I will preface my reply / suggestion that I am a law abiding citizen, and not much of an activist. (that's my wife's job ;-)) So I don't go to protest marches chanting in the street.
I also don't advocate violence as a means to an end.

One thing governments around the world just don't understand about social media, the interweb and the way it is used, is that it enables people to connect instantly, come up with a plan and execute it ON-THE-FLY.

Fed up with censorship? Get your mates, their mates, everyone you can connect to, to get a can of spray paint, go to a government facility (that is not secured) and write the words Censor this! on it.

Make this happen ALL OVER THE WORLD AT THE SAME TIME!

Do it again the next day, and the next, different days different targets, different methodologies, different people.

Start writing your posts in spray paint - bring this material they want banned into the real world - ten feet high.

Then you will see governments shit bricks. Because this could be truly decentralized, uncontrolled activism. No leaders, no-one to vilify, no-one to lock up, no country to invade, no way to shut it down without shutting the whole of the internet down.

Those of us who work in the digital space tend to be agile, flexible, creative. As soon as the dinosaurs in parliament shut one avenue five more are opened. And that is even without going to the ballot box.

Someone, somewhere needs to have a quiet word with those trying to shut down our ability to communicate freely, and show them this scenario.

Once the touch paper is lit and we have retired ten paces, there is no going back. Their control over what we read / watch and how we communicate will be lost forever. All trust will be lost forever. what they saw will be classed as irrelevant by an international population that had just stopped listening to them.

I'm old and I can see this. Young people will take to this concept of ignoring government like ducks to water.

How do you govern when no-one listening?