RE: Sec S19W1 || Creation of an Interactive Website (Basic concepts of HTML5)
Criteria | Remark |
---|---|
Verified user | ✅ |
#steemexclusive | ✅ |
Free of Plagiarism | ✅ |
AI Article | ✅ Original (Human text!) |
#Club | club5050 |
Bot free | ✅ |
Quality Of Entry | 3.2/4 |
Relevance Of Entry | 2.5/3 |
Accuracy Of Entry | 2.8/3 |
Comment/Recommendation
I really admire your determination and dedication you used to create your entry, you wrote smartly, so therefore your accuracy is quiet good but you really have to learn how to make well detailed entry with broad definition.
• the quality of your entry is ok because despite the fact you gave your answers to your question using attractive markdowns, the entire content is looking scanty.
• Your registration page is looks nice and functional, this because you gave room to collect enough data that an average site would be needing.
• In summary, you showed professionalism by using other tags to make you work look attractive, also I love the fact that you answered all questions correctly. Your presentation is also beautiful because you used nice markdowns to organize your entry
• Thanks for participating.
Total| 8.5/10
Greetings, dear friend. I have a suggestion after reviewing your feedback. It would be better if you don't mention "objective answers" on the spot during the review. The review should be general to prevent students from copying plus additionally to make the result announcement process smoother.
This is just my personal suggestion; whether you agree or disagree is up to you.
Kind regards ,
C.c @kouba01
@starrchris @kouba01
You might want to make your moderation comment more focused on how well the author has met the requirements of your Teaching Team's weekly assignment.
The other points about AI, bots, clubs etc should be secondary information.
The score out of 10 should be related to the quality, accuracy and relevance of the homework task.
Ok boss we will work on that as soon as possible, thanks for the feedback.
Thanks a lot for your reviews.