The most effective method to write a food review

The job of a food reviewer is to accurately convey the taste, texture, smell and presentation of a restaurant's food. It not only comments on the food but also on the atmosphere, the knowledge and attention of the staff, the speed of the service, the general impression of the restaurant or the cafeteria. An excellent food check puts the reader at your table, allowing them to decide whether or not they want to visit the restaurant when they have finished reading.

Do some background research. Once you have eaten and taken your notes, take some time to see what the restaurant's history is. These types of details are an excellent way to add a little color to your opinion. For example, you might discover that the head chef was trained in France or used to work at another well-liked restaurant in the area, and you can use these connections to get people interested in the food.

Start by reading the restaurant's website. Look for the owner and the executive chef to get an idea of ​​their training, style and past adventures.

Open your review with a compelling hook. The first sentence of the review should make people want to read more. Remember, you are giving them a reason to spend your money in this restaurant or skip somewhere else, but you are also trying to read their writing. Some tips for a good hook include:

Promise a story or a surprise, as "it may have taken a while to reach my mouth, but I found the best paella on the planet". Be sure, however, to keep the promise later!
Give an interesting and tangential fact, such as "Chef Zurlo started cooking just 2 years ago, but he has quickly moved up the ranks to operate the best new bagel shop in Oakland."
Describe a particularly captivating or compelling part of the environment, good or bad, such as a great view or a strange smell in the kitchen.

Describe 3-5 dishes from which you took samples, not all. No one wants to read a list of foods, so choose the foods that made the most impression (good or bad) and focus your writing on these dishes. Do not just say if they were good or bad. Strive to give details and reasons, naming each specific dish. As a schematic, you should try to talk about the following three things in each food check

Presentation: How did the plate look when it arrived, and how did it make you feel? Excited? Hungry? Like royalty? As if you were in your family kitchen again?
Taste: The big, obvious, but that's only because it's very important. Use descriptive language, metaphor and simile to put your reader in your shoes or in your mouth. Name spices or flavors when you can.
Texture: This usually includes the cooking process as well. Did it melt in your mouth? Was it still hot when it arrived? Was it juicy and tender or hard and brittle? Were your multiple textures (like something soft with a crispy crust) and worked well together?

Use large and colorful adjectives when writing. Remember that, above all, you are selling the experience here, not just the food. Feel free to be poetic with your writing in places, using 1-2 well-placed adjectives so that the reader knows exactly what to expect in the restaurant. You can think of it, in a way, since the brief history of your trip provides details and colorful additions that make the restaurant stand out and feel unique.

This includes the atmosphere, the surface and the location. The more specific details, the better. Try a good touch on each interaction / part of the restaurant.

Think about the intentions of a restaurant, not just your personal preferences. A good food review is about helping other people find the restaurant, not just a platform to tell all their likes and dislikes. For example, if you go to a restaurant with retro art on the walls and roller skating dancers, it is not fair to judge the restaurant for its specialty in burgers and fries instead of oysters. A good reviewer is as impartial as possible, evaluating the restaurant as a whole.

What kind of atmosphere are you going to have here? Do they succeed?
How do your preferences match with restaurants? If you hate seafood, but that's the specialty of the restaurant, you might want to soften the negative reviews of the salmon or tell your readers that, in general, you're not a fan of fish.

Write a mixture of pros and cons. Unless it is the best restaurant in which you have eaten or the worst, it is not fair to write a review that is good or bad. Try to give your audience the full picture. This finally allows the reader to make their own decision based on their advice, which seems much more reason

(thank you for watching I hope you enjoyed share this blog and follow me if want any related about this article comment me thank you for watching)

**learn more about: https://goo.gl/ZfIJlT **