White House DESPERATE to Block Lev Parnas from Testifying
--The White House is becoming desperate to block the impeachment trial testimony of Rudy Giuliani's indicted henchman Lev Parnas, and is working to classify former National Security Adviser John Bolton's testimony in order to conceal it
Should these men be allowed to testify?
▶️ 3Speak
Well as usual I see you haven't done your homework. Giuliani never hired Lev Parnas, that would be diGenova and Toensing, a law firm hired by Firtash. diGenova and Toensing said they hired Parnas to transcribe documents that were written in Ukrainian. When it comes to Firtash, and if we get that far, Joe Biden is going to regret the day he set Firtash up. Which the more I keep learning and what happens coming forth will determine whether this is really a power struggle between democrats and republicans over control of the the corruption money flowing out of Ukraine or a real call for justice in getting to the truth that it was Ukraine and the democrats who set up the interference in the 2016 election. If you try and sort it all out it makes complete sense that the democrats were heavily invested in a Hillary win as it took them years to plan or push out Russia's (or tried to, which was one reason Russia moved into Ukraine) main control over gas supplies in Europe and other countries and to explore along the coast line to frack for natural gas and oil. It wasn't just about Russia and Ukraine but about the players involved in the distribution and ownership of the companies. You can call it ironically or another coincident but the same time they went after Burisma's then owner under the pretense of obtaining illegally licenses for drilling (their first initiative and move against him, maybe this is why he opted to sell all but a minority share back in 2011, I do not know) but they also used that same tactic to start an investigation against Firtash. Ultimately it would be Firtash not Parnas whom set Giuliani up with the right players. Knowing how Trump plays it's (in my opinion) completely feasible (also given Giuliani's long relationship with Parnas) that they used Parnas as a distraction while they worked with Firtash to get connected to the right players. If that is even remotely true the joke will be on the democrats for falling for it. In Ukrainian Firtash made billions as a distributor between Russia and Ukraine contracting through Naftogaz. In order to take control of Ukraine gas supplies he and Russia would have to be contended with. Firtash also worked in the procurement of minerals on the international markets. Back in 2011 an investigation was started against Firtash concerning titanium mining rights in India. Boeing was supposedly desperate for titanium as they had gotten a huge order. They turned to a company in Chicago who does international contracting for rare minerals. That company turned them onto Firtash but in the contract the company told Boeing, and it was written right in the contract that when dealing with oversea's parties in securing rare minerals there was a chance that bribes could be involved. Knowing this Boeing signed the contract and Firtash then went about paying India for the mining rights. Boeing backs out of the contract and the deal didn't go through. Firtash then finds himself being investigated for bribing officials in India. In early 2013 a grand jury finds him guilty and hands down an indictment. No charges are brought against Boeing or the company who was working with Boeing and no charges were ever filed in India and Indian officials said there was never any bribery. The picture wasn't complete yet as they hadn't finished helping Ukraine overthrow the presidency of Yanukovych, that task didn't come to fruition until February 2014. Now here comes with a lot of things coincidentally collide, the UK files charges against the owner of Burisma for money laundering, (though he'd already sold the majority of the company and fled to Russia along with Yanukovych), Firtash is picked up and arrested on the indictment charge, he post bond and flees the country, this is all done and taken care of by the end of March 2014, along with a hefty deposit into Hunter Bidens company posted on Mar 31, 2014, Hunters partner is appointed to the board of Burisma and in April 2014 Hunter Biden follows onto the board of Burisma.
Okay so hold onto your hat as this part can make people's head spin. A man name Ihor Kolomisky bought Zlochevsky shares of Burisma apparently oblivious to the new players in town. So in essence when British authorities froze Zlochevsky assets in Britain there was nothing there for Ukraine to hand over to Britain as he no longer owned the company. In essence it was really Ihor Kolomisky that Britain really wanted but paperwork on who owned the company was pretty hard to find....though investigative reporters did finally find it...but at this point Biden and his players were well into the game of setting up new players up to and including investment and banking companies within the US which ended up becoming four entities as co-owners of the company. After all the work they'd gone through to over thrown a government whereas in a Forbes article titled Play The Energy Card in Crimea, dated March 2014: "early hints are the west is willing to let Crimea go. Former defense secretary Bob Gates said last week he was already convinced the region was lost while this week Secretary of State John Kerry commented that Putin's actions in the Crimea were "not a threat" and "nothing personal". The article also state: "The rut of all this is that we are likely to go into a long tedious cycle where Putin consolidates political and administrative control over the peninsula while the west equivocates." In essence the players within the Obama administration were willing to sell out Crimea over control of the gas supplies. Several months go by and Britain is ordered to release the assets of Zlochevsky because they haven't gotten any documentation or cooperation from Ukraine. That's because in reality there is none because they have the wrong owner. So technically when you read that the prosecutors office in Ukraine wrote a letter stating there is no investigation currently going on concerning Zlochevsky it was true because for one he no longer owned the company and for two he'd left the country. Now if Britain had asked about Ihor Kolomoisky as being suspect there may have been something they could have looked into. What about all those demands made by many including the UK to get to the bottom of corruption in Ukraine?......well, hold onto that hat.....seems those four companies that formed into Burisma became a group of foreign investors, banks, etc., and settled on becoming one entity known as Privat Bank which somehow along the line ended us coming up short 5.5 billion dollars in their account. That didn't bold over well when Ukrainian investigators couldn't find the money....(which is still missing to this day) so Joe Biden goes over there and demands the prosecutor get fired (as we seen on the video) ...but he plays it like the world has come to know it all along, that he's talking about the investigation into Zlochevsky, the once owner of Burisma because heaven forbid it ever comes out that they masterminded the control over Ukraine's natural resources by Britain mistakenly asking that the previous owner be investigated for money laundering when it fact it was Ihor Kolomisky whom they aligned themselves in business with that Britain really wanted investigated for money laundering and if that had happened maybe, just maybe they wouldn't be missing 5.5 billion dollars. Does the prospects for ever having an investigation against Ihor Kolominsky seem likely under this new president? Nah, the new president and himself are good friends, he actually bankrolled his run for the presidency. So given all this you can see why the democrats with all they have invested in this during the Obama years that it was crucial for them to see Hillary win, crucial enough, in my opinion, and probably many others if they understood it all, to have actually set up the Russia collusion narrative. It would also explain their push to oust Trump through impeachment, they have a lot of stuff buried under the rug they don't want exposed. Even though the chances that Trump will get the current president to investigate any corruption are slim given the close alliance the president has with Ihor the status quo in Washington feels that even a Pence presidency better understands the dirty politics of Washington and overall it looks like one hell of a dirty game....so like I said, will Trump press for the truth or is this an inner struggle over control of foreign resources.
In the mean time you even talking about Parnas is about as much a joke as....