Why I do not believe in alien conspiracy theories

2018-4-11

First, start with some cosmological background:
Cosmologists, formerly known as astronomers and later as astrophysicists, assume the mass and the volume of the universe to be finite.
I doubt both of these assumptions independently of each other.
It may seem bold of me to claim that they assume the volume is finite, but if you see or hear their answer to the question of what is the difference between a black hole situation and the big bang situation, you will notice that they assume finite volume, or else they allow for an increase from finite volume to an infinite volume, not to confuse with unbounded increasing finite volume.
Now I will give a mathematical proof of how an infinite mass can be located in a finite volume:
In 1 dimension (suppose half closed bounded segment (0,1]) at each point 1/2^n with n assuming values from 0 to infinity, there is a small enough segment (to prevent arguments about whether a positive mass can exist within a point or not) with mass of 1 units. Each segment is of exponentially decreasing length by a factor of 2, or possible above 2.
Obviously, the overall mass over the entire segment is infinite, whereas the space itself is bounded.
This example can be easily be modified to fit higher dimensions than 1 using (Set-Theoretic) cartesian product.
Now assuming d>=2 dimensions, and an unboundedly increasing space.
Assuming that space itself travels faster than light like cosmologists do, and assuming gravity does not pull 2 bodies which recede faster than light from each other, this may explain how such a circle or a near surface of a ball can expand instead of collapse under its own gravity, despite having an infinite mass constrained to a finite volume.

Now back to more mainstream astronomy, assuming the expansion of space, the Hubble Law, etc.,
Even if there are alien life, but it is far enough, beyond the event horizon of earth, such life can not be reached or reach earth, or be communicated with assuming slower than light travel and communication, which is what General Relativity assumes, so such alien life may be irrelevant even if it exists.
Cosmologists calculated using various assumptions, which may not be all true, the probabilities of existence of intelligent life close enough for earth to reach earth and found it to be some positive probability, so it should not be completely ruled out.
So why do I rule it out?
Not because of physical or mathematical or biological considerations, but because promotion of the belief in alien life and UFOs, especially of the hostile kind, is exactly what the one world globalists would want their livestock to believe in.
It can allow them to unite humanity, under their rule against a common enemy.
Perfect for them.
If they had the evidence like some believe, why would they want to prevent fear and panic?
Remember false flags, 9/11, OKC bombing, etc.?
The ruling class achieve their goals with fear and panic, even if such events are not false flags.
So I believe, that if they had the evidence, they would have presented it readily.
Area 51 was and may still be related to operation Paperclip, and other secret stuff, but UFOs are not one of them.
Why would aliens restrict their activities to a certain USAF location, or to any single location?
With the availability and increasingly advancement of affordable cameras, video and stills, some of which having optic zoom, still no recorded evidence in the disposal of the UFO agenda pushers.