modern science .

when Gregor Mendel began his investigation of plant genetic in the 1800s, he worked alone -a middle -aged European monk counting peas in the abbey garden. one hundred and fifty years later , modern plant genetics laboratories, like Chelsea specht's, look a lot more diverse and employ the latest DNA sequencing techniques. when j.j. 

Thomson discovered a new particle of matter -the electron -at the turn of the century, his lab equipment mainly consisted of vacuum tubes, magnets, and some simple wiring. one hundred years later, scientists searching for new particles like the higgs boson use a supper collider -a 17-mile-long machine that costs several billion dollars and will produce data to be analyzed by the most powerful supercomputer in the world. science has come a long way in the last 150 years ! we , we now have more powerful data analysis techniques, more sophisticated equipment for making observations and running experiments, and a much greater breadth and depth of scientific knowledge. and as the attitudes of the broader society have progressed, science has benefited from the expanding deversity of perspectives offered by its participants. but what about the process of science itself? has his fundamental aspect of the scientific enterprise changed over time ? .

science will always look for explanations for what goes on the natural world and test those explantantion against evidence from the natural world , but exactly how this gets done may evolve. the scientific enterprise is not static . science is deeply interwoven with society , and as it changed , so too has science . here are just a few examples of how modern scientific parcites have been transformed by increasing knowledge , changing societal concerns , and advance in communication and technology 

source http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/modern_science