You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Trump's Immigration Plan is Ridiculous (Raw Liberty 24)
Where voluntary communities are concerned, do you advocate making use of existing CC&Rs, which can be viewed as a contract of adhesion -- where such decisions are enforced by an elected board -- or would you recreate the jurisdiction of a community to only include those households who would agree to such policies as part of their common law right to use their land for lawful purposes?
All existing voluntary agreements should IMHO be grandfathered in. But it's ultimately the decision of each property owner. In the situation of a community of apartments or houses, there's going to have to be cooperation in order for it to continue working.
I live in a community with about 120 other families and we vote as a group and for a junta. I have no problem with it because it's a private and voluntary organization with highly limited powers, like a corporation or a co-op.
Frankly, I don't see that many things about the law and agreements changing in a transition to a voluntary society. Most things will still work as they do now. It's just that governance will be decentralized and by consent only.
To specifically answer your question, it depends on the community. If it's a tower, people have to cooperate for it to work. If it's duplex houses, ditto. If it's houses on a street with a gate at the front, less cooperation is required. Ultimately, each community has to work it out amongst themselves.
What do you think?
Sorry for the late reply. Just noticed this. Steemit settings to be notified of replies to comments?
My concern is the tyranny of the majority. Yes, people need to work together or cooperate, but it doesn't have to be done at the expense of individuality and diversity. It will all depend upon what minimum level of individual and property rights are mandated to be preserved and can't be overridden by that majority.