PedoGate, Podesta, the English Crown and the End of Infowars
Many of us in the Truth community are very disappointed in Infowars for hanging Pizzagate out to dry, but Alex has never really talked about this DC Pedophile ring that many of us think deserves investigation.
The amount of disinformation concerning this suspected DC child trafficking ring is massive, but if you saw all of those images from the Alefantis' IG account - "#Hotard" with the disabled 2 year old child's picture, "#Killroom" with the picture of the empty deep freezer with "#Murder" being the reply by a Comet Pizza employee who makes child sized, welded steel coffins for a hobby. "#Pills and Bills" with $5000 in Euros next to a bottle of Xanxex and the reply of "That's my money -> That's his money", "German baby for sale" and on and on - Then you likely believe (if you are new to this, Google "Alefantis Pizzagate IG" and be sure to read the Instagram thread on each picture - these pics will surely be scrubbed soon, but are available as of the time of this post).
The Art from Comet Pizza, since painted over because of it's inappropriateness, was predatory. The live music they performed - all pedophyllic. If you Google for the live performances at Comet, supposedly a kid friendly joint, the guy in the ski mask making pedophile jokes on stage is James Alefantis, the ski mask is his thing. Just look at his mouth and lip outline, perfect match.
You saw the dozens of inappropriate posts from this Pizza Shop owner's IG account that we think indicates Alefantis uses it to pimp kids - he shows the kids on this account, or makes posts indicating when he has a child available. These are not Alefantis' kids he shows, and they are not at the Pizza Shop (nobody has ever said the ring runs from the shop, or Hillary runs the ring, those are MSM lies). Who are these children on James Alefantis' (French phonetically j'aime le Infante, I like the infants - odd coincidence when the evidence shows that he may well traffick in children under 5) Instagram account, all of whom look very uncomfortable, none of whom are smiling?
Did I mention that this Pizza Shop owner is the 49th most powerful man in Washington DC according to liberal rag GQ magazine? Apparently "I like infants" is the World's most powerful Pizza Joint owner. Why? How? The GQ list includes Senators - and Alefantis is in the top 50 most powerful people in America's Capital, a sought after list by those in the town, for slinging gosh darn pizza pies! He is a suspected child trafficker - that's why. Convicted child pedophile Dennis Hastert made it to speaker of the House by pimping his interns then Blackmailing those who took the bait, and he only got 15 months for doing it - pedophilia against very young children is a thing among those in power, and those with the kids are considered powerful.
Pedophiles are not weirdo's in their mom's basement - they are the "elite". Recently deceased children's bodies have been found in unmarked graves at the Royal Palance - the Crown Prince of England's best friend was the most prolific pedophile in English History, Jimmy Saville, a man who was employed by the State for his entire life, and put in a high position at the Children's Hospital in his old age where it was an open secret that he raped not only sick children but corpses of children - look it up. Silence by the British Main Stream Press until Saville died, but then it all came out - just Look It Up and you will believe.
Look at the SCOTLAND YARD Forensic Sketches for Madeline McCann's kidnappers (attached) - these computer generated sketches are accurate down to the mole on Tony's forehead and the glasses imprint on John's nose. Look at the new Snopes piece on "Does Podesta match McCann Abductor Sketch" - look how hard that Fake News psyop tries to cover for him, and that's the best they can do, retroactively explaining the cold, hard fact that the attached image really is the Forensic, Computer Generated, Scotland Yard Sketch of John Podesta and his Brother Tony. Do those look like the same person to you?
John and brother Tony Podesta were vacationing at the home of a convicted pedophile - Sigmund Freud's grandson, just blocks away from where 2 year old Madeline was abducted.
John Podesta deleted the month's prior worth of of his emails just hours after she went missing - check the Wikileaks, it shows the missing month. He never did that again, but this one day, a man of this import deletes a month of emails - I don't delete a month of emails and I'm no John Podesta. What was John Podesta hiding just hours after a child down the street from his pedophile hangout goes missing?
When Wikileaks released the Podesta emails, their very next tweet was a link to the FBI list of known pedophelia symbolism - a very rare move for Wikileaks. Wikileaks, who is the most accurate news source in America, many tens of thousands of releases without one single error, went out of it's way to put the Internet onto this. The Wikileaks are their own evidence, FBI pedophilia language in John Podesta's email is robust.
