Denmark's 3rd Largest Bank Is Now Paying People To Take Out A Mortgage

in mortgage •  2 months ago 

Back in 2016, when the first negative interest rate bonds first emerged, we offered readersa glimpse of the NIRP future:

After an intense pow-wow between the administration, Congressional leaders and the Federal Reserve, the Negative Mortgage Rate Program (NMRP) is born. The program is simple. Homeowners will be paid to borrow. The Federal Reserve declares that the NMRP is a brilliant extension of NIRP (negative interest rate policy), because it will benefit everyone, not just the 1%ers.

Here's how it works: No downpayment needed. 100% financing.

No payments needed. This is the reverse of the negative amortization loans during the subprime era. In other words, it is a negative negative amortization, or neg-neg-am loan. The loan balance will decrease instead of increase.

No need for mortgage insurance since, with no payments, there can be no defaults.

No qualifying needed, hence removing the entire cumbersome loan application process.

Your interest cost will be -$1,000 per year. In other words, your loan balance will be $99,000, if you make no payments at all. Using a commonly accepted 30 year term, the loan balance at the end of 30 years would be around $50,000, all without the borrower having to pay a dime in mortgage expense.

Well for Denmark, the future is now, because three years later and with over $15 trillion in negative-yielding debt around the world, Denmark's third largest bank is now offering borrowers mortgages at a negative interest rate, effectively paying its customers to borrow money for a house purchase.

Jyske Bank said this week that customers would now be able to take out a 10-year fixed-rate mortgage with an interest rate of -0.5%, meaning customers will pay back less than the amount they borrowed, or precisely what we said would happen in our 2016 preview of the dystopian future.

What this means is that if you buy a house for $1 million and pay off your mortgage in full in 10 years, you would pay the bank back only $995,000. No mortgage payments would be due between the purchase and payoff date, so effectively a borrower only has to repay principal... with a small discount, guaranteeing that the bank loses money on the loan.

"It's another chapter in the history of the mortgage," Jyske Bank housing economist Mikkel Høegh told Danish TV, according to Copenhagen Post. "A few months ago, we would have said that this would not be possible, but we have been surprised time and time again, and this opens up a new opportunity for homeowners."

"In practical terms... the negative interest rate will act as a 'subsidy' to the repayment. And the repayment portion will become smaller and smaller as the debt is reduced," explained Høegh.

How is that possible? "Yes, I hardly understand it either. In fact, I said it can't happen. But we have figured out how to have a negative rate mortgage" explained Høegh.

That said, even with a negative interest rate, banks often charge fees linked to the borrowing, which means homeowners could still pay back more.

As Insider notes, Jyske Bank's negative rate is the latest in a series of extremely low interest offers from banks to Danish homeowners.

What is even more bizarre however, is that unlike most of its European peers, Danmarks Nationalbanken, Denmark's central bank, has held its main lending rate positive at 0.05 percent since January 2015, whereas much of Europe and Switzerland have cut their rates in deep negative territory for the past 5 years.

And while negative rates on mortgages are only now becoming available to consumers, they have been available on short-term mortgage bonds in Denmark since May, according to Bloomberg. "It's never been cheaper to borrow," Lise Nytoft Bergmann, the chief analyst at Nordea's home finance unit in Denmark, told Bloomberg.


So what happens next? This is what we concluded three years ago:

Before you call us nuts, this is actually already reality. The governments of Germany, Switzerland, Japan and others are charging savers for the privilege of lending them money. Why stop there? Let the people enjoy negative interest rates when they buy a house, or a car, or borrow for a college education. In fact, why bother with taxes. Just let the government borrow to operate. The more it borrows, the more it makes.

And here we are, with banks now praising - and paying - debtors, whose loans are automatically repaid, while crushing savers who have to suffer negative interest rates on their deposits.

As such, the next (il)logical step is to take upside down finance to its extreme, and unleash MMT - i.e., helicopter money - on the population, because with a record $246 trillion in global debt outstanding, the only way forward is through a grand reset, one which inevitably involves hyperinflating the debt away. And that - as Bernanke predicted when he explains how to avoid deflation in his famous 2002 speech - will require a literal "helicopter drop" of money. Luckily, with negative rates, money is now worthless so the final lap in the grand race to the bottom of currency devaluation should be relatively quick.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-10/denmarks-3rd-largest-bank-now-paying-people-take-out-mortgage

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Its pretty crazy to think that soon people will be paying banks to look after their money. This is where and why gold will shine in the coming years. Investors are getting the nod/memo about this at the moment and are starting to try to front run it and speculate on its effects. Gold and silver will shine bright.

Can anybody explain why banks would do this?

Posted using Partiko Android

Banks operate on cash flow.
If the national bonds are priced at -0.6%, banks simply need to prove future cash flow, ergo payment at x year. This allows them to yield the interest on the negative-interest national bonds. Easiest way to prove future cash flow is to create debt by punching in numbers into a screen for a big-ticket secure-value asset; homes are the go-to for this.

In the end, the government prints surplus money to cover the bank's profit. What profit? If the national bond is at -0.6% and the mortgate is -0.5%, the bank makes 0.1%. The more cash flow, ergo debt, it can create, the more money the bank makes.

Ok, that makes sense to me. Thanks for the answer!

Posted using Partiko Android

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

95.09$ has been spent to promote this content using Steemium.
Learn more here!

How is this possible?