You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Can NASA pictures be considered real or they are just deceiving art?
Very good post and interesting topic to cover. Imo there was not ever a moonlanding and there wont be one for the next decate or two as @mobbs already mentioned. If you can explain to me how any space ship or rocket wants to bypass the Van Allen belt. So far nobody has come close to atempting that since the radiation levels are just insane. #toasted
Yes, I don't think NASA had/has anything that crossed Van Allen Belts (assuming Van Allen radiation belts are real). NASA claims that they (Apollo) skirted the most dangerous part of the belt. This explanation sounds pretty poor and you're probably right. They didn't do it and everything about Apollo flights beyond some safe height is just a fabrication. I don't think NASA even has solution today. US also tried to break this belt during Operation Fishbowl and Operation Dominic.
They send machines through the belts, but humans is doubtful. Not 1 human has gone outside of low earth orbit in about 50 years now. NASA can't really be trusted.
Anyway, i hope you don't believe in the flat earth stuff, because that's been debunked 2 years ago.
I'm pretty doubtful about all astrophysics science except of what can be observed (and mainly verified) from Earth. Even then you must be careful about explanation of the experiment/observation and where this theory leads you. Anyway for people like me whatever you cannot be proven by experiment on Earth is just an issue of faith. I'm Christian and I believe in Jesus because He was proven in my life undoubtedly (on the other hand I must say I sought Him a lot and put a lot of effort into it even though for many years I had no evidence whatsoever). For purely scientific theories I keep my mind open so I don't believe flat earth much more than I believe round/rotating Earth just because I cannot verify enough evidence by myself. Actually more I research both models, more problematic issues I find with rotating sphere model. But flat-earth research is also contaminated by deceiving people and fake organizations filled with free-masons and other doubtful people (like Flat Earth Society), who spread non-sense arguments to undermine the research, and so you need to find genuine people in the area. I must say Eric Dubay makes lot of sense to me and many of his arguments are pretty strong. Feel free to check his statements for yourself
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html
Eric Dubay makes zero sense, all his claims have been debunked 2 years ago. Please do not fall for it, it's a lie to take your money.
I've never seen his arguments really debunked, can you point me to some good source?
Just look around Youtube for "flat earth debunked" or something, when looking at that information with an open mind you'll get in the right direction. You should probably start by looking at the angular size of the sun when filmed with solar filter and the fact that you can't see Polaris from the far below the equator.
Well, yeah, I've seen some of those and also those debunks debunked back :). It's really hard to go though all the claims. There are lots of half-truth and diversions. Something is wrong here - in both models. NASA could help but I'm pretty sure they are not telling us the all the facts they know.
UPDATE: I verified that part of Eric's argumentation is definitely not correct. So yeah, it's needed to test everything from all sides.
No, the heliocentric model is just fine for the most part. NASA lying doesn't immediately imply that earth has to be flat or that you have to assume it's geocentric for example. Most problems are with things like the big-bang (cosmic background radiation), dark energy/matter and black holes.