Hey steemit friends and everyone else. Today I found myself with multiple stories, all of which I wanted to gut punch, so that's what I'm doing. 3 separate stories, 3 separate Agendas vs VenomnymouS. Let's do this!

Story 1

source

“We’ve already given four tickets ... Obviously, the gloves are off at this point,” said Const. Brett Chipchase, who set up across the street from Dr. Donald Massey School in northeast Edmonton on Tuesday morning."

Ok well first off traffic tickets are nothing more than racketeering for the city bank account. You know this, police know this, and the city knows this. It doesn't stop people from driving poorly, as long as they don't get caught. But, that's why the city puts up more and more photo enforced cameras everywhere. Because cops can't be everywhere to bring in the shekels.

“There’s no excuse for speeding through a school zone anymore.”

I agree with this statement until the next paragraph.

"Council voted last fall to implement 30 km/h speed limits in playground zones and schools zones from 7:30 a.m. to 9 p.m. every day. The 407 zones are marked by reflective poles and new signs that have been going up since November."

Okay SERIOUSLY!? 7:30 until 9pm at night, every day.. Including the weekend? Who in the fuck's kid is on school grounds at 8:30 at night? No one! Now my family has to drive through several schools zones on the way home (depending where we're heading from) and it is the most ridiculous thing. But, we do it because we ain't risking a stupid ticket. After we exit the school zones, we hit a construction zone because of the massive train expansion in our city. That is also a 30km zone, so we're talking a really slow ride home from that direction.

Now it's my theory that this school zone business is more than a cash grab. It's to add to the increasing efforts to discourage motor vehicle use in the city. Yes, they don't want people to drive cars. They want motorists so frustrated with motor transportation, they sooner ride a bicycle or hop a bus or train, than try to navigate the ins and outs of the ever complicating roadways. Making those barricaded bike lanes look better every week. It's better for your health and the environment don't ya know 😉.

Below are some excerpts from my article

'Pedaling' an Agenda: How all bike lanes lead to Agenda 2030

---

“I found it stressful thinking about where to park it and driving such a big vehicle and I’m not used to that,” Gaherty said. “(The bike) was much easier to manoeuvre. I could just get it up to the sidewalk in front of my new house.”

source

"Moving to 'active transit'

"Lest there be doubt about what the state’s after, the draft rules require cities like Bend to “establish performance measures and targets … that measure progress toward increasing transportation choices and reducing reliance upon the automobile.” Nope, no war on cars going on at all. The rules go on to describe the ways in which cities, through the adoption of transportation system plans, ought to conduct their anti-car battles. To this end, the draft rules provide some options.

Cities, for example, may adopt a set of “performance measures and targets” that produce “a significant increase in the availability or convenience of modes of transportation other than the automobile” and result “in a reduction in reliance on the automobile.” These targets must be measurable and reportable to the state.

Alternatively, cities may adopt a per-capita target for vehicle miles driven, which must decline by 5 percent over 20 years."

"Welcome to your driverless future"

There's a lot more in the article. I recommend you check it out.

---

Story 2

source

“It’s hard to say,” Niels B. Christiansen said by phone from Lego’s headquarters in western Denmark. “I’m not even sure that we currently yet can live up to the quality that we want. But it’s an agenda that we want to drive and an agenda that our owner is behind. We want to become a leader on this.”

Lmao, oh man! 2030 has to be the most exciting year in history. Nearly everything in the future is set to happen then. Don't believe me. Check out my post below.

By The Year 2030: The Use of "2030" in Mainstream Media

---

How often do you see lego floating around in the ocean? No seriously, how often? Once? Twice? Never?

This move by Lego makes no sense. But, it doesn't have to. It's a part of the push to ban plastics. Like the recent attack on plastic straws lol. Now isn't it funny how people have no self control when it comes to something like ordering crap from a fast food chain or a restaurant that they would actually beg daddy gov to take away their little straws for them? Yet again, it's because people are dumb and only care about issues that the media makes a point for them to care about. Usually one of these issue will last about a week or two until they move your attention onto something else. Lest it's a really big agenda, like the man made climate change (CC=33) hoax. That's in the news every single stinking day!

