You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 💥 Booming Upvote Information - February
Hi @alexarelatos,
I think we have no right to request a list of votes cast by steemcurator01. It's like asking for a list of users that we vote for. Steemcurator01 votes for quality content that he has cheked. By curator01 decides who gets the votes and who is ineligible for votes. He will always support quality content. Even we give votes to those we like and not to those who like someone else. But that is not the case with booming votes. Articles selected by community administrators receive booming votes. Since those articles are not selected by the steemit team, it is important to get a list of them. I think you have now realized that getting a list of votes related to steemcurator01 has nothing to do with this matter.
Respeto tu opinión pero difiero de ella. Todo esto tiene origen a otras publicaciones que seguramente no has leído y la cual yo si he opinado.
No tienes cómo medir el nivel de calidad de todas las publicaciones votadas por SC01, pero si tienes cómo saber a quien vota con más frecuencia.
Todo esta matriz de opinión fue originaria debido a la centralización de votos en el Juego Diario, donde el mismo ha desmejorado su calidad y es el Slogan de Steemit, dejando por fuera contenido de gran valor sin una curación de peso.
Saludos @nicolas89 después ver esta lista todos tenemos curiosidad de ver la frecuencia con que vota los steem curadores porque seguro se va a reflejar que son cuántas seguidas por ellos.
Hi @alicargofer,
Thanks for your comment. But you should understand that the problem here is not with the curator accounts. Curators (curator01 and curator02) properly vote for users from those accounts. There is no problem it. But I do not think it's inappropriate to create a user list with curator01 votes. This is my opinion. Someone else will see it differently. If you really want to know it you can use the link mentioned by saracampero above. 😊
Gracias @nicolas89. 🥰
You are welcome dear ❤