What is sexual consent? The truth revealed!
Truth about consent
(DISCLAIMER: If you are a religious person this post will most likely upset you. However, it is the truth. It is based on logic, rationalism and not HUMAN Law. Discrestion is advised after this point. You have to option to not read it at all. The truth is a pill that is hard to swallow and is often bitter. It is for those with ears to hear and eyes to see the truth.)
Preachers are the ones who say it's forbidden, but they have no scriptural authority to base this on, all they have is greed as their motivation, and they use this as just another tool to keep their guilt-ridden paying customers coming back to church.
A "minor" for purposes of sexual consent, is defined differently under the law from one country to another, ranging from 9-21 and some have no legal minimum age at all. Now the obvious question is... "If there is a scientifically quantifiable age when a person goes from victim to willing participant, why do legal ages vary so greatly?". The answer is simple, there is NO science behind it, the orgasm response feels good from birth to death. It is the society that defines when a person should experience this pleasure, not the individual according to the laws of many countries, which should be the red flag that forced abstinence under the law is not consensual.
Let's take America for example... A girl at 17 years and 11 months of age, uses a fake ID to get into a nightclub. She then approaches a 21-year-old man for sex. The man is arrested, goes to prison, and must register for life as a "sex offender", while the girl is treated as a victim, and coddled by society. A month later she turns 18, goes to California to become a pornstar, and has sex with hundreds of men of all ages on camera while being celebrated by American society.
Now, was she somehow sexually matured in a month to such a great degree, that she leaped from victim to willing participant? Obviously no... But American law and society think that's what happens, and they've convinced much of the world to follow their example, and it's all a lie, a legally enforced lie. This is not an extreme example, in fact, since we are using the "pornstar" model, let's look at the recent flood of "child pornography" law enforcement agencies are sounding the alarm about. But who's producing it? The answer is CHILDREN.
They play the same sexual exploration games every generation plays, but they record and distribute it on their phones and computers to their friends. No villain in a van outside the school is to blame, this is the activity of children "enjoying their sexuality". That means they are consenting to their own activities, and police agencies are arresting them for it and ruining their lives, for the same activities they themselves did as children. So what this comes down to is, "What constitutes 'consent' in The Lord's eyes?" Since there is no universally or scientifically agreed upon the age when a person transitions from victim to participant, because of the act when done between mutually agreeing on partners, is "pleasurable" at any age. So if everyone involved is enjoying themselves, and no "harm" is being done.
How is it ethical to place an arbitrary age upon when a person is allowed to experience pleasure? There are quotes around "harm" for a reason, because other than "first timer" virginal pain, the only lasting harm from responsible and consensual sexual experiences, is the harm brought by society, when a person is told the pleasure they had was "wrong", when they are made a "victim for life" through unending therapy, when they are ripped away from their family and friends, and placed into abusive and neglectful foster care "for their benefit".
.jpg)
So understand that pleasure is always a pleasure, and when society says something is wonderful tomorrow, but evil today, but they can't explain to you why? You have an obligation to question for yourself why you believe something is wrong and are you agreeing with the popular belief, ONLY because those around you do?
Finally, none of us are telling anyone to have sex with children, we are simply saying that neither the Bible nor Jewish law ever restricted it, because The Lord knew then and now that "forcing celibacy is abuse" and a child DOES NOT "WILLINGLY CONSENT" to forced celibacy. Satan makes society's modern laws, so, of course, people restrict children from their natural activity, causing them to grow up sexually confused and afraid, all with the twisted belief that "it's for their own good". And because society should NEVER take the oppression of children lightly, I want to add one important addition to the above statement. This is NOT a matter that is based ONLY upon religious belief, this is a matter quantified in MANY scientific studies, and is now a central focus of the United Nations.
Quoting from the famous metadata report published in the APA's Psychological Bulletin entitled "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," that challenged the assumption that sex between adults and children was always damaging to the child. The article, written by Bruce Rind, a psychology professor at Temple University in Pennsylvania, Philip Tromovitch of the University of Pennsylvania graduate school of education and Robert Bauserman, a psychology professor at the University of Michigan, analyzed the results 59 studies on how college students cope with what was classically labeled "child sexual abuse".
According to the authors, the "negative potential" of sexual abuse has "been overstated." The report concluded that "the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from their child sexual abuse experiences." It is the public shaming, lifelong victimhood, and separation from their loved ones that brought them the most pain, the sexual acts, when consensual, are usually reported as "pleasurable". And this understanding is growing around the world, which is why the United Nations is now committed to the protection of children's sexual rights and freedoms... The only strong opposition to protecting their rights is coming from strongly evangelical/puritanical countries like the United States.
NOTE: This has been a hard truth from a logical, rational and God fearing point of view. Not everyone will agree with this or even understand it at all. No I am not saying go have sex with kids. The teaching does revolve around kids but the point is there is NO commandment that says sex outside marriage is wrong. People that quote the 603 commandments better be sure they follow every single one to the letter or risk being judged a hypocrite at the end.