Effective and progressive solution for climate change?

in #climate5 years ago

Advocating for a carbon tax of $75, the author writes:

"Electricity prices would rise 70 percent on average — though only 53 percent in the United States — and gasoline prices 5 percent to 15 percent in most places.

"But that’s the picture before one considers what the money raised by a carbon tax could do. If governments recycled the revenue back to low-income and vulnerable people, and cut economically inefficient taxes — such as income taxes — a $50-per-ton carbon tax would feel to the economy more like $20 per ton. The plan would help low-income households and place a higher burden on the upper-income bracket. There could also be money for essential research and development to aid the energy transition."

Stop right there. This "simple" direct plan for controlling CO2 emissions just got really really complex. IF government recycles the money back to low income people, and IF the government cuts economically inefficient taxes, THEN the plan won't run into insurmountable political opposition or hurt the poor so badly no person could in good conscience support it.

This is like saying you're going to cut your travel time by driving faster, and all that's necessary is that there be no traffic, no police, and no bad weather. Just as you cannot control those things, the advocates for a carbon tax - not only outside of government but inside it - cannot control the decisions about how to distribute that money and what other tax adjustments to make.

Their theory of government is not how the thing works. Government does not rationally make all the proper adjustments that will make something work. Government is not a conscious entity that has an incentive to do any such thing, but a conglomeration of individuals with various interests in varying offices responding to the demands of various individuals. And the tug of war between all those varying interests pulls pieces off of policies here, slices there, and so on. And that additional policy on which your primary policy's success (political or technical) is predicated has its own wholly separate legislative path to tread.

Could a carbon tax reduce C02? Absolutely. Can it so simply be made politically palatable and unharmful to the poor? Not remotely.

Sort:  

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Congratulations @honeybee! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You received more than 50000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 55000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

SteemFest⁴ commemorative badge refactored
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!

anytime the government is put into a position to "recycle revenue"... I'm against it, no matter what the stated objective is. :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 64271.38
ETH 3157.43
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.25