You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steemfield Round 1 Results

in #steemfield5 years ago

{PROPOSAL: ADDITION}

Totem Behaviour

Every round, the Totem must provide a 100% up vote to all Proposal and Vote comments left by players in response to a Totem update which contains a Proposal or Vote.


Basically, the Totem gets mechanically bound to provide votes to the players. Now, before anyone asks, the intention is not for the votes to have to wait until the Totem has 100% VP, it only specifies that it must be a 100%-weight vote. I suppose other details would have to be at the discretion of the Totem unless otherwise defined and other rules or mechanics.

Also, get out there and do a little recruiting for this game. Nothing says people can't jump in at any point – all they have to do is drop the very small delegation. It's early days still and there are very few rules in play or likely to be in the near future.

Go find some people who enjoy thinking about rules and tinkering about with games from the inside.

Sort:  

I had a particularly similar proposal to this haha. I like your variant better so I think I will propose something else.

Part of the fun is working out how you can eloquently manipulate the system three steps ahead to do what you want it to. Or just to be maximally chaotic.

Either way, there's fun to be had.

{YES}

I think it's a perfectly reasonable rule.
Got to have some incentive to play ;)

Posted using Partiko Android

A truly cruel man would point out that we are still in the proposal period and that, technically, voting now before the Totem update with the collated grouper proposals is a rules violation.

I'm not that cruel.

Oh, I hadn't seen that there were different periods for voting and proposing. Darn.

Technically wouldn't that just mean my above comment just doesn't count as a vote, rather than being a rule violation ?

There's no rule against agreeing with a proposal, even if that agreement is expressed using the voting syntax, is there ?

Posted using Partiko Android

I suppose, technically, it doesn't count as a vote – so you may be onto something there. Up to the Totem it in this case because it is underspecified.

There is absolutely no rule against agreeing with the proposal, discussing a proposal or engaging with the proposal – as those things are completely unspecified.

(Honestly, this would only be worth being a stickler over in a truly cutthroat game or if there were automated tools reading the comments and parsing them into some sort of easily managed front end for the Totem. As far as I know, those tools are not completed yet so it's not that big a deal.

It's fun to rib you over, though.)

It's fun to rib you over, though.

😂

Touche sir !

Posted using Partiko Android

I don't think there is anything in the rules that says you can't cast pointless votes during the proposal phase. An example of a rules violation would be something in direct conflict with the rules like voting twice during the voting phase or submitting multiple proposals or try to giveaway LAND they don't have.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.37
TRX 0.12
JST 0.040
BTC 70162.45
ETH 3540.43
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.79