Thank you, @wirngo for participating in the teaching Team Challenge. Below is an evaluation of your article :

Comment/Recommendation 👇🏻
1). Interesting topic of the lesson, thanks for the explanation.

2).I'm sorry to ask, but I believe that part of your process must have been the interaction that made you not dominant in the lesson, the initial 5 minutes and 52 minutes of the process certainly made your students hear quite clearly what you said. 3 minutes later it may be part of the output, with some notes you provided. This may be my description to clarify the stages of the learning process you are doing.

3). It takes a more detailed explanation to separate each part of the change, both cognitive, affective, and psychomotor that you get, this is my opinion and it is possible that my suggestion could be wrong.

4). Thank you for sharing your views on the method you told, it may be useful to those who read it.

5). Thank you for the photos you shared with us all.

Improvements/Advice : We are sorry, but there are things that we have approached along with other members of the teaching team about some emphasis and also a much more in-depth explanation of points 2 and 3.
But despite everything, we are happy with what you share with us, it becomes a source of new knowledge.

Without prejudice to respect, again without prejudice to my respect.
This is just a suggestion from me as a teaching team to assess what users write, you have the right to respond or not to respond. Because the assessment process is based on the knowledge that I mastered as a teacher in real life, everyone has different levels of understanding and tastes. Overall this post is valuable and of great quality, keep up the great work. Best regards to you.