Rules That Defy Logic
The other day, I was at the supermarket check-out counter waiting in line to pay for the stuff I bought. The guy in front of me wanted to buy a packet of cigarettes. The cashier replied that she couldn't sell it to him because he was in uniform. The guy asked if she would sell him the cigarettes if he was not in uniform.
The cashier replied, “Yes.”
“Okay, so I take off my uniform.” And he proceed to strip off his jacket, which has got ‘Civil Defence’ on it. (He had a tee-shirt on under the jacket.)
The cashier smiled and handed him a packet of cigarettes.
I said, “Hey, wait a minute. He is still in uniform. He still has his trousers and boots on.”
Nah.... I didn’t say that. Anyway, the moment he paid for his cigarettes, he proceeded to put on his jacket.
I was like – Really! Did that just happened! ?
I can understand that it is not good for the image for serviceman to be smoking in uniform in public, but not allowed to buy a packet of cigarettes? And the rule was bypassed simply by his removing his jacket?
Was that a bending of the rule through creativity of the serviceman? Or through flexibility of the cashier? Was the rule stupid in the first place? I guess it was just life - people doing what they do best. Getting around obstacles.
On another ocassion, at another supermarket, a cashier was scanning my basket of items when she came to my six-pack – not the six-pack on my abodmen, but the beers in the basket. She asked if that was alcohol. I remember thinking – what a weird question.
“Yes.” I said.
She said, “I am sorry, you have to pay for your beers at the other counters. I am under-aged. I cannot sell alcohol.”
I made her repeat herself so that I would understand what she was saying and what she meant.
And then I tried really hard to understand why is it that an under-aged cashier cannot 'cash-out' alcohol.
All she got to do was pick up the six-pack and scanned it. The alcohol is in the tin, so she didn't even come into contact with it. She was not buying the beer. She was not drinking the beer, she was not selling me the beer like some promoters were selling their wares in the outlet. She is not going to become an alcoholic because she was cashing out alcohol. If it is such a big issue, then she shouldn't be allowed to work. Hmm... puzzling indeed!
Well, I didn’t see the point in arguing with an under-aged girl about a rule she wasn't responsible for. So I just told her to put the beers aside, (that was allowed, she didn't 'cash-out' the item) because I am not going to join another long queue just to pay for them, and I certainly am not going to put the beers back on the shelf for them.
Sometimes, you just have to wonder who set all these rules and if they realized how ridicculous these rules are.
Or am I missing something here? Do let me know if I am, so I can wise up.
Thank you for dropping by. If you like the post, please give it a vote. Follow @quotes-haven if you like humour, quotes and reading about Life.
Cheers!
You might also like my previous posts: -
Quotes on Life
What is Love?
Food for Thought
wee... dustsweeper in action ?
we shall see.
sorry couldn't resist LOL
The alcohol rule (law) is simple - If you are not old enough to consume it you're not old enough to sell it. Yes all she had to do was scan it, but it doesn't make it right. It is more setup for bars to not have underage bartenders and waitress its. EXTREMELY easy for them to sneak a drink then the establishment is responsible for what happens. (At least that is how most countries think) because it's the mentality of the 'let' them.
Yes some laws are ridiculous, but maybe sometimes we don't understand their purpose because they are usually made before we were born or out of circumstance and more than likely are no longer relevant. Just like where I live it snows...can you imagine a law that make snowball fights illegal?? Ridiculous. (of course it's not strictly followed) Or a law that prevents you from collecting rain water, because it will cut into the profits of the water companies. (It doesn't but someone thinks it does)
The problem is that she can not sell something she does not own . The beer is not her's to sell . If it went to court she would win but the problem is that who wants to go through the BS to get it overturned . It is however a direct result of the caliber of people making the laws
Bar tending is a total different issue .
OH that is very true, I did forget about that.
I just wanted to make a comment to you and reference it on front page LOL and maybe a little upvote .
Thanks for your comment. I guess you are right. Maybe at one time, the laws were needed and useful, but are now not applicable.
The funny thing about this is the obstacle people are trying to get around. It's like somebody just went through a lot of trouble to put a large obstructing rock in the path, and everyone now has to walk around it. Why did they put that rock there? How is it helping anyone? And if it is just in the way, why not just remove it? Instead, somebody will come along with another rock to fix people walking around the first one. So everyone now has to walk around 2 obstacles.
Yes add the lawmakers place the additional rocks in a slight arc, so slight that from our perspective it is un-detectable. Over time we are en-circled. This is how we loose our freedoms and liberties.
I actually saw that yesterday in an episode of Brookly Nine-Nine.
Thanks for the intro to Brkln9-9.
Yup, this about sums it up. Makes you wonder right. How come the people writing the rules did not see the error ( the right word escapes me ) of their rules.
Thank you for dropping by. Exactly, why is the rock there? when it doesn't serve any purpose. Anyway..... :-)
I never understood that alcohol rule either.
haha... I am glad I am not the only one. :-)
Congratulations @quotes-haven, your post has been selected by the @asapers for a resteem and a feature in our brand new curation post. Issue 59
What does this mean for you? Well first an upvote from some members of the team, we are no @curie or @ocd but who is going to be unhappy with some extra upvotes. Also each post featured in the article will receive a 10% share of the SBD generated from the curation post.
Keep up the great work and please consider supporting the @asapers with an upvote and/or a resteem on the post you feature in. Please wait seven to ten days for payout.
Your friendly @asapers
Giving back A.S.A.P
P.S. I love that you can make a post out of a visit to the shops, I think I need to get more creative. You do know that you can use up to 5 tags, maybe motivational or writing etc as additional quotes. :) @insideoutlet
Ah I see now where all the extra votes are coming from. I am pleasantly surprised. :-) Thanks to you @asapers for the resteem, the visit and also for your nice comments. Yes, I am aware that I could use up to five tags, but my mind was at a blank at the time of posting and couldn't think of what else to put in the tags. Thanks for the reminder and suggestion. I will bear that in mind. And I will be following you closely. Cheers!
You have a minor misspelling in the following sentence:
It should be occasion instead of ocassion.This post was shared in the Curation Collective Discord community for curators, and upvoted and resteemed by the @c-squared community account after manual review.