BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY: "Is Blockchain Technology about to unlock the secrets of the events of 9/11?"

in #blockchain7 years ago (edited)

BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY UNLOCKS THE EVENTS OF 9/11

Is BLOCKCHAIN about to unlock the secrets of 911.png

BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY AND THE EVENTS OF 9/11

What we need to know is how those buildings came down.

There are so many unanswered questions and that is quite scary.

No proper Scientific Test, Data Analysis and Eye Witness Investigation was ever done and no fully comprehensive investigation was ever carried out.

The official explanation was dead wrong.

With over +30 years experience in Construction, Heavy Engineering, Finance and Data Analysis I wanted to share with you my thoughts on the events of 9/11.

WHERE DID ALL THE STEEL GO?

September 11, 2001 was a day that changed history when two planes crashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre and several columns were severed on impact.

Jet fuel ignited and caused office fires on multiple floors and the both buildings soon collapsed rapidly and destroyed beyond recognition.

On the day, nearly 3,000 people lost their lives and since that day countless have lost their lives from the inhalation of asbestos particle dust that so many were exposed too.

According to official reports it was fires that caused the structural steel columns to weaken that caused the buildings to come down in a total collapse.

WTC BUILDING 7

Unknown to most people, a third building, WTC 7, also a steel framed and concrete building came down that same day, later in the afternoon, again almost in rapid free fall decent and also completely destroyed.

The building was built with approximately 40,000 tonnes of structural steel work and yet it collapsed as though there were none.

The official report for building WTC 7 collapse was again due to scattered office fires fuelled by office furnishings.

The building fell within approximately seven seconds at near free fall speed, falling straight down, symmetrically and to within its very own footprint.

Falling at this speed, the only way that this could be achieved would be by zero resistance and one that would need all steel columns to be severed at the same time simultaneously.

In a beam failure and floor collapse this would create a pancaking effect where one floor would resist the weight of the floor above and thus result in a jolting effect.

This never happened and building came down at the near speed of gravity.

Even if a single beam and column did fail it would not have caused a systematic failure of all the other beams and columns in the building.

This systematic failure of all columns and beams at the same time could only be achieved by secondary explosions or accelerators.

I can accept that a damaged building built of structural steel and concrete could fall in an irregular pattern or even fall over, but cannot accept that it could just simply evaporate.

Evidence shows that when WTC 7 building collapsed the centre core columns failed first bringing the penthouse area and roof down first. Followed by the whole complete building.

The collapse of building WTC 7 has often been referred to the smoking gun of the event.

REMOVAL OF STEEL AND MATERIALS

400-500 trucks full of steel and material were removed per day and little or no evidence was retained.

In normal structural failures photographic events of each beam, each column, each piece of debris would be photographed, picked up very carefully and records taken for evidence.

This was never done.

EXPLOSIVES AND ACCELERANTS

During the official investigation the evidence for explosives and accelerants were never looked for and investigated.

High rise buildings simply do not collapse due to fire.

In the history of steel framed buildings, not one building has ever completely collapsed to within its own footprint due to fire, let alone evaporate into dust.

Previous office fires may cause a buckle, asymmetrical or part collapse but never a complete collapse and one that would see the concrete and steel pulverised into dust.

FIRES

Despite official reports saying that the structures were weakened by office fires caused by jet fuel the majority of the jet fuel ignited and was burnt off in the initial explosion and it was gone.

Evidence shows that the fires were not raging and were in fact oxygen starved by evidence of black smoke from the buildings.

These were effectively a low temperature fire.

The burning temperature of jet fuel is 750 degrees Fahrenheit and yet it was supposedly this that compromised the steel.

You could, if you wish, hold a flame under a piece of steel at 750 degrees Fahrenheit and it would not reach a high enough temperature to bend the steel let alone melt it.

COLLAPSING

If the buildings had collapsed due the weakening of the steel as the official explanation suggests you would expect to see the building buckle under the weight.

This official report suggests that the upper section dropped first and it was this that pancaked on the rest of the building.

However when the upper section actually drops it too disintegrates and therefore would not hold enough weight to push the remaining building flat to ground floor level.

The top section even if it did stay intact would meet equal and opposite forces on the floors below which in essence would be pushing back up on the upper section.