Podesta's artwork is Pedophyllic - in a way that most of us would be disgusted to own, much less display. His favorite artist paints images of children (infants) being raped by grown men from the POV of a witness - Google "Podesta Art" and try to hold your lunch. This is the art the Pedo-sta brothers hang in their homes.
When convicted pedophile Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert was indicted - what did John Podesta say about one of his best friends - that he "should escape to an undisclosed Asian island". Advise on evading the law given to a convicted child rapist, concerning evasion of child rape charges, by a man suspected of raping children. No condemnation, advise on how to get away with raping kids by John Pedo-sta, What a surprise.
These men have pedophile friends, pedophile art, were with a convicted pedophile near the crime scene, precisely match the Scotland Yard description of suspects to a child abduction, they talk using FBI confirmed pedophile slang, they deleted emails (furtive act) IMMEDIATELY after young Madeline went missing, they have no alibi, et cetera ad noseuam - and police have not so much as questioned them. How is anything debunked?
Means, motive, opportunity, predilection, a network of pedophile friends, furtive actions, pre-planning on how to get away with it if caught - any normal person would have long ago gotten a Fed knock at the door - but these so called "elites" are protected because 1/3 of those in DC do this. That is how Convicted Child Pedophile Dennis Hastert became THE Speaker of the United States House of Representatives - that is why the most prolific pedophile in England is a best friend of the next King. This is not a little thing, and it will not go down without a fight.
Trump is rounding them up - more pedophiles arrested so far this year than most full years, and he is just rounding up the foot soldiers so the snitching can start - there is much more to come. That is the real reason Trump is so hated by the establishment - this is what they fear most, the pedophlie connection is the big secret that keeps 9/11 and all of the other, vast multitudes, of government crime from coming out. Just like the mob makes you "earn your bones" so they know you will keep quiet for your own sake, this is the big secret - Child Rape are the bones of the elite .
There are only three things in the World that matter right now - Pedophelia, Fukishima and 9/11 in that order, Alex does not talk about any of those (when is the last time Alex Jones mentioned 9/11 on air) . Many of us have been suspect of him for a while - for me, this was the last straw. There is too much evidence for this child trafficking ring being worthy of an investigation, and Alex says too much other stuff about all sorts of other crimes, and now all he talks about is irrelevant politics, for me to think this is Ok - or that he has not been coopted. AJ and Breitbart art main stream, better than most, but still main stream media, IMO. David Seaman is next in line in, he is the new tip of the Spear. You can tell he is by how much hate he gets - and all he talks is Child Rape, which is all any of us should talk until this is fixed ( and some Fukishima so the saved kids aren't irradiated and the species can continue, but let's save the kids first and foremost. What use is being alive if our kids are not safe ).
I don't care if I was the only person in the World to believe Pizzagate Is Real, I saw the evidence with my own eyes, much much more than I can type here, before Reddit scrubbed it claiming a "Witch Hunt" for the first time in the site's history.
Indeed, Witch Hunting we are.
"For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret." - Ephesians 5:12 KJV
Very rEsteemed!
I can't unseen this Wicked Shite either...
I feel people shouldn't be as upset with Alex. He has to protect his show and employees. They are trying to discredit infowars and ruin them financially with court and lawyer fees until he goes bankrupt. He responded and said he's going after the pedos even harder now. Check this out but BE WARNED it will hurt your soul you will join the fight in some capacity. The founder of zynga runs a pedo network.
https://imgur.com/a/ZL2TN
People join Steemit. Get rid of Facebook. Especially if you have a family and your children pictures on there.
Follow the money, after all that's all Alex Jones is interested in.
Fully on board with PizzaGate and agree that the evidence is clearly there to be worthy of full investigation.
I take huge issue with the Maddy McCann connection though, as someone who has followed that case from the beginning it simply doesn't add up, all the evidence in that case points towards no abduction whatsoever, and the composites that people reference are two people's interpretation of ONE PERSON ('Smith Man').
