You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Letters in Philosophy (3.0)
I'm pretty sure Nature wil be able to throw a bit of quantic chaos into every situation. I don't expect us to fully agree. I'm only pointing at the definitions.
Couldn't find the 3rd, in short notice. Take the 9th.
So I can stop argueing since you by yourself showed me how the work is being changed by some kind of interpretation.
;-))
The question if Beethoven would agree is not answerable for me, but if we return to Beethoven's text and to the very opening, than the non-musical but conceptual interpretation question arises: Is this the introduction of the orchestre as if the musicians were tuning instruments? The answer to the question will lead you to conducting in this or in that way.
As I said... We are both arguing about different definitions. I will clarify them in my next letter.
What is that?
One eighth of a byte of chaos?
Quantic Mechanics Chaos. Entropy. We seem to always stumble on definitions. Quantic is not a measure of the size of the chaos... You know what they say about the flap of the butterfly's wings.
Oops. I was just kidding on the "bit".
...belongs to Chaos Theory and not to Quantum Mechanics, I think?
An in particular to fragile systems far from balance.
It causes a local violation of the second law of ...
...the municipal ordinance.
I think it all comes under Thermodinamics, yes. We did the whole mathematics of it and then the spin equations and stuff... It's a whole package. And chaos is just a mathematical allucination. The point is: a cat is involved and there will be chaos. Maybe the cat is responsable for that.
The cat is innocent.
It's the phiole which phiolates the rules.
lmfao!