Effectively, if the top 15 floors crushed while pushing down on the lower sections, these 15 floors would meet the equal and opposite forces to the 15 floors below.

This would only result therefore in a maximum number of 30 floors demolished as a maximum and not the entire building.

If the official explanation was to be correct you would be looking at a jolting action of the top third of the building only.

It could have been acceptable to have seen a third of the buildings standing as the top sections mushroom out, but in all three collapses the building completely disappeared in their entirety.

ANTENNAS, CORE COLUMS AND ELEVATOR SHAFTS

Before the buildings started to collapse the antennas on both WTC 1 and WTC 2 buildings started to drop first.

These antennas were over the middle of the centre of the building and effectively over the top of the elevator shafts.

These elevator shafts and the centre core columns are a fundamental piece to the integrity of the strength of the buildings.

Each building contained approximately 45 core columns and these core columns surrounded approximately 50 elevator shafts.

The only way that these building could have collapsed at near free fall speed would be if these interior core columns were compromised.

There could have been no other way.

EJECTION OF STEEL BEAMS

Each tower created a 1200ft diameter symmetrical debris field around the base of where the towers stood.

Evidence shows that 1,000’s of tonnes of steel beams were ejected sideways out of the towers at estimated speeds of 60 miles/hr as the buildings came down.

Gravity works vertically and not laterally and therefore gravity alone did not eject these beams.

Some of these multi tonne steel beams were projected over 600ft from the towers and some landed in adjacent buildings.

Not only were the steel beams ejected sideways, clear evidence suggests that these beams were pulverised in mid air as they fell.

With a total destruction of both towers to the ground floor this cannot be down to gravity alone as the forces required to do this simply do not match the laws of physics.

PULVERISATION

Should gravity have brought the buildings down then I would have expected to have seen larger portions of concrete and steel beams and at least a large portion of the bottom floors still intact, albeit buckled under the weight of the collapse.

What occurred was a total destruction of both buildings in identical characteristics effectively pulverising each building to dust.

Steel simply does not pulverise to dust due to gravity.

Days after the event and after the dust had settled there is evidence of dust piles inches deep across most of Lower Manhattan.

MOLTEN STEEL

Evidence of molten steel running down the channels of the steel beams even days after the total destruction would not be created by a gravity collapse.

Flowing molten steel was evident in the rubble pile of all 3 buildings at ground floor during the aftermath and would suggest extremely very high temperatures, way beyond what could have occurred by jet fuel alone.

Jet fuel, which is simply kerosene, is not capable of creating the heat necessary to melt steel or iron.

Molten steel needs approx 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit to create lava and this way exceeds the temperatures that can be generated by burning jet fuel.

THERMITE

The only compound available to melt steel at such a high temperature in a fraction of a second is Thermite.

A chemical reaction of Thermite would effectively destroy steel by simply evaporating it and melt it near instantly.

Thermite is the only compound that would instantaneously comprise each column in succession.

There is no other way.

In just little under 2 seconds Thermite could reach temperatures of over 4,500 degrees Fahrenheit and would simply liquefy steel.

Open air fires could never reach temperatures sufficient to melt steel.

Thermite cutting charges in the use of demolition produce low or little noise, as they work by thermal heating, in essence melting the steel rather than an explosive RDX charge which is considerably a lot louder.

Evidence from thermal imaginary over the site of the collapsed buildings showed extremely hot temperatures deep in the ground below the surface, even maintaining combustion under water.

No other element could both melt steel and be combustible under water.

The only explanation of this kind of heat source is an exothermic chemical reaction.

INVESTIGATIVE CONCLUSION

The official story that is told about the fate of the three buildings does not match the irrefutable evidence that is present.

Anyone who has a building, engineering, architectural and explosive expertise should examine the evidence and stand up and be counted as the rest of the World is relying upon us.

The World, especially the American people absolutely need the truth of what really happened.

The next logical step is to go back to the beginning and revisit every piece of evidence logically rather than rely of prefabricated story of events and then come to real conclusions.

STORING THE EVIDENCE ON THE BLOCKCHAIN

An independent investigation that stores all the evidence on the Blockchain is the only real solution.

An irrefutable Digital Distributed Leger that will: Store, Distribute, Verify, Validate and Evaluate every piece of evidence, no matter how tiny or insignificant one may think it is, has to be done.

