The Lie behind the name JESUS

in #jesus • 9 years ago

JESUS - As any scriptural scholar will tell you, Christ's name was "Yeshua", not "Jesus".

Some will tell you that the name change was caused by "grammatical errors", "translation differences", or a litany of other excuses.

The world was purposely confused by Satan, so that no one could invoke the authority of God, through the proper name of His Son, and a "popular name" was given to the uneducated masses in the 17th Century, this name was "Jesus". A look at the King james 1611 Bible shows that the name Jesus was not used at that time.

Open almost any Bible now and you will see that the proper names of Christ and his Father are replaced with; Jesus, God, Lord, etc. This was done on purpose. The letter ‘J’ did not exist in the English language until around the late 16th century.

Lord RayEl could have easily proclaimed his name to be "Jesus", if he wanted to continue the deception, and avoid the controversy, but Lord RayEl insists upon truth in all matters. RAYMOND ELWOOD is his birth name, LEAR is his surname.

#christ #bible #truth
9 years ago in #jesus by
$0.45
  • Past Payouts $0.45
  • - Author $0.39
  • - Curators $0.07
25 votes
Reply 10
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     9 years ago 

    ... And falling on the ground, he heard a voice saying to him: Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?

    Q: Why do you persecute Jesus? Would you prefer him to be called Iesus? Is it really that simple?
    The Latin Vulgate, translated from Hebrew and Greek by St. Jerome, commissioned in 382 AD, very clearly called Yeshua Iesus.
    Was St. Jerome, who knew at least a few ancient languages, wrong in this translation (or transLITERATION if you want to get technical)

    Or is the Church so far off base that even the early Fathers, of which Jerome is one, are too late for you? You need the purest essence of the faith, which you will only find in your leader Ra-El?

    Yes, I use strong words with you guys, because - plain as day - you persecute this Yeshua you claim to follow. I use strong words because I don't want any poor souls with no understanding of the history of the Church, of Scripture, the Church Fathers, or of your particular cult to be hoodwinked into damning themselves.

    Do you use ancient words because you want to appear scholarly, or is your cult simply Gnostic? I'm asking an honest question here.

    Because it sure looks to me that you are merrily persecuting Christ Himself when you write the garbage that you do about the Church. And for goodness sakes, why do you emulate the Catholic Church if not to insult her? I sincerely pray that you and your fellow cultists (or is it Occultists?) soon have your "Road to Damascus moment", when you will see the error of your ways. I hope for your sake that it is soon.

    [-]
     9 years ago 

    Amazing how many times the teachings of Paul actually contradict the teachings of Yeshua the Christ

    you should google it...

    https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Paul+contradicts+jesus&oq=Paul+contradicts+jesus&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l2.9554j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    [-]
     9 years ago 

    The Apostate and False Apostle Paul - Teaching for Tomorrow, stay tuned...

    [-]
     9 years ago 

    So.... when did Paul write? If you don't consider Paul's writing to be of the Gospel, just what DO YOU accept? Ra-el's ramblings?

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       9 years ago 

      You have so much to learn, just as so many typical Christians do, why not go back to the beginnings and study the Aramaic Peshitta, prior to the most Holy Words getting mis-translated.
      So many errors have crept in over the centuries , Satan did a great job on deceiving the masses...
      Try reading the Aramaic peshitta in plain English for a start.

      $0.04
      • Past Payouts $0.04
      • - Author $0.04
      • - Curators $0.01
      3 votes
      Reply
      [-]
       9 years ago 

      Why start there, when it is an incomplete translation BACK into aramaic from the Greek? And it leaves out several NT books? For crying out loud, it even leaves out the book of Revelation, which you lot are so happy to cite.

      If you're going to go on about the Peshitta and Aramaic, then why aren't you Syriac Christians? I think I know: because there is no consistency to your thinking. If you were Syriac Christians, you would be using the entire canon of the New Testament, and you would believe in - for one - the real presence of God in the Eucharist.

      Do you believe in the Eucharist?

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         9 years ago 

        What language did Christ and the Apostles speak, 1 guess, it wasn't Greek, lol

        [-]
         9 years ago 

        Galatians 2 Commentary: (18th Century by Matthew Henry)

        2:1-10 Observe the apostle's faithfulness in giving a full account of the doctrine he had preached among the Gentiles, and was still resolved to preach, that of Christianity, free from all mixture of Judaism. This doctrine would be ungrateful to many, yet he was not afraid to own it. His care was, lest the success of his past labours should be lessened, or his future usefulness be hindered. While we simply depend upon God for success to our labours, we should use every proper caution to remove mistakes, and against opposers. There are things which may lawfully be complied with, yet, when they cannot be done without betraying the truth, they ought to be refused. We must not give place to any conduct, whereby the truth of the gospel would be reflected upon. Though Paul conversed with the other apostles, yet he did not receive any addition to his knowledge, or authority, from them. Perceiving the grace given to him, they gave unto him and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, whereby they acknowledged that he was designed to the honour and office of an apostle as well as themselves. They agreed that these two should go to the heathen, while they continued to preach to the Jews; judging it agreeable to the mind of Christ, so to divide their work. Here we learn that the gospel is not ours, but God's; and that men are but the keepers of it; for this we are to praise God. The apostle showed his charitable disposition, and how ready he was to own the Jewish converts as brethren, though many would scarcely allow the like favour to the converted Gentiles; but mere difference of opinion was no reason to him why he should not help them. Herein is a pattern of Christian charity, which we should extend to all the disciples of Christ.

        Read that last sentence again: "Herein is a pattern of Christian charity, which we should extend to all the disciples of Christ"

        Are you and your cultists Christian? If you say yes, what in the world are you basing that label on?

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           9 years ago 

          Congratulations @prime-cleric! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

          Award for the number of upvotes

          Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honnor on SteemitBoard.
          For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

          If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

          By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

          $0.00
            Reply

            Coin Marketplace

            STEEM 0.04
            TRX 0.33
            JST 0.103
            BTC 64079.78
            ETH 1856.47
            USDT 1.00
            SBD 0.39