For that penultimate paragraph you'll be burned at the stake, @rok-sivante. Hahaha. Seriously, I think that the human being in his usual contact with others, will always seek his peer, the being more like him and that one way or another share their concerns. It's the same with reasoning. There are valid arguments that nobody buys, that they refuse to accept; as there are others that please and are accepted from the first moment. All this because in one way or another it resembles what you think or want to think. I must admit that in the first instance any opinion contrary to Bill Gate's honorability seemed to me to be a "sin". But that has changed. I took him off the pedestal and I see him as an ordinary human being, but with a lot of money. It is true that human beings often take sides, but they are also willing to change their minds. At this moment, some arguments convince me and others do not. Greetings to you. ;)
For that penultimate paragraph you'll be burned at the stake, @rok-sivante. Hahaha. Seriously, I think that the human being in his usual contact with others, will always seek his peer, the being more like him and that one way or another share their concerns. It's the same with reasoning. There are valid arguments that nobody buys, that they refuse to accept; as there are others that please and are accepted from the first moment. All this because in one way or another it resembles what you think or want to think. I must admit that in the first instance any opinion contrary to Bill Gate's honorability seemed to me to be a "sin". But that has changed. I took him off the pedestal and I see him as an ordinary human being, but with a lot of money. It is true that human beings often take sides, but they are also willing to change their minds. At this moment, some arguments convince me and others do not. Greetings to you. ;)