Fingerprint Votes Would Alleviate "Every Vote Counts" Issues

I'm rme as I write this post. I can’t believe the ‘seeming’ ineptness going on in Flo-rida.

This doesn’t exclude the other states having similar difficulties obtaining a final tally on the nearly week-old elections.

Let’s face it, the vote is like potato salad left out on a hot summer’s day. The longer it is left to incubate, the more tainted it becomes.

This ‘convenient’ delay in getting all of the votes counted is suddenly causing a disparity in percentages that is morphing into a life of its own.

For more reasons than one, I can understand the GOP’s urgency to get-er-done. Personally, I am of the mindset that disparities should have a 72-hour window of contesting.

Beyond that point, it should be deemed a run-off; and, a new date set to vote, from square one. As it stands, no matter the outcome, it’s going to have a hint of a tainted result; leaving an unsettled nausea of doubt on the losing side of the coin.

It’s so hard to believe that we can do face time worldwide; but, can’t make something as straight-forward as voting a smooth process.

How hard is it really to have people use a fingerprint as an identification match PER VOTE?…(emphasis on per vote...lol…)

I realize in the rarest of occasions people’s prints match; but, if it’s good enough to use at the DMV, and for some bank transactions, then why not give it a go for voting. Oh…I get it…could it be there’s so much fraudulent voting going on that the idea of using a print would hinder the bogus results?

Geez. Prayers everybody, prayers. I smh as I end this post; as, I'm reminded of the 2020 elections. Something tells me it will be more of the same, as clearly no one's trying to learn any lessons from past discrepancies.

Best regards.

Peace.