The Most Massive Scandal in US History is Boiling Over
Either Trump is compromised or a large chunk of the government is complicit in claiming so in order to usurp a duly elected president. Neither situation is particularly great.
Support my work via donation:
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Styxhexenhammer666
Makersupport: https://www.makersupport.com/Styxhexenhammer666
My literary works:
Blogger: http://tarlwarwickbooks.blogspot.com/
Wordpress: https://tarlwarwick.wordpress.com/
My other platforms:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Styx666Official
Gab: https://gab.ai/Styx666Official
Minds: https://www.minds.com/Styxhexenhammer
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Styxhexenhammer666/
Steemit: https://steemit.com/@styxhexenhammer
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
If Trump was compromised, there would not be the need for the multi-billion dollar media campaign doing and saying absolutely anything, no matter how absurd, to try and halt Trumps agenda.
There are other reasons, such as the need to conceal Israeli collusion and psyops conducted by Mossad and transnational corporations to directly influence the election in Trumps favor. Psygroup was one corporation that did this, and Mossad turned against HRC because her rabid corruption was leading to them.
Trump is their man.
I wasn't aware of that level of details.
I was aware that there were some generals, or high ranking military, that told Trump that Trump Tower had been under surveillance. That was when the campaign office was moved.
The main thing that I have realized is that the idea of the whole "drain the swamp" is that it can't be just a swamp drain in DC, that would just be refilled within a week after Trump is gone. So, it needs to be a world wide awakening. (Including Israel, but I won't comment more, because that topic is a hornets nest best case).
What happens when you drain a swamp? There is no swamp anymore. It isn't the creatures in the swamp that are the causes of the problems: it is the swamp that draws the creatures.
We can see the creatures that inhabit swamps if we look at any member of Trump's cabinet. The government is the swamp, and is the cause of the concentration of swamp dwelling creatures. Trump now leads that government, and we can see that he isn't draining the swamp, he is - as intended - using it to do things.
Freedom doesn't come from government. Freedom is the antithesis of government.
True; it's just that when the swamp is tied into all the other global swamp lands, you can't just drain one area without more spilling back in.
Trump IS in the middle of the swamp; half of them are still trying to destroy him, a small portion are reluctantly helping (probably so they don't get shot down the drain as well). The thing is, if Trump went in with a ham fisted approach, he could make a dent, but would be killed before anything serious could be accomplished.
As it stands; he's got North Korea on a new path, he's shifted the strategy of tension in Syria to open doors with Russia, Iran is at risk of revolution by a group who is framing a declaration of independence from the Mullahs (framed like the US). The swamp is being slowly drained... even if he needs to be dirty in the process.
You are right, freedom is the antithesis of government. However, with no government is anarchy. So, government being necessary, it must be set to ensure freedom, and for that also requires that the people continuously push for freedom and against the corruption that would take hold to remove those freedoms with the power of government.
I need no governing, as I am capable as any man of governing me. In fact, since I alone am in charge of being me, I am uniquely able to govern me. I reckon you are too, at least I'm willing to take the chance that you are instead of forcing you at gunpoint to obey me.
What convinces you that you are not? Why, absent an armed force that compels you to pay them to enslave you, would your life be harmed?
Anarchy does not mean chaos, BTW. It simply means 'without rulers.' I think you assume that absent armed thugs forcing people to obey them that chaos would result.
What evidence do you have to support this assumption?
Also, you agree that government is the antifreedom.
How can the antidote to freedom be 'set to ensure freedom'?
I submit, it cannot. Light cannot be set to ensure darkness, nor joy to ensure despair. How can enslavement produce freedom?
These are not rhetorical questions, and I am sincere in asking them. You strike me as a reasonable person, and I seek to understand the reasons you have for your statements, which seem unreasonable to me, and I find this confusing coming from a reasonable person like yourself.
It is difficult to address this; in human history, periods of anarchy have always been an in between point marking the collapse of one system before the power vacuum was filled by a new group.
Government is like a fire; it makes a useful tool, but only when kept small and controlled by the people. In those cases it's less a case of being ruled, as having rules that are enforced by the group. It is when it gets out of control that the damage that government can cause becomes all consuming.
A republic really is the closest to anarchism that would be workable.
The story would be different in tribal societies with populations in the hundreds, but even then, history has shown that this will lead to conflicts between tribes.
Jefferson said 'The polity of the indians is that which I admire most, because there is the least of it.'
We can agree on that =)