There's a missing thread here that's kind of part of the problem. The concept of the divine right of rule is flawed because it contradicts the royal law, which is the basic maxim of all law that can be found in all those traditions, religions, kingdoms and secret societies etc. you mentioned. The royal law is basically the golden rule, which tells us all rights have their foundation on being consistently applied to all, not just some. So sayings like "treat others as you would have them treat you" "be kind to you, as you are kind to others", "the sun shines on both the holy and the thief" etc. are found in every part of the world for as long as we've had culture. So the actual divine right to rule is based on our remaining in honour to that simple rule. When we demonstrate ourselves to be in dishonour, by our prejudice, bias, self interest, we abdicate our right to rule. That act is a handing over our sovereignty to intermediaries between us and the divine, those whom might call themselves guardians, who take care of our free will for us until we can demonstrate integrity and humility. While we deny that, and truth is, there's so much disinformation promoted obscuring these simple ideas, we are saying we are not ready for further revelations.