Yes, for the definition of a dualistic conceptual framework, the opposite is required. But, if no one was engaging in evil actions, evil would not be present for us to distinguish, and evil would not exist by our actions, but good would exist by default despite us referring to it by some other name, maybe, since it would just be "what is", and "what is" is truth level 1 of the current condition, and truth level 2 is the way things should be, so if what is is what should be, we are already in good and it's simply reality = truth = good without us needing to recognize it. Thanks for the feedback.