The intelligence agencies have never worked for the people of their respective governments, instead it's just the opposite. They are all, knowingly or unknowingly, working for the slow and insidious destruction of any real liberty that people have left. They heads of all the agencies are committed to a one world government, religion, and currency.
Regarding the points in article on the "conspiracy theorist" moniker, check out the proof of the CIA's creation of this meme at my recent post
Yup! The "intel" agencies, and any other that work in "secret" are only there to gather info on us and to carry out nefarious activity, which does seem to be pushing for a NWO.
But an FYI on your post, I included that Zero Hedge article in my video, but note that they are not fully accurate when they say CIA created the term. It is likely that CIA created the term "Conspiracy Theorist" but I have not found any definite proof of it. Check out my video at the 1:09:43 mark.
OK, I need to ask you a question off topic. You're basically brand new to Steem as well. You have just a few followers like me. This post has been up 2 hours and you have close to $5 in Steem for it. I can't seem to get anywhere near these amounts on very similar posts to yours. Do you understand why the results might be so different and what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks for asking. I am new to this as well so I'm not 100% sure, but this video may help explain why: https://youtu.be/zGFHpCPJOek. Basically I think a big driving factor to the revenue is based on the users that upvote certain content. If viewers have a large "reputation" than they drive higher weight when they upvote. Besides that, I am not too sure. I will be looking into Steemit more in the future too :)
Thanks a lot for the video. I've watched this one already but it still doesn't seem to answer it. Unfortunately neither does this one from steemit. I've read that you need "whales" that will vote for your content but somehow it still seems like I must be doing something wrong (that or I've been blackballed by the "whales"). Happy to hear any new insights you come across.
For sure, I'll let you know! Also, I believe the Steemit algorithm takes into all of a user's posts as well. So if you have 10 posts that didn't get lots of views/comments/upvotes, etc., then it will affect later posts. Also I believe they take into account how "original" a post is. For example they might have a bot that searches the web for similar or the exact text/links, etc., so it's best to create new content as opposed to simply embedding a video or a link. I'll let you know anything further I learn!
That's very helpful and worth keeping in mind. Thanks a lot, and I'd definitely be happy to find out anything else you might learn going forward as well.
The intelligence agencies have never worked for the people of their respective governments, instead it's just the opposite. They are all, knowingly or unknowingly, working for the slow and insidious destruction of any real liberty that people have left. They heads of all the agencies are committed to a one world government, religion, and currency.
Regarding the points in article on the "conspiracy theorist" moniker, check out the proof of the CIA's creation of this meme at my recent post
Yup! The "intel" agencies, and any other that work in "secret" are only there to gather info on us and to carry out nefarious activity, which does seem to be pushing for a NWO.
But an FYI on your post, I included that Zero Hedge article in my video, but note that they are not fully accurate when they say CIA created the term. It is likely that CIA created the term "Conspiracy Theorist" but I have not found any definite proof of it. Check out my video at the 1:09:43 mark.
https://youtu.be/EVOkxeW2-nA?t=1h9m43s
OK, I need to ask you a question off topic. You're basically brand new to Steem as well. You have just a few followers like me. This post has been up 2 hours and you have close to $5 in Steem for it. I can't seem to get anywhere near these amounts on very similar posts to yours. Do you understand why the results might be so different and what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks for asking. I am new to this as well so I'm not 100% sure, but this video may help explain why: https://youtu.be/zGFHpCPJOek. Basically I think a big driving factor to the revenue is based on the users that upvote certain content. If viewers have a large "reputation" than they drive higher weight when they upvote. Besides that, I am not too sure. I will be looking into Steemit more in the future too :)
Thanks a lot for the video. I've watched this one already but it still doesn't seem to answer it. Unfortunately neither does this one from steemit. I've read that you need "whales" that will vote for your content but somehow it still seems like I must be doing something wrong (that or I've been blackballed by the "whales"). Happy to hear any new insights you come across.
For sure, I'll let you know! Also, I believe the Steemit algorithm takes into all of a user's posts as well. So if you have 10 posts that didn't get lots of views/comments/upvotes, etc., then it will affect later posts. Also I believe they take into account how "original" a post is. For example they might have a bot that searches the web for similar or the exact text/links, etc., so it's best to create new content as opposed to simply embedding a video or a link. I'll let you know anything further I learn!
That's very helpful and worth keeping in mind. Thanks a lot, and I'd definitely be happy to find out anything else you might learn going forward as well.