Is Harry really King Charles's son?

Let's look at this from the point of view of King Charles's astrological chart:

When William was born, transiting Jupiter was at 0° 29' Scorpio, exactly opposite Charles's Moon. Charles was experiencing the first moment of true joy he'd had in years. Here is what the astrologylibrary has to say about this transit:

When Jupiter transits opposite to your natal Moon your relationships are very good and rewarding. This transit can even give results to the sacrifices or sufferings that you have had for years.

So Charles made a sacrifice by marrying Diana, and got rewarded by the birth of William.

HOWEVER, when Prince Harry was born, Pluto was at 0° 33' Scorpio, exaxtly opposite Charles's Moon. This is devastating. The astrolibrary says,

When transit Pluto is opposite your natal Moon, it produces confrontations with other people when there are manipulation attempts.

Diana told Andrew Morton that Charles took one look at the newborn Harry and was upset because of how he looked (she implied it was to do with Harry's red hair). More likely Charles realised Diana was trying to manipulate him into accepting someone else's son. Cuckolding a future king is a huge diss. The Pluto transit to Charles's Moon (emotion) implies devastating emotional hurt.

Harry complains in his book that the Royal Family treated him differently. This is probably true - there was probably subtle unconscious manifestation of something they all knew - which was that he wasn't one of them, he didn't belong, he was a cuckoo in their nest.