There is no continuity of trumps

Trump, as he has been successful in his Asia tour, US mainstream media, former diplomats and Asia experts disagree with him. Some people say that this tour is disastrous for the United States. Others say that the success of the trump is saying that it is very much one

Not achieved Many people also say that the tremor in China's tour has been crushed. And a Barack Obama administration official said that Trump made China a great place instead of making the United States great.

The fact is, this tour is not as successful as Trump claims, but many people say that this tour has been disastrous, not even that. In some cases it was rather successful, if we compare it with his first visit as his president; In that tour he talked a lot of unknowingly. However, with some minor mistakes, his visit ended quite unconditionally. Earlier in 1992, then US President George HW Bush visited such a long Asia tour.

But Asian leaders warmly received Trump from European allies. China has welcomed him by spreading more red carpet than Lal. This tour is referred to as 'something more than a state tour'. Even after 1949, it was the first time that a foreign head of state played food in the city or the Forbidden City with the Chinese President. Some may argue that China has given so much splendor to the trump by giving him some important recognition and exemption from Trump. It seems to be true. US Presidents are generally considered to be the leaders of the free world, this time the US President flush to China and his authoritarian president. Trump C is considered as a very special man by China Ping.

In the election campaign, Trump complained that China raped the US economy. But now without criticizing the country, Trump praises China for taking advantage of US trade benefits. Without referring to China's finger, he criticized predecessors for the United States with a huge trade deficit (more than 350 billion in 2016). Despite the warm reception, despite all the treaty and the issues he mentioned, he was not humiliated in Beijing, and did not return empty handed from the four countries. On Wednesday, he said,
he went to Asia with three million goals; One of which was 'to emphasize fair and bilateral trade'.
He made it clear everywhere including Beijing, your conference, that the trade relations between the countries of this region, especially China, are very unfair, unequal and fragile. And such a long imbalance must be refined.

Many people say that Trump is the president of the transaction, but they just say. Many do not like it again. But the trade-related position of the President who has been elected primarily to keep his country in the forefront, seems to have worked well. During this visit, he made a total of $ 30 billion worth of investment and trade treaty, of which only $ 25 billion was signed with China. These agreements include selling US products to other Asian countries including China and investing in the United States.

However, US Secretary of State Rex Tyleron acknowledged that the contracts that have been signed during this visit are incompatible with trade deficit. But if the United States wants to balance the trade, then it has to start somewhere from somewhere. In that case these agreements can be important as the first step. And after leaving Trump Beijing, China has lifted the foreign ownership limit in its bank and asset management company. China was already thinking of liberalization of the financial sector, but it can not be said that it happened simultaneously. It may be the beginning of the trump due to the mutual talk or courtesy of Beijing.

In fact, people think that when Trump speaks just about economic and mutual respect, then there is a logical reason. To achieve this goal or to achieve this, not just the United States, Asian countries will also benefit, with China having extensive trade deficit. But despite the North Korea's assessment of the effect of the visit of the trip to Trump, he was able to assimilate Asian countries about the dangers of nuclear weapons, which was also one of the main objectives of his visit. Japan, South Korea, China, Vietnam, and other countries with whom Pyongyang has good relations, all agree on North Korea's nuclear disintegration.

But the trump that only emphasized on bilateral settlement for trade, but it is against the policy of important parties like ASEAN and East Asia Summit. The reason for the development of these settlements is that Asian countries want to deal with the multilateral settlement in the region's economic and security issues. He calls on the one-on-one Asian allies to join North Korea on one side, on the other, emphasizing bilateral settlement in the trade-a result of which there is a kind of bifurcation and hypocrisy.

If not blindly, but if he stubbornly maintains bilateral ties in trade, then China will be under the economic leadership of the region, which has already taken multilateral economic initiatives. If the economic leadership is lost in this situation, the role of the United States in other areas, along with the safety of the region, will be weakened.

Taken from Asia Times, Translation: Promote Promotion.