well as softer solar wind contributions by coronal holes have a much stronger effect than total irradiance." ~Dr. Theodor Landscheidt
Odds are you are not familiar with this image or what it represents. It is the product of research on the magnetic dynamo of the sun. This magnetic dynamo when the fields are aligned provides a conduit for energy to the earth, the further the fields are not aligned signifies a reduction in energy. Notice that at 2016 the magnetic fields begin to go out of phase and continues for 2017. This covers the past two winters which were atypically long and broke more than 6000+ cold temperature record around the world with many of them being decades or even more than a century old. As this phase misalignment grows further apart we can expect the weather to worsen. We are now entering summer time in the north and the phase alignment widens and what we are seeing is an incredible onslaught of hail the size of golf balls, limes, tennis ball and baseballs destroy everything in their path around the globe accompanied by unprecedented massive lightning storms. This increase in energy in the ionosphere is partially due to the weakening magnetosphere due to the decreasing output from the sun, and is allowing in more cosmic rays which are high energy frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum consisting of gamma rays, x-rays and some UV rays.
Come this January the phase misalignment increases to four times what it is now and this will only make the global weather that much worse. Adding into this mix is the fact that these cosmic rays excite silica rich volcanoes, cause rain nucleation and add energy to storms. As well there are health effects to be considered with cosmic rays.
The predictions of Dr Theodore Landscheidt
"After the phase reversal around 1120, maxima in the Gleissberg cycle, indicated by filled triangles, consistently go along with extrema in the 166-year cycle, whereas Gleissberg minima fall at zero phases of the cycle. Another phase reversal around 1976 changed the pattern again. After a secular sunspot maximum around 1952, a second maximum followed around 1984 without an intermittent minimum in between. The effect was a grand sunspot maximum comparable to the outstanding maximum around 1120. The phase shift around 1976 reversed the pattern created by the phase reversal around 1120. The Gleissberg
maximum around 1984 is the first in a long sequence of maxima going along with zero
phases in the 166-year cycle. The following maxima should occur around 2069, 2159, and 2235. After 1976, Gleissberg minima will again go along with extrema in the 166-year cycle. The next secular minimum, indicated by an empty triangle, is to be expected around 2030. The following minima should occur around 2122 and 2201. The figure shows that the Gleissberg cycle behaves like a bistable oscillator. The current phase should last at least through 2500. Because of the link between Gleissberg cycle and climate, future periods of warmer or cooler climate can be predicted for hundreds of years. The next cool phase is to be expected around 2030."
Basically what this graph reveals is that this cooling cycle is going to last a lot longer than a decade, it will last into the next century. It won't be all cool all year round but the potential for a year without summer is highly probable. We are entering a New Little Ice Age and we need to pay attention to it and not be focusing on the pseudoscience of anthropogenic global warming. We do not need to save the polar ice caps they will save themselves as the globe as a whole continues to cool.
WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO ENSURE YOUR FOOD SECURITY?
Thank you for reading, please share this message. Get the word out. And begin your own preparations such as stockpiling food. If you would like to see more posts like this please feel free to follow me, leave an interesting comment or question and I shall follow you.