Purpose is great, strategy is illegal.

After the suppression of the militants, the ongoing anti-drug campaign also shows that all suspected drug operatives are 'armed'! This is happening every day as a 'gunfight'. Every day, the number of dead people is increasing dramatically due to new deaths. At least nine people were killed on Sunday night. The indication is that, eliminating the suspects is the main tune of the government's anti-drug policy. Another notable aspect of the anti-drug campaign is that the Directorate of Narcotics Control, or the police, is the elite section of the law enforcers, RAB They raised the slogan, 'Let's go to war, against drug'. An effective and strong step to protect the catastrophic drug intrusion, especially on the young society, was anticipated a long time ago. Therefore, there is no scope for doubting the fact that the government is forced to roll back the business of drug trade. However, due to the strategy being followed, There is no question about its accuracy. Is this strategy legal? No matter how noble the purpose is, if the work is not lawful, then it can not be supported in any way.
In the backdrop of RAB's active role in the ongoing anti-drug drive, I recall the recent interview of RAB director general Benazir Ahmed. In the interview given in the first light, he said that extrajudicial killings are wrong. His counter question was, what is the killings involved in the trial? In his commentary, he imposed a false word on the media for the responsibility of using the word (extraordinary killing of 'extrajudicial killings', first light, 18 March 2018).
The head of RAB has raised the question that what is the trial-killer killings? Actually there is nothing to be included in the trial killings; What is there is death penalty. None other than the judicial court have the right to punish this sentence, especially not to any authority or force engaged in crime prevention. The scope of their responsibility is to bring the criminal under legal means and to bring it to the court for trial. And no matter how serious the charges are in the current law of Bangladesh, no one can be considered guilty until it is proven guilty in court.
The protests of government and law enforcers for adjective extrajudicial killings are many days. The Joint Forces Operation During the BNP-led coalition government, the objection was still to apply. The objection was the government and the security forces. The government therefore made laws in parliament on the basis of the impunity of participants in that campaign. There is no need for impunity if any work is lawful. So, during that period the truth was established that they were state-approved murders. Our high court later said it and declared the impunity illegal and ordered the trial of the guilty. The trial of these killings was not held today, and the state is not interested in the trial even if the government changes. Now the question is, what will be the deaths of those who are being killed in the alleged gunfights? State Approved Assassination (State-wide Killing)? The death of suspects in these gunfights is inevitable, None of them are injured or returned. And they are not willing to give any opportunity to investigations, even the National Human Rights Commission and these forces.
During the militant campaign we heard a lot of gunfight. Still there have been allegations of human sympathy and sympathy for the militants by denying objections and criticism of free human rights groups in the matter of trial or extrajudicial killings. But they are unable to claim that militancy has been abolished following the strategy. Earlier, This technique has been followed in the wake of the January 5, 2014 election for some political activists in connection with acts of sabotage and terrorism. The controversy has now been covered by critics as a supporter of Jamaat-Shibir. Now critics of the same strategy criticize the possibility of attending drug dealings. But the question is whether the government can take neces