Catalonia will have independence referendum

The desire for secession is cyclical. And today, not exactly a pink atmosphere in Europe or better in the Eurozone - emphasizes this passion even more. Dissatisfaction is rising, but not everyone is able to assess the real causes that have led to such dissatisfaction (or maybe they only suspect).

source: http://g8fip1kplyr33r3krz5b97d1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/GettyImages-634001272-1160x773

Basques have essentially a national identity, but the Spanish majority, in fact, denounced the authorities and imposed on them Spanish language and Spanish supremacy. Baskets have literature, language and other attributes of the nation, but they do not have autonomous rights. They are prohibited from having referendum on independence. In Basque in France is even worse. The Basques as a nation have the right to self-determination according to international law, as well as the Scots, Wales in GB, and more....

It's logical that you get on the first - the nearest - and that's national authorities. Today, national authorities have increasingly limited decision-making functions. To say that the problems of Spain depend on the Spanish authorities is wrong.

The rules / contracts / provisions are written down and the state power can be maintained. Strictly. Well, Spain got the most from "Brussels", and it was not even so much sanctioned. In short, the gap between national political representatives and the people ....is rising, and the main reasons lie in the Brussels neoliberal center. The Spanish situation, however, has been special even before. For example, we could also mention Italy, where many parts in the north (Lombardy, Veneto, ...) are buzzing about exactly the same reasons and they are exemplifying a secession - with so much emphasis now that we have really take in deep in such a Europe and its rules. Mantra is always "the rich south keeps the poor north", which is only partially true. It is forgotten how the south has been depleted in the past, so that the north could have been built.

source: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/szymonlukasik/3107944643/

Public debts that intimidate people how serious this is, is one big prank. Firstly, because they are in the best part of a hostile nature, and secondly because they have sovereign debt (albeit large), especially at this particular moment, it should not mean that they should not be invested with public funds - for example - in a single State economies, as requested by the EU and financial institutions. During the crisis, public spending is the only way to draw 'blood' into a (real) economy. Otherwise, there is anemia and death. Public debt becomes a problem only if the state economy does not grow and if the state does not have its own currency (or monetary sovereignty). Last but not least, debts differ from one another. They were created by the states themselves by printing money, and that same debt has been transformed or recorded as a debt that the states opened with a foreign creditor - on the market in short - which is crazy or worthy of imprisonment for gentlemen who want to be so shown. The economic policy of a state must be governed by economic circumstances, I suppose. In view of the crisis, it would therefore be reasonably likely to expect greater public investment from budget funds. Exactly what the EU will never allow us to do.