What happened to those three buildings on that day is not something that will just simply go away.

This is very pertinent to us today and is probably one of the most single important Global Events of modern history.

Such an event deserves a full and thorough investigation irrespective of the outcome.

COMING TO TERMS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS

Most people who have lived with the events of that day have experienced some kind of trauma and it can be very difficult to come to terms with what actually did happen to the buildings.

I am sure that there would be some people who would simply disbelieve if the real truth was not the official story, simply because that they have believed it for so long.

This event had a tremendous impact on the majority of the World Population and despite the overwhelming evidence to suggest that the official story was incorrect some will chose to simply ignore the evidence as they themselves would be unable to process such information.

How people chose to come to terms with the reality of the possibility that the official story is not true will be down to the individual to decide.

When your beliefs are challenged your fear and anxiety take over. For some, it will be so difficult to even begin to challenge what they have been told if the reality of the events on that day had not been as they had been explained.

Effectively most people have felt very secure about what had been told and should the evidence show a totally irrefutable conclusion that the official story was not true it would in some cases leave them with a feeling that their very own security had been taken away.

When our beliefs are challenged to such an extent, it is our own characteristic that denial will kick in and take over.

On other words, if our beliefs choose to not accept reality, our minds shuts off as a defence mechanism to protect our feelings.

By not pursuing the events of that day disrespects the victims, families and all that were effected on that day and humanity owes this event to be re-investigated to a irrefutably scientific and logical conclusion.

Questioning and challenging is what we do best. It is what humanity is built around and not just accept what we are told is the truth.

In order to heal, the World needs the truth, and without this truth, The Wound of The World will never heal.

Is Blockchain about to unlock the secrets of the events of 9/11? I guess time will tell.

Thank you for reading.

Stephen

Sort:  

This post is a very important post. I have resteemed and will forward it to some people I think it can interest.

The fall of WTC 7 was mostly at free fall speed as it has been proven by this video analysis.

The official report for building WTC 7 collapse was again due to scattered office fires fuelled by office furnishings.

The building fell within approximately seven seconds at near free fall speed, falling straight down, symmetrically and to within its very own footprint.

Falling at this speed, the only way that this could be achieved would be by zero resistance and one that would need all steel columns to be severed at the same time simultaneously.

Thank you. I appreciate the support and resteem. I first typed a draft nearly a year ago and decided not to Blog it then. I felt there was no appetite for this stuff here on Steemit. When you see naked ladies and cupcakes earning $100's & $1,000's and this type of stuff barely getting noticed I thought I would wait. I have waited nearly 11 months to publish this and feel now is the time that the Community is slowly beginning to mature enough to warrant this type of Blog. Don't get me wrong, I have no problem with naked ladies and cupcakes doing great here, that's what makes Steemit so great, but I just felt that we needed to strength the numbers of users on the Platform that could handle this type of Blog. Once again, thank you for tremendous support of my work. Stephen

Great work Stephen and you're absolutely right, we're now able to have an intelligent conversation on 911 without getting emotional. I would recommend Dr Judy Wood's book "where did the towers go". It helped me to understand what could have happened to two of the tallest buildings on earth turned to dust. Not just the two towers. But, the buildings on the site.

The toasted cars, fine dust, surviving firefighters in the stairwell, no damage to the bathtub. These are just some of the questions that are asked in the book.

Thank you for sharing. This brings me an opportunity to tell about the person who was accused of all this attacks.
Please watch

man.. So many non-engineers who are like WE DON'T KNOW HOW IT CAME DOWN! No shit, you don't know anything about fire structural engineering. I am a Fire Protection Engineer. At the University of Maryland, we had a class where we re-did the calculations, spent the whole semester. There isn't anything fishy about how the towers fell structurally. I have access to stuff you guys have never seen because my professors were the ones who did the math. But you don't need that stuff to evaluate that there their collapse was plausible. For this to be a hoax, the amount of people you would have to have onboard with the biggest secret of all time is crazy. 1000s of people, 100s of scientists and engineers that studied the wreckage. There is a reason why you will probably only find 1 or 2 crackpots, if that, who were actually there in the months following working on the reports. The government was a completely open book at the site in the months following. I am a skeptical guy, but you guys are barking up the wrong tree. Did Bush make a mistake and not pay attention to his security briefings, yup, could some people in the saudi government have something to do with it? Yes. But no one blew up the towers.

