English Version On Todays Article:

Title: Some Improvements in the Rating Mechanism of "Monthly Day Review"

 Some students have asked me about WeChat. His article added “Review on the Moonlight Day.” Why (the judges) did not read his article?

Some students also asked why their articles could not enter the recommended finalists?
　　

Many people have asked me before the above questions, and here I will explain them together.
　　

The “Monthly Day Review” is an important long-term activity project organized by the community on a monthly basis. Every week, the jury team teachers recommend excellent works every Friday evening, which currently includes both literature and art. A public public vote was held, and the highest scorer won the best prize of the current period.
　　

According to the data released by @dapeng yesterday afternoon in the judging panel, the “Monthly Review” had a maximum of 500 works. It has recently declined to 300 works, and the recommended works are from here. In fact, our judges, including myself, will often look to see if there is a better work. It is only when we discover a good work that we will recommend it. We also considered commenting on the comments made by the judges and teachers, but the amount of work was too great and obviously inappropriate. I also considered using robots to respond to each work that participated in “The Moonlight Review,” but I don’t think it would be appropriate to do so, but the judges did read the work of everyone. Some errors may have been missed, but Do not be discouraged, continue to participate, and make persistent efforts. The “Monthly Review” is held every month for a long time and has always been there to welcome everyone . 

 Why is the work not recommended?
　　

This reason may be more, I briefly discuss some of the key.
　　

As we all know, the “Monthly Review” has a public open voting session every month from the end of the month to the beginning of the month. It is for everyone to vote out the works that have been recommended for selection and select some of the works that you think are the best. These votes are combined with the scores of the previous panel of judges. The final score is ranked from highest to lowest, and the highest rank is the best winner. 

 It should be noted here that generally, when the voting session is conducted, our judging panel teachers will take a few days off. In other words, during the public voting period, the judging panel teachers will no longer make recommendations , and some students may Did not pay attention, just to participate in these few days, this is one of the reasons that caused the work to be missed may not be recommended for inclusion.
　　

Second, about the rating of the judges. There have been some cases where my classmates asked me about the rating of the judges. I have not made public explanations yet. In fact, the standards of each judge’s teacher are not the same . We also respect the evaluation criteria of each teacher. However, because of their human nature, it is inevitable that judges will score differently . 

For this, yesterday afternoon we also discussed in the judging panel group. In the end we made some improvements. Each teacher from the previous judging panel scored independently and changed it to be scored by the teachers in a unified manner. Finally, the scores of the teachers were performed. After the average, the final average score is the score of the work . This score plus the public vote (1 point for each vote) is the final total score of the work .

Of course, since there is a unified score, the time for scoring will be set at the same time as the public voting. That is, public voting will be conducted at the same time as the judges of the jury team.
　　

We also took into account that the scores of teachers in the judging panel should not be cross-referenced, because we have found a tool on the Internet to be used for the follow-up teachers in each judging panel to score independently. The scores between each jury are independent and not mutually exclusive. Affected. 

This article written by my friend: rivalhw 

• Thanks my friend for your kind of words.

• Have a good day!