Interesting topic as this came up in another discussion with someone whose running for an open seat in Flint Mi. He hardly stands a chance since he's running in a dominantly held democratic area but none the less he is opting to give it a go. A couple days before the primary he started endorsing one of his opponents for people whom otherwise wouldn't vote for him. He stated if he was to win he'd be open to asking this person to serve with him. He went on to say that if he won he'd be open to more than just one of them. Not that he stands a chance in hell of winning but if some unforeseen miracle happened my opinion would be that miracle happened because obviously people would have been tired of democratic leadership therefore he shouldn't be choosing to take that type of leadership with him. Though the Flint water crisis is still something very concerning to the people of Flint but so is the ongoing violence, lack of vitality, economic growth and the total inability of law enforcement to respond to anything that isn't a high priority call classified as those concerning violence. Democrats have had years to try and solve those issues and have failed miserable so if you have zero chances at winning this and you win I'd think people would be disappointed if you decided to drag along those whom you didn't vote for because winning meant they wanted something totally different in place.