I sold all my steem when I saw that poll that 95% of people here think 9/11 is a conspiracy. That is a dramatic amount of conspiracy minded people and doesn't bode well for the userbase of this site.

Here is why you all believe its a hoax or something: subconsciously, you are terrified that 13 guys with box cutters could do shit like that, and it is more comforting, ironically, to believe that there was some giant government conspiracy.

This stuff frustrates me so much. I should just ignore it, but yeah, disappointed in this site. Great idea, but when the community you attract off the bat is a bunch of dummies, it doesn't bode well.

It's interesting to see I was the first person you followed.

Can you provide us with all those calculation?

The "debunked" NIST report has all of the calculations in NCSTAR 1-2 & 1-3. Learn structural engineering and statics of steel under heat and then read 1-6.
https://www.nist.gov/engineering-laboratory/final-reports-nist-world-trade-center-disaster-investigation
And yeah, I thought you were actually a part of the steem team, you are pretty prolific. But none of you would have any idea what you are looking at even if i did bring some different proof. And you would just disagree with the assumptions that were made, that actually the steel came from some other place and its poisson's ratio is actually more like .24 etc. There is no winning here, I shouldn't have gotten involved.

The best proof I can give is that over a 100 normal people with families, maybe some even lost family members in the attacks, worked on those reports and the people at he forefront of the industry were called on to find out what happened. If you think that all of these people are in on it, then I pity you. So many people have spent "hundreds of hours" researching this stuff but it takes so much more than hundreds of hours to understand all of these concepts and then to study all of the evidence. I spent 4 years learning it and I have already forgotten 50% of it. People can do it, and I can lend you the textbooks if you are in the DC area heh, but the way people think about this conspiracy especially, frustrates me. Research /= watching videos made by other people who don't know anything analyzing fall speed. Or analyzing the fact that it fell "straight down" like a "controlled demolition". How else would it fall!?There aren't any forces pushing it in any direction, so when the structural members at the center are severely compromised around the impact floors where the damage spanned 6-10 floors and floors begin to collapse, they picked up speed and weight as they went and the whole building fell down.

The other thing about the WTC is that it was very poorly designed. If a skyscraper with its design was submitted today it would be laughed at. It was built in such a way that the exterior walls were loadbearing. It would not stand free with just the internal structural members. Some sort of fishy shit happened when the building was approved in the 50s and 60s, probably involving the mob. When they were built, they would build the central part of the building for a floor, and then build the walls for that floor, then move up to the next floor.

vs

This is not standard practice for skyscrapers, even then, and when 10 floors were CRUSHED by Boeing 767s, and then jet fuel poored down the internal shafts and started fires throughout the center of the building, yeah you bet it fell down. Another factor is that people say there was protection on the structural members! Yes this is true, they had very similar spray-applied insulation that we use today, but because that spray application happens early in a building's construction, every discipline that goes in there that follows needs to attach hangers to beams or drill through them, and they knock alot of that insulation off which compromises them to heat degradation. Also, the strength of the impact, a BOEING 767 200 TONS GOING AT 600 MPH, had the strength to knock off a good amount more of that insulation. Steel will lose half of its structural integrity around 550-600 degrees (and I am being generous). It doesn't have to melt to fail.

Alright.. what else, what things do you think are unexplainable? I will try to explain them

Also, even if you think I am a sheep, I did put some time into this response and it has some good stuff here so toss your man some steem ;)

Seriously then what is the temp of burning jet fuel?

The flash point of kerosene is between 37 and 65 °C (100 and 150 °F), and its autoignition temperature is 220 °C (428 °F). The pour point of kerosene depends on grade, with commercial aviation fuel standardized at −47 °C (−53 °F).
Kerosene - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerosene

Not even close to your graph of where the structural steel would begin to weaken. Your argument makes no sense for otherwise we would see melted exhaust manifolds laying in the streets. No planes hit the towers! And a poor example actually of video layering/cropping. Building 7! Right built by the mob!

I have explain them in my post that is not trending at the very top of steem. If you want to you can refute some of the peer-reviewed paper that I've listed in that post and publish your refutation in peer-reviewed journal feel free to do so.

