Analyzing the Economics of Yield Farming Strategies

Source

INTRODUCTION

Users provide liquidity to decentralized protocols for rewards through yield farming or liquidity mining. For most cryptocurrency investors, this has positioned itself as a great source of passive income. In yield farming, users put assets in liquidity pools and in return get interest or governance tokens. Like any business, the economics of yield farming is subject to supply and market; hence it is important to analyze various methods of increasing the income earned by investors.

As decentralized finance (DeFi) has expanded on the ecosystem more yield farming protocols came incessantly. Each of those protocols provides different incentives and rewards distribution approaches. The mechanics of Yield Farming are in-depth and depend on the construction of the platform, the risk, and the assets being invested in. All these affect the gains that investors expect from yield farming strategies and hence the importance of seeking to know the economics behind them.

Those attempting to understand the mechanics of yield farming need to also look into areas like the dynamics of interest rates, market prices of reward tokens, and permanent loss risks. These limits may serve as guide posts in the establishment of the proper strategies that would guarantee to maximize the return and at the same time pose lower risks in the quick moving environment of decentralized finance.

• YIELD FARMING PROFITABILITY AND TOKEN REWARDS:

Distribution of reward tokens strikes as a critical factor in yield farming profits’ determination. For instance, Uniswap or Compound pays liquidity providers in the form of newly created tokens native to the platform. Such bonus tokens can either be moved off to the market or spent on governance considerations, hence having an extra layer of justification. It should be noted, however, that reward token price is also of great importance as its volatility does directly affect the profitability of the scheme.

Nevertheless, it is important to note that the yield farming profitability is slowly declining as more and more users engage in this process. As the pool attracts liquidity, earning interests or distributing benefits lose value. What this implies is that the first few people to participate are likely to earn much profit as compared to those who come in towards the end of this process, and particularly where the competition for the rewards is quite massive. Appreciating this trend is crucial in planning how to partake in yield farming.

Price volatility of the token is also quite critical in the overall parameters of yield farming. A good and highly priced reward token can lead to a very profitable strategy, but in the event of an eventual price drop of the token, such rewards will be of little value to return on investment. For this reason, managing time for going into the yield farming strategy or exiting it is crucial in generating maximum returns.

• RISK OF IMPERMANENT LOSS:

Yield farming has its own risks, one of which is impermanent loss. This happens when trouble occurs due to volatility at significantly changing the value of the assets that were placed in a liquidity pool, by significant margins, after the time of depositing them there. In such criteria, liquidity providers would not be able to realize the potential gains which would have been achievable while holding the assets outside the pool. This concern is particularly acute in volatile markets, characterized by frequent and wide price ranges.

Source

AMMs rely on liquidity pools to enable trade instead of the book exchange method. These adapted Joel Fitch encourage the employing of certain strategies by bias allocating resources to volatile markets thereby creating certain losses known as impermanent risk. Factors such as the yields summerized from the yield farming activities can in a way cater for some level of impermanent loss, although it will still be an important risk that one has to take into consideration when evaluating the profitability of any given yield farming strategy.

There are ways to deal with the illusionary risk where those who wish to remain within the limits of the pools, must select those irrationally. The course of a stablecoin pool is quite stable, therefore impermanent loss risk is minimal. These pools, however, do tend to yield lesser profits as compared to highly unstable asset bases, therefore exposing one to the risk and reward trade-off.

• CAPITAL EFFICIENCY AND LIQUIDITY LOCKUP:

Capital efficiency denotes the effectiveness of the yield farming strategies in utilizing the available capital for returns. During yield farming, the term total value locked is a critical metric since it shows the liquidity locked within a DeFi protocol. High TVL makes sense because it indicates the healthy involvement of users but can also be perceived as an unhealthy thing since it may indicate low yields as the rewards are shared among many people.

The liquidity lock-up period is one more factor that yield farmers take into account. Some protocols may make it obligatory for the users to lock their liquidity for some time, which limits usability. Lockup periods can make the participants susceptible to elevated risks such as volatility in price or changes in the operational structure of the protocol that are not anticipated. Capital efficiency improves when liquidity is readily available for investment or withdrawal depending on the market situation.

The last aspect relates to the need to maximize the capital efficiency by choosing the yield farming platforms that have good lock-up conditions and more reward rates while minimizing the risk. Others entail using the liquidity of various protocols in the same or across several strategies with the aim of enhancing returns on investment, but this adds to the level of complication. Some simpler simpler management methods may be required in order to avoid losses from potential risks.

• RISK MANAGEMENT IN YIELD FARMING:

Even however, yield farming is associated with its own risks including smart contract risks, regulatory risks and market risks. Ondreywa (2020) advises that the ‘smart- contract risks’ can arise from egregious hacking or inability to patch the system. Since a large number of the DeFi protocols are not applied, yield farmers need to evaluate the safety of the respective yield farming platforms closely. This can be reduced by using highly ranked and audited protocols in building a niche.

Regulatory risks relates to yield farming as well. Compliance has always been an issue of underperformance or risk to be faced because when there are regulations that are around DeFi for instance, the platforms and the users may be risked with compliance that may inhibit their yield farming strategies competitive efficiency. A very careful attention with respect to emerging rules and regulations will be of utmost importance in relation to sustaining oneself in yield farming for a long period.

Lastly, risk management for yield farming involves using several platforms for the farming of several asset pairs. As a result of the fact that yield farmers withdraw liquidity from the same pool into different pools which helps make the risk less.

CONCLUSION

Source

To invest in more productive yield farming strategies within the ecosystem of decentralized finance, then assessment of risk profitability trade off is very essential. It is fully dependent on the farmers’ pools on how much yield farming is going to earn in returns.