You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A material has been found that will superconduct in your kitchen refrigerator!
Well, they are liberals, so I could call them Evil, but that is redundant.... Scatterbrained is just restating the obvious. Pseudo-Science is giving them too much credit! Jackasses is just an unintended slur on their parentage. Fools is like Evil, hopelessly redundant to call a liberal that.
SO I guess I need to go with Scientific Prostitutes!
>:(
Like I said though, there are lots of patriots repeating the stuff about 5G. Some that I hitherto thought were smart people.
I am much more concerned about the threat to my health from my own Government. That is much more measurable and immediate, than from a 5 watt transmitter a hundred feet in the air!
I will bet you that the relative field strength of the power lines in my neighborhood are ten times stronger than any 5G network.
There are those that oppose all change, not because it is bad, but because it is Change!
>:(Strange. Why would patriot types be so opposed then...?
Hmmm....
I'm going to have to look into this more.
Some people equate frequency (5Ghz) with output power; and it scares them. In fact, Higher frequency actually are harder to generate, so most of the time, it means lower power with higher frequency. Combined that lower power, with a shorter penetration that accompanies higher frequencies; and it should be significantly safer.
Strange things....
:)Hmmm. OK. Thanks.
https://www.electricsense.com/12399/5g-radiation-dangers/
Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:
Let’s not also forget that in 2011 the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radio frequency radiation as a possible 2B carcinogen.
Our bodies suffer damage every day from sun, cosmic energy, contaminants, stress, poor food, and a hundred other stressors. Our Bodies attack and destroy cancer several times a day. We only get cancer, when the body fails to kill the damaged cells.
I just wonder how they were able to remove all these other stressors to normalize their data, before they came to these conclusions. I have seen the same data they use to support man made global warming used to predict an Ice age 40 years ago.
These are the same people that claim that theairport scanners running 100 times the power are perfectly safe, and cause no damage. They want it both ways, and if they are correct, The Hams I know should be dropping like flies, not getting older than dirt!
Look up Diathermy treatments. They also have 80+ years of History of safe use, and they use RF as a deep heating agent, with enough power to raise local body temperature.
I would like to see how they ran the study, and especially how they controlled the stressors. Otherwise the entire list is just normal ageing products. I am gun shy, because I have seen so much paid for science, and the Human body is such a complex organism, we only understand tiny pieces of it.
>:(Very good reasoning! You've got me leaning your way now.
No, just pointing out holes in their analysis. I take herbals for several of those stressors, because they are products of normal ageing.
I just worry that they are blaming the Boogie man of the day.
:'(