Twitter Cleverly Denies Shadow-Banning, Then Subtly Admits It

in #censorship6 years ago (edited)

Twitter continues to deny shadow-banning on it's platform, despite recently being caught tampering with politic visibility on content on it's platform, hiding conservative profiles from being visible in search results.


Source1, Source2

Twitter's legal/policy lead Vijaya Gadde and product lead Kayvon Beykpour recently defended Twitter and the non-shadow-banning claim by playing word games. Then they admitted they essentially do shadow ban:

People are asking us if we shadowban. We do not. But let’s start with, “what is shadow banning?”

The best definition we found is this: deliberately making someone’s content undiscoverable to everyone except the person who posted it, unbeknownst to the original poster.

We do not shadow ban. You are always able to see the tweets from accounts you follow (although you may have to do more work to find them, like go directly to their profile). And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology.

So, because they define shadow banning as content that is not able to be seen other than by the person who posted it themselves, anything they do to make content harder to discover isn't shadow banning... Give me a break!

They admit they employ methods that render following people for the their content useless. Saying you have to work to find content, when you were supposed to be getting it because you already followed someone to get their content, is a shadow ban of making someone's content less visible less discoverable.

Having to go directly to someone's profile to get their content makes following people pointless, and that much harder to even get to. WHo is actually going to go verify all the people they follow to make sure they are getting the content? What a waste of time!

How would you even know they have put out content for you to go see? Are you going to go check up on 500 people each day to see if they posted something? NO! That's the whole point of a follow feature so that you don't have to do that! Why have a follow "feature" that doesn't work, that doesn't have people's posts/tweets pop up on your feed for you to see?

Anyways, Twitter employees have already been caught on camera admitting they try "to get shitty people to not show up"


Source

HIDDEN CAMERA: Twitter Engineers To "Ban a Way of Talking" Through "Shadow Banning"

They talk about how the aforementioned definition of shadow baning used to be in place, although it may not anymore. This was back in January 2018. But just because someone's posts aren't being seen despite being able to post (the "official" shadow banning definition Gadde and Beykpour gave), doesn't mean Twitter hasn't changed things up to bring in a different level of shadow banning, as they have done and have been caught doing to conservative personalities.

Twitter policies and algorithms are admittedly used to promote a political agenda, which is anti-conservative, and as such also anti-libertarian considering how it it's perceived to be towards the Right.

Instead of the more severe shadow banning, the covert form is what which has been uncovered recently, which is to downrank conservative voices which upranks liberals. This was mentioned in December 2017 as being in development. Now it's been proven to be in effect.

What Twitter is doing could be a form of Federal election tampering. of Congress. Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. thinks what Twitter is doing is a campaign finance violation because conservative are being treated differently on Twitter which affects donations they can receive:

"The evidence is piling up that I am being treated differently on Twitter than people on the political Left and I don't like that because I enjoy the Twitter platform, I enjoy the engagement, I enjoy the candor. So, I believe that Twitter may have illegally donated to the campaigns of my opponents by prejudicing against my content."


Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.


References:


If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
Follow me for more content to come!


My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.

Sort:  

Thanks for the great post! Social media censorship is out of control these days and the ways the go about it are so crazy... Ever since my YT channel was taken down during the Parkland purge, I've never gotten a single video up to even 200 views on either of my 2 new channels, and during the month after the Parkland event when i was regularly making videos before being banned I regularly got thousands of views on some vids and hundreds of views was pretty typical. It seems the algorithms are working well to censor specific users without deleting their accounts.

I'm pretty sure they're also manipulating view counts on YouTube as one recent video exposing White Helmets I uploaded (it was a mirror from another user) registered 146 views after 2 days up, and then after a few days dropped to 4 views! I wish I had gotten a screen shot to prove it - oh well.

I also see many users with a hundred thousand or more subscribers regularly getting under 10,000 views a video. It makes no sense. Blackstone Intelligence also recently had some shadowbanning of his comments on his YouTube channel as well... All sorts of methods they employ to censor the truth beyond simply deleting content and users. And it's all the big social media, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google, showing these corporations are controlled by the same ones who control the government.

Thanks again for covering this - resteemed.

Yup, it works well. Then ppl cant get the viewers, info doesn't get out, so they move on I guess. They know how to drive people away by restricting access of their info to viewers. A free marketplace for truth is hard to come by :/ You're welcome. Thanks for the support :)

They are trying to muddy the water so to speak.

The truth is that Twitter is not shadow banning anyone.

The employee agents of twitter are doing that, and also committing fraud by doing so.

People need to get back to the basics of what is factually occurring here.

Twitter does not exist in the world as a cause.

The agents do exist as a cause in the world.

Start throwing the cause of the fraud in jail and you will hear an entirely different tune.

People who speak on behalf of the organization called Twitter, referring to the general operations the grouping order construct called Twitter, rather than by individuals. It's simpler to do so. People speak of Google, Facebook, government, which are all grouping orders of many people who act under a common organizational structure. I get what you mean though.

Yes.

If you are a living being than you are committing acts. If the entity, person, principle is a paper tiger and there is no living body than such cannot under any circumstances commit a crime. This doesn't stop the agents from committing crimes. The individual is required for the paper tiger called Twitter to operate, because a paper tiger cannot do anything.

Thus it makes sense that you go after the people that are committing the acts that create the crime. It is a crime called false advertisement to induce living beings to use your products, goods or services under false pretenses. For instance you cannot advertise that you are connecting up the world and than cut off parts of that world for any reason. If you do it is fraud.

If you are a programmer and you know that the entity, person or principals are paper tigers and you know that they have made such a claim. Making a program to cut off part of the world is complicity to the original crime, fraud. So you go after them too. The truth is corporation are paper tigers and the crimes that are committed are actually committed by individuals. Obviously they do so for some advantage.

Liberty, Freedom require that people be responsible for their individual acts. Seeing as Twitter is a paper tiger than it follows that some living breathing being must have committed an act that is allowing the crime and harm to society. The real problem is that we are accusing things of committing crimes when things cannot commit crimes. Twitter is ink on paper and a thing. The programmer is a living breathing being and if the acts he commits result in crimes than he is guilty if he knows they have advertised connecting up the world and works on a program to do exactly the opposite, how could he not know a crime was to be committed?

That is who you go after. In the case of Twitter all of the board members and I bet some of the investors knew what was going on. That knowledge without reporting it creates the conditions for a charge under the law as co conspirators. If I was the attorney general Twitter would have a upper management problem that would most likely put them out of