I listed the NIST paper, that was fairly peer reviewed being the official independent study of the disaster. And then I listed a number of simple reasons, simple metallurgy, simple history about the building's construction and simple psychology explaining why I think its bullshit. You didn't respond to any of that and just talked about some popular post you have with some link to a peer reviewed article like that means that Bush bombed the towers. I have insight into this whole event that not many other people do, but its just like you guys to completely ignore all that. I have an understanding of this event down tothe minutes that noone on youtube has and I am willing to answer questions. This place fucking sucks if you are the most popular member here. Read my shit, listen to it, look at the report. I guarantee you haven't cracked open any of the actual reports or attempted to learn any of the math.

Your shit is half admirable, that you are able to sit and churn out the bullshit you do, I mean, you are seriously making a living writing paragraphs in 24 pt font about love and the "mysteries of life" with stock photos while I work 11 hours a day being a fire protection engineer to make half that. You know your audience, either you are very smart, know your audience is dumb and will respond to 9/11 conspiracies and esoteric lowest common denominator short essays, or you are a dummy, either way, kudos.

Can you actually show some of the calculations or at least hash out your defense more? Name calling, generalizing, and insulting the user base of a site does nothing but hurt your argument.

The "debunked" NIST report has all of the calculations in NCSTAR 1-2 & 1-3. Learn structural engineering and statics of steel under heat and then read 1-6.
https://www.nist.gov/engineering-laboratory/final-reports-nist-world-trade-center-disaster-investigation
But none of you would have any idea what you are looking at even if i did bring some different proof. And you would just disagree with the assumptions that were made, that actually the steel came from some other place and its poisson's ratio is actually more like .24 etc. There is no winning here, I shouldn't have gotten involved.

The best proof I can give is that over a 100 normal people with families, maybe some even lost family members in the attacks, worked on those reports and the people at he forefront of the industry were called on to find out what happened. If you think that all of these people are in on it, then I pity you. So many people have spent "hundreds of hours" researching this stuff but it takes so much more than hundreds of hours to understand all of these concepts and then to study all of the evidence. I spent 4 years learning it and I have already forgotten 50% of it. People can do it, and I can lend you the textbooks if you are in the DC area heh, but the way people think about this conspiracy especially, frustrates me. Research /= watching videos made by other people who don't know anything analyzing fall speed. Or analyzing the fact that it fell "straight down" like a "controlled demolition". How else would it fall!? There aren't any forces pushing it in any direction, so when the structural members at the center are severely compromised around the impact floors where the damage spanned 6-10 floors and floors begin to collapse, they picked up speed and weight as they went and the whole building fell down.

The other thing about the WTC is that it was very poorly designed. If a skyscraper with its design was submitted today it would be laughed at. It was built in such a way that the exterior walls were loadbearing. It would not stand free with just the internal structural members. Some sort of fishy shit happened when the building was approved in the 50s and 60s. When they were built, they would build the central part of the building for a floor, and then build the walls for that floor, then move up to the next floor.

vs

This is not standard practice for skyscrapers, even then, and when 10 floors were CRUSHED by Boeing 767s, and then jet fuel poored down the internal shafts and started fires throughout the center of the building, yeah you bet it fell down. Another factor is that people say there was protection on the structural members! Yes this is true, they had very similar spray-applied insulation that we use today, but because that spray application happens early in a building's construction, every discipline that goes in there that follows needs to attach hangers to beams or drill through them, and they knock alot of that insulation off which compromises them to heat degradation. Also, the strength of the impact, a BOEING 767 200 TONS GOING AT 600 MPH, had the strength to knock off a good amount more of that insulation. Steel will lose half of its structural integrity around 550-600 degrees (and I am being generous). It doesn't have to melt to fail.

Alright.. what else, what things do you think are unexplainable? I will try to explain them

Also, even if you think I am a sheep, I did put some time into this response and it has some good stuff here so toss your man some steem ;)

Are you threatening me!? My bungole will not wait!

Get Started Earning compounding Bitcoin Daily With USI-Tech !
USI-Tech are fully registered and in compliance with the SEC, the FTC and all United States Laws. You get paid daily and have the ability to withdraw your earnings at any time you decide to. https://ec40a397.usi-tech.info/ There is an average 1% daily payout for 5 days per week on BTC packages .You can choose an option to Auto Re-buy to compound earnings. All Profits are earned from forex and cryptocurrency trading and mining and are backed up by real proof that anyone can see for themselves.

