For a community it is important that users share content respecting the content policies of the platform, i.e. avoiding plagiarism, spam and copyright infringement, but in case it does not happen, each of them must have a team that fulfills the function of reviewing each of the contents to corroborate its authenticity, here is where the #Steem-Watcher detective team plays an important role.

The #Steem-Watcher detective team accompanies communities interested in maintaining a content review plan, for this purpose, has selected each of its members "detectives" to one or two communities in order to meet this need.

_Pixabay

I, being one of the detectives, have the commitment to accompany the World Of Xpilar and Project-Hope communities to review the content that is shared in them, every day between 20 to 30 publications are reviewed through different plagiarism detection tools.

This week 6 cases of violation of the content protocol were detected, all related to the World Of Xpilar community, 2 of the cases are plagiarism.

Below I share with you the cases detected during this week of review generated in World Of Xpilar.

_{World Of Xpilar Adm by @xpilar}

#	Date	User	Post	%	Note
1	26/05/2023	sirkussirkus51	Link	Link	Copyright infringement
2	27/05/2023	samiuzzaman	Link	Link	Plagiarism
3	27/05/2023	vik24	Link	Link	Copyright infringement
4	28/05/2023	faizann	Link	Link	Plagiarism
5	30/05/2023	avra	Link	Link	Spamming
6	30/05/2023	suresh4114	Link	Link	Repeat Content

The World Of Xpilar community has maintained a good activity, being above 300 active publications during the week, the contests have been the main content promoters. As for the use of the Booming program, WOX has established the strategy of giving a maximum of one Booming vote to a user in order to support most of the contents published in this community. On the other hand, the local account @worldofxpilar continues to be a good support tool for users.

Regarding the Project-hope community, it shares good content on economics and cryptocurrencies, most of its users share their content on various platforms. PH is not part of the communities within the Booming program. The local account @project.hope also provides good support for good publications.

_{Project Hope Adm by @crypto.piotr}

In the Project-Hope community, no publications with irregular content were found.

Highlighted Cases.

Among the most outstanding cases, we have @samiuzzaman who has presented a publication using content from various internet sources, including images, in total there were 3 sources he used to give body to his post.

Publication link.

Source		Miniature
Here
Here
Here

Another striking case is that of @faizann who presented in his content several paragraphs taken from an external source.

Publication link.

Source		Miniature
Here

Search Tools.

Plagiarism Detectors	AI Content Detectors
quetext	openai
etxt.biz	zerogpt
plagiarismchecker	gptzero
plagiarismdetector	contentatscale
check-plagiarism	Paraphrasingtool
prepostseo	Crossplag
smallseotools

To conclude my report, it is necessary to point out that in each case identified, I leave in the comment a link to the @abuse-watcher publication where some information and advice on plagiarism and abuse is shared.

I appreciate the confidence of the Steem-watcher team, we are at your service.