I am one of that 95% so the statements apply to me, I make up my own mind on every issue based upon what the data indicates. If the data indicates something I support that and defend it, if the data changes through new research, then I re-evaluate and update my statements to reflect it.

While I don't directly study GMO's (and I have no interest in doing so) what I work on is used by people who are in that field. I am critical when the data indicates I should be, and not when it doesn't. Funding doesn't have anything to do with it.

If the statements you have made come from that documentary, then I think you should put "facts" like this.