In the quest for Truth - here is the best refutation to the above post that I have seen online:
The two sketches come from the Smith family in Ireland. On the night Maddie disappeared they seen ONE man walking along carrying a child. However, their descriptions were very vague and the police put more faith in the Jane Tanner sighting of another man.
However, the leads dried up and so the McCanns hired private investigator Henri Exton of Oakley International. Exton went to Ireland and got descriptions of the ONE man from two different family members. So one man, two sketches.
The family descriptions placed the man as being about 35yrs old, with one family member saying he was about 20-30yr old.
So one man who was about 35yrs old, definitely not two Podesta brothers.
Edit :
Original Post on
Each witness described a visually unique person acting so suspiciously that the police assumed, in passing, that the stunningly different drawings were of the same man. Each witness says that their forensic sketch is accurate - but the drawings look absolutely nothing alike.
In light of the substantial differences in the images themselves, along with new information which has surfaced since the time of these drawings release, and our current suspects - many citizens believe these are clearly two different people. Evidence supports the assertion that these are not two very different drawings of the same man - one fat with a mole on the forehead, one skinny with glasses - but clearly two different men. Furthermore, we may know who these men are, and the suspects, brothers John and Tony Podesta, match the drawings precisely.
The two drawings, one man, theory was a weakly held early assumption that is no longer supported by the facts and evidence of the case - an assumption which must be revised to fit the known facts, rather than being used as weak evidence in defense of the suspects, who were unknown at the time of the drawings release.
The weakly founded assumption that these two very different images are of the same man is open to revision to match the facts, rather than the facts conforming to the weakly founded assumption - especially when the suspects, who know each other, who both have pedophyllic tendencies and who were with each other near the crime scene at the time of the abduction without alibi, both match the precise eye witness descriptions so well.
The suspects have pedophile tendencies based on their collection of pedophile art, they have a network of several known pedophile friends, they were staying in the home of a known pedophile, just down the street from the abduction site, they deleted email records just hours after Maddy went missing and have no alibi for the time of her abduction, the suspects attend occultic ceremonies and run in circles where abuse of children is well documented, the primary suspect has offered advice to a convicted pedophile on how to avoid prosecution for pedophelia. A review of the suspects emails (wikileaks podesta files) contains numerous occurrences of language known to law enforcement to be pedophyllic code and which only makes sense when read in a pedophyllic context. Much more evidence is available - and to top it all off the suspects were witnessed at the scene of the crime and drawn with such a high degree of accuracy that the sketches themselves, when combined with means, motive and opportunity are ample evidence to warrant a SIMPLE INVESTIGATION into the suspect's whereabouts.
Lacking formal investigation, we do not need to prove and convict the suspects in the YouTube comments section - but does not such evidence Warrant a formal investigation, for the sake of a missing child?
That is all we ask - a formal, thorough investigation of the facts presented. If it were you or I, the investigation would have been conducted long ago - only the prominance of the suspects has protected them scrutiny, an immoral protection that must end. We demand an investigation based on the evidence.
Are citizens asking too much considering the preponderence of evidence - including the sketches which match the suspects with such uncanny precision? Of course not, we are demanding the normal procedure be followed for these men as it would be followed for any other!
The snopes refutation of these images forensic sketches relies on the illogical assumption that a fat man with a mole on his forehead and a man half his size with glasses are really the same person - if each witness saw their suspect with such accuracy as to point out with confidence such minor details - I have a hard time believing they could not tell if the man was fat or skinny.
Furthermore, the snopes refutation does not address any other aspects of the abundant evidence that these men are engaged in pedophyllic activities within a network of known pedophiles. Even without the witnesses - the suspects means, motive and opportunity would draw them into question - and with the sketches, the need for investigation is irrefutable. To not investigate draws the enforcement of law itself into question.
These are obviously two separate individuals, use your two eyes and your God given common sense - any fool can see that is not the same mane, especially when compared to the suspects we have now developed as described above.
Your (snopes) entire refutation lies in an illogical assumption that the witnesses are wrong, and all of the supporting evidence is coincidence, rather that the police interpretation, made under high pressure and with far less facts than now available, and which has failed to produce a suspect, may have been wrong in saying these two obviously different suspects are really one man.
Logic demands you revise your opinion to match the facts rather than attempting to conform the facts to meet your opinion.