But what makes this single use plastic banning issue a laughing matter. Is the fact that it has hardly any impact on the ocean at all. The biggest culprit is commercial fishing.

source

"Microplastics make up 94 percent of an estimated 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic in the patch. But that only amounts to eight percent of the total tonnage. As it turns out, of the 79,000 metric tons of plastic in the patch, most of it is abandoned fishing gear—not plastic bottles or packaging drawing headlines today."

"A comprehensive new study by Slat’s team of scientists, published in Scientific Reports Thursday, concluded that the 79,000 tons was four to 16 times larger than has been previously estimated for the patch. The study also found that fishing nets account for 46 percent of the trash, with the majority of the rest composed of other fishing industry gear, including ropes, oyster spacers, eel traps, crates, and baskets. Scientists estimate that 20 percent of the debris is from the 2011 Japanese tsunami."

Yes, see now If you really want to cut the plastic out of the ocean. You ought to give up eating fish. Or perhaps you only eat what you catch yourselves. But I seriously doubt people doing that or crying for their daddy to put a ban on fish sales, will they?

---

Last but not least, story 3

source

"The practice of eating bugs isn’t uncommon outside of North America — specifically Asia and Africa — but Leung said it could be years before Canadian health agencies approve insects for human consumption. Nonetheless, she said, it’s on the horizon for Enterra.

“We would love to feed people directly ... but in the meantime, we’d love to feed animals.”

⬆️ There ya go, says it all right there.

Below are excerpts from my article

BUGS: Agenda 2030 Diet Of The Future.

---

"Cricket powder will add a subtle nutty or earthly flavour to a wide variety of dishes; if you use a small amount, you won’t taste it at all."

In other words, it actually tastes like dirt. Mmm mmm!

"It was now day six of my seven-day entomophagy trial, and I wasn’t any closer to adopting bugs into my diet. And with that realization, I decided the world has no hope. If I’m reluctant to eat bugs, what’s the likelihood of a blue collar type in a conservative seat adopting entomophagy in front of his mates? None, I thought. No chance at all."

source

"Indeed, before I personally can consider cricket flour a sustainable alternative to beef, pork or poultry, cricket cultivation will also need to become more cost effective. In the meantime, I'm committed to overcoming my societal aversion to eating bugs. To me, entomophagy is more than a trend, it is a revolution."

"In a small bowl, combine flour, baking soda and salt. Set aside. In a large bowl, combine butter, sugar, brown sugar and vanilla and beat until creamy. Beat in eggs. Gradually add cricket flour mixture and mix well. Stir in chocolate chips."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you are substituting wheat flour for cricket flour in the name of sustainability, but still adding eggs and butter regular flour to the mix. Where's the sustainability in that? What did it replace?

I mean, I can make those same cookies, without eggs and without dairy butter. And have a better tasting, more sustainable cookie than their gritty bug cookie. LoL

"With a current world population of 7.2 billion, the United Nations is projecting an increase of 1 billion people over the next 12 years, and 9.6 billion by 2050. To meet the population’s needs, our food system is in transition. We need to produce, transport, sell and prepare more food, more efficiently. But which foods, and what kind of transportation?"

source

1 billion more people in the next 12 years huh? Interesting, what year would that be hmmm? Oh yeah! 2030! Ya know, like UN Agenda2030 (formerly known as Agenda21). Oh what a coincidence! Hmm... that's really funny because agenda 2030 is all about sustainable development.

Lot more in that article, please go and check it out I you have the time.

---

There you have it. 3 Stories, 3 Agendas all destroyed. I thank you for reading and hopefully you'll check out my other steemit posts on the topics. Please leave your questions, comments or complaints in the comment section below. Have a super awesome day!

---