This has been one of the leading sites with almost 3,000 ARCHITECT & ENGINEER signatures.
http://www.ae911truth.org/about.html
Here is their youtube site
https://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth

i do find that curious. I looked up about 40 names on linkedin and only found 1 with an actual account... 9/11 wasn't an inside job. I'm not an authority or a forensic engineer but theres no inside job and blockchain solving it is just as dumb as the conspiracy itself. I guess thats the internet tho, People believe anything on that there internet.

I would be willing to listen to any evidence you have but merely saying something without providing fact base evidence is how we have sheep in the first place.

Don't waste your time there are people who get paid to protect financial interests. War is a big business, they will stop at nothing to convince us what we saw on TV is true, it takes a person who has no attachment to the fakery spewed out by presidents and politicians who are ultimately professional criminals. This was known in the early 60's that they are all involved in mafias, and the death of Kennedy marks the last hope we had for a president that was trying to resolve the corruption before it became too big and the birth of the term "Conspiracy Theory" which was made by the CIA to shut down anyone who questioned his assassination. They brainwash people with entertainment like "Law and Order" "CSI Miami" and other bullshit I am unfamiliar with as I have turned off the TV for more than a decade, these are designed to mislead people into believing the CIA are good guys, that they do their job to make the country better. It is utter bullshit, corruption has sunken its roots deep into our system slowly after Kenndy's death, to the point where new words need to be invented to describe the evil that is being done to the domesticated sheep and to victims around the world. Cognitive dissonance disables one to believe the government is capable to let it happen or make it happen, and only those who subject themselves to propaganda will reject anything they don't want to hear. This is rare however, it is an era of information. More than likely the people you see responding this way are extremely ignorant, so extremely entertained by their job/life and the infinite amount of useless entertainment you see on TV, or doing their job to protect corporate interests to make more than average pay.

But we wont get anywhere if we cant engage people to at least think out everything they see or hear and not instantly use thought terminating words when they feel triggered.

I have no first hand evidence and you have no first hand evidence either. You weren't there during the event or the clean up after nor do you have a background in forensic engineering. Everything you see and read are things you saw or read on the internet and touting a fake list signatures to legitimize your suspicions is irresponsible. Even if I had evidence, I'm still just a nameless guy on the internet, why would you listen to me?

Yet again. You miss the point. With your latest comment you call the list of signatures fake with out any examples where your comment is factual. I am willing to hear you out but I need more than just saying it is fake. Or from your first comment " I looked up about 40 names on linkedin and only found 1 with an actual account". Here yet again I I would love you so show some proof of what you found.

also have you looked at any of the names? To see if any of those people are real. You're the one posting it. You don't even fact check your own posts, you just want to troll.

So instead of showing or explaining your comment you resort to the Word "troll"? Thats not giving me any confidence in your intellegents. If you are not willing to hold a conversation on your comment maybe you shouldnt have made it.

Talk trash all you want bud, you haven't provided any evidence either. Think I'm done here, have fun in your ma's basement.

Find my comment on this thread. You can ask me questions if you want. And im not getting paid to protect financial interests, jesus christ. I guess I am just bummed to see this social network fall down this rabbit hole of stupidity.

I am not sure how to reply to this. I do not understand the context you are referring too. Can you clarify your reply for me?

Yeah, sorry. I was trying to respond to "I would be willing to listen to any evidence you have but merely saying something without providing fact base evidence is how we have sheep in the first place." And I am mentioning the financial interest bit because of gamagoro's comment.

bankholiday Since you seem to have the inside track.. When will it be- the upcoming bank holiday?

Conspiracy? During a murderer crime, when was the last time you heard the phrase "conspiracy" throughout the investigation? Never, because during a crime, all evidence, all possible outcomes, and details are looked at regardless of what it may reveal. So to claim that the idea of reinvestigation of an International and Demoestic crime is "conspiracy" is not inly disgusting, its criminal in itself. Anyone whi claims conspiracies should be dropped and not talked about, also deserve complete investigation without immunity. This includes G. W. Busu, who himself said quote, "Conspiracies wont be tolerated", and thats a massive red flag to an investigation. But, alas, theres much evidence coming out now that 9/11 was an inside job, and its not even just Americans who know. Many people around the world are also aware it was fake. There is no conspiracy. Only an unsolved investigation.

