Aren't you wanting to find rules to judge others' behavior without fear of being wrong in your evaluation?

Not exactly.

Each individual is only "answerable" to their own personal moral framework. There is no "god" and "the government" has absolutely ZERO "moral authority". "the group" or "collective" or "community" ALWAYS expects the individual to be sacrificed on the alter of "the greater good", so "they" also have no "moral authority" (they're simply selfish, reflexively self-protecting, not "moral" or "immoral", just like any other animal/organism/organization).

What I'm trying to investigate are individual moral frameworks.

I'm not trying to "tell anyone" what their moral framework "should be", I'm asking them to describe their "moral ideology" and simply pointing out where their descriptions of their own personal moral framework are LOGICALLY INCOHERENT.

Now, if someone simply admits "I do whatever I flipping feel like, whenever I flipping feel like it", well then, 100 points for HONESTY.

But then if that exact same person starts railing against "spammers" and "trolls" and "low-quality-content" and "the immorality of a coercive government which derives its power from threats of violence", I'm going to point out their OBVIOUS INCONSISTENCY/HYPOCRISY/INCOHERENCE.

ETHICAL EGOISM,

Click to watch 15 minutes,