A lot of people are fighting for their rights, but do you really know what that means?  Has anybody looked up the word 'right' and do you really want to fight or go to war for it?

Right
1. The standard of permitted and forbidden action within a certain sphere; law; a rule or canon.
2.  That which is consonant with equity or the light of nature; that which is morally just or due. (often contracted with might or wrong)
3.  Just or equitable treatment; fairness in decisions; justice.  
4.  With reason or justice
5.  that which is right; righteousness, justice, truth; specially the cause of truth or justice.
- Oxford Unabridged Dictionary (1958)

I'm going to refer people back to my post regarding the English language which you can re-read here.  The point of the post was to outline how the powers that be use the English language to hoodwink people because of our ignorance.  When people start referencing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the powers that be do not interpret the feudal serfs efforts for righteousness, justice or truth, but instead interpret the efforts in regards to the first definition, permitted or forbidden action within a sphere.  

Most people unwittingly fight for definition #1, which is a parent / child relationship type right.  

This is really important to make this distinction as parents are responsible for outlining what is permitted and forbidden within their relationships with the children.  If you have been following along in my blog, I have made it VERY clear that the relationship that the people have with the state is a parent / child relationship that functions using feudal tenures and protocols.  Within that feudal protocol, when people swear allegiance to their king, it is the kings responsibility to outline what he will accept or forbid.  

A most enlightening read is Sir William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England which was written between 1765 - 1769 and outlines what the king accepts as right or wrong.  Yes, it even describes the system within the US and all the other commonwealth countries in the world as they were all heavily influenced by England.  It works through the feudal system and even outlines much of the feudal protocols in use then and now within these commentaries. 

I want to make it VERY clear that I do NOT fight for rights within the kings sphere, but rather I stand as a guardian and steward for equitable treatment, righteousness, reason, peace, freedom, moral and ethical integrity.  That is the rights that I talk about, not the rights that people often fight for with their feudal parental lords.  I don't fight (go to war) for justice (to rule, govern), but rather declare peace for justice (the quality of being morally just or righteous).  See how confusing English can be?  

Except the rights that I speak of actually do fit into a sphere, the Spiritual Realm as granted to us by Creator.  These Natural Rights still have 'right' and 'wrong' but they are not outlined by any man made laws or customs but instead have been described using the term 'Natural Rights' or 'inalienable rights'.    

 Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable (i.e., rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws). ... The concept of natural law is related to the concept of natural rights. - Wikipedia

However, with our free will, we can surrender these rights in exchange for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  We do that when we abandon Creator and swear fealty to an earthly lord and master, as 36+ million people have done in 'Canada' with their participation with the state.  So if you find that you are one of these people, then let's do a quick review as there are protections within the charter that can help with the transition to Spiritual Centric freedom.

While the Charter is a feudal document created by the King (Queen Elizabeth II in England) to outline the sphere for his / her children, it is a grant that outlines what he / she thinks is 'right' and 'wrong' within the realm, made clear through Blackstone's Commentaries.  

The Canadian Chart of Rights and Freedoms is no different.  It is a piece of British legislation (not Canadian), passed in 1982 and brought to Canada by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau.  

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms can be used as the hand cuffs to bind all those who choose to work for the government.  The Charter does not apply specifically to the people but rather only applies to the individuals who chose to serve in the government.  If these individuals were honourable, they would recognize that the charter is the boundary that shall not be crossed and should be approached with great trepidation and fear as it is a command from their king to protect the citizens of Canada.  But more frequently than not, that boundary is being breached with little or no regard.  It is not the courts responsibility to hold these people accountable, it is the peoples and this is one of the tools people can use to put them back into their box and hand cuff them to the wall if necessary.

 32. (1) This Charter applies    

a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all  matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters  relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of  all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.   - Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982)

Annotated Charter of Rights and Freedoms

If you are serious about doing your civic duty and binding the government to the wall, then the Annotated Charter of Rights and Freedom is a powerful read. There are on line versions as well as books that can be purchased.  

Essentially, what the Annotated Charter of Rights and Freedoms is; a break down of each section of the charter with court rulings to explain how the courts have been interpreting each section in great detail.  It explains what the government and police is allowed to do and more importantly, not allowed to do while interacting with people.  It describes the box (jurisdiction) upon which they must operate within and they are not allowed to breach those boundaries.  They must stay within the box!!!

However, when they do breach the boundaries, it is up to the individuals to do something about it in order to put them back into the box.  If those individuals fail to do that, then we end up with rogue agents of the state who go on to do further harm to others.

Keep in mind that we are sacred, limitless spiritual beings of unimaginable power and creativity.  As such, it is not possible to even contemplate our limits but we must still do so within the Spiritual Sphere granted to us by Creator.  It is far superior than the Charter, however it is helpful to learn the Charter and what it means if one is going to venture out of the system to stand in Spiritual peace, freedom and righteousness and help others to do the same.  

Due to the complexities of the Charter, I will work hard to explain in simple terms how it works in the next few days so that feudal citizens can start to recognize how important their duty is to keep the government hand cuffed.  Hint:  I've talked about it a lot already, especially with my "Don't Talk to the Police" blog entries.  

I refuse to engage in violence, so I've taken a different path.  However, this information is still important so that behaviours can be rebuked and exposed so that we can stand as witnesses to the violence and testify to it all.  

Stay tuned as I embark on a journey through the Charter and explore ideas on how citizens can protect themselves from a state that seems to have gone rogue.