There is no new evidence. It's the internet. Don't you think something that happened 15 years ago, there's not one university, not just american but anywhere in the world that has presented any explanation or evidence to bring validity to any of these fringe theories. Some people would rather believe the internet than the truth.

"bankholiday"
Wrong, there is new evidence. You'd understand this if you'd take the time to review the continuing investigations. Or even prior investigations. Especially those into Bldg 7. The 9/11 panel, after they were forced to conclude their investigation admitted to that they believed there was enough evidence to warrant charges for conspiracy to coverup. This is basic 9/11 knowledge. From 2006! And you're here arguing the same uneducated nonsense. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101300.html

15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi Nationals. Our allies to this day. GWB sealed 28 pages of the official report that outlined Saudi involvement, trying to hide the fact that the attack was supposedly carried out by our allies.

Even the White House Terror Chief Alleges CIA 9/11 Malfeasance and Cover Up.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/they-got-away-with-it-white-house-terror-chief-richard-clarke-alleges-cia-911-malfeasance-and-cover-up/

Firefighters that were there that day are still fighting to uncover the truth. These are professionals who saw and heard everything and refuse the official narrative.
https://www.ff911truthandunity.org/

Thousands of experts in engineering, aviation, architecture, senior military, law enforcement, government, & intelligence on record disputing or refuting the official investigation.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

"The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7."

  • Dr. André Rousseau
    Dr. Rousseau is a former researcher in geophysics and geology at the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) of France and a specialist in acoustic waves. He is also a member of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

I could on and on and on. But something tells me you won't bother. Because, like most Americans, you have an opinion and you're going to stick to it. Seriously, you think your responses here were in the least bit intellectual? You added nothing to the conversation. Have some pride in yourself and get educated, your sniping is pathetic.

how do you define new evidence as something that came out from 2006? Define educated too. You got a GED or something like that?

Typical lazy response. If you bothered to click through the links, you would have found more than an article from '06 including peer reviewed studies and up-to-date studies on Bldg 7. You might want to check your grammar before trying to make a snarky response about my potential level of education. Stay the fuck out of this debate if you're not willing to take it seriously. There are families out there still trying to get to the truth of who murdered their loved ones, and all you're doing is proving what a know-it-all know-nothing you are while polluting the debate with snipe comments that mean and add nothing.

lol u mad? What families don't accept the truth of what happened? It's not a debate, much like the holocaust or sandy hook, what happened happened. Could we have done more to prevent it? Absolutely, unfortunately hind sight is always 20/20. But keeping these nameless and faceless accusations out that it was a hoax, or an inside job, or something else sinister is simply nonsense. So u guys can keep armchair engineering as much as you want, but you're wrong and need to get on with your lives. The blockchain isn't solving a damn thing here.

I will agree there are some wild speculation on what happened that day other than what we saw. But there are some pretty solid science based fact that do not work with the official narrative of what occurred. I don't want to get into speculation. I merely want to debate the hard science proposed by other scientist. I would like to see another investigation.

What scientists and from where? What branch of science? Do you even know which branch would be most relevant? Don't use words like "fact" and "hard science". Names, credible institutions, not trolls.

You were the first to "troll". So if you don't have any intelligent response maybe you shouldn't be making any comments.

"i do find that curious. I looked up about 40 names on linkedin and only found 1 with an actual account... 9/11 wasn't an inside job. I'm not an authority or a forensic engineer but theres no inside job and blockchain solving it is just as dumb as the conspiracy itself. I guess thats the internet tho, People believe anything on that there internet."
Your first comment. Does that fit your definition of a "troll"?

This is exactly what I am talking about. STEEMIT could be the very platform that these guys and many others have been waiting for and could use straight away. A decentralised, shared, distributed and irrefutable platform to hold recorded evidence. Stephen

A trooper to the cause. There are some great guys there. I drafted this Blog 11 months ago and decided to wait a bit until I felt there were enough here to appreciate it. I have noticed recently more are coming out and challenging the narrative. Blockchain is set give them a voice now and expect others to follow. Stephen

Great post Stephen! I've done a few documentaries on this subject and I have many of the same questions I had in 2003 when I first started questioning the official story.
I went to college for architecture and engineering and while I didn't take it up for a living, the most basic principles raise SERIOUS questions about 9/11. Not to mention the most basic physics as well as the questionable motives, evidence and eyewitness testimony.
Great work Stephen. Resteemed!

Thanks Josh. I was on site that day and like most, will never forget it. I rushed off to watch the towers in smoke and then when they collapsed I kept saying "where's the steel gone?" I have known for 16 years that the Mainstream Narrative is not true and most don't believe me. I was going to publish this Blog when I first started on Steemit but decided to wait until more guys like you were here. I have noticed that over the last few months more and more are coming out of the woodwork on this subject more so than I have ever seen in the last 16 years. Blockchain is set to play a massive role in finding out the real truth not only for 9/11 but everything else that has gone on since the 1970's. Stephen

We can record history on the blockchain as it happens and not worry about it being rewritten or censored later.

"We can record history on the blockchain as it happens and not worry about it being rewritten or censored later."

"We can record history on the blockchain as it happens and not worry about it being rewritten or censored later."

"We can record history on the blockchain as it happens and not worry about it being rewritten or censored later."

Some things are so true, they are worth repeating. Thank you for the comment. Stephen

some things should never be allowed to be swept under the carpet

I have upvoted and am definitely following..I've been obsessed with this for a long time and everything I am reading is everything I try to explain to people when they give me that look. There was an ex cia agent who made multiple appearances and videos telling how she was told and her colleagues some information about it days before and to not be in New York that day..they can't explain how the pentagons hole is half the size of the wingspan of a plane. This is so interesting thank you!

Thank you for your comment and support. I remember the day it happened. I was on a construction site and ran off to the local hotel to watch it on TV. As we were watching it unfold all I kept saying was, "where's the steel gone?" Everyone around me were in shock and disbelief about the event and I all kept repeating was "where's the steel gone?" For the last 16 years when anyone has mentioned this event I say the exactly the same thing "where's the steel gone?" Stephen

Trucks for months coming in and leaving before people showed up..enough time to do something, but hopefully with research like yours as others people will learn to swallow truth instead of being scared to question things.

Great article!! get it stored on the blockchain!
As a chartered engineer and having worked for 11 years in the heavy construction indusrty, here are the ONLY TWO facts that i like to focus on:

  1. Jane Standley from the BBC reported that WTC7 had fallen down 23 minutes early... oops!
  2. WTC7 is the first steel column building in history to fall down due to office fires. there are at least 25 other previous cases where the building burned longer and hotter and never fell down in the last 100 years (The Grenfeld tower disaster is the latest example). That alone is not the end of the story. since WTC7 is the first high rise building to collapse due to office fires this sets a precedent, should we accept the official story (that collapse was due to office fires) now all high rise buildings in the world could collapse due to office fires. So the question is, why isn't there a world wide programme to upgrade the main structural support fireproofing in order to avoid the potential threat of collapse due to office fires?

LOL

"...why isn't there a world wide programme to upgrade the main structural support fireproofing in order to avoid the potential threat of collapse due to office fires?"

Because the people that would have to fund it know better.

People with immense holdings of capital tend to be fairly practically minded, and it is impossible that office fires caused these building collapses.

Thermite/thermate.

Not to mention that if you crash aluminum into steel it is the aluminum that is deformed. The Pentagon was not pierced by a plane, but a shaped charge.

I always wondered why a proper investigation wasn't done. Upvoted resteemed

So do I! Upvoted & resteemed.

Very interesting! Upvoted and resteemed so my dad can see it!

Having researched 911 for many years and being in the process of making a documentary about it - I have seen first hand how the mainstream 'social networks' silence and limit sharing of valid information about 911. I do intend to use Steemit for 911 Truth in the near future. I was actually working, at the time of 911, for a software company whose clients were international investment banks and some of our clients were in the towers... It is not impossible that I could have died that day and that is just one of a very, very long list of reasons why I will never stop exposing the crimes of that day and every day since!

I hope the truth will come ...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.36
TRX 0.12
JST 0.040
BTC 70839.13
ETH 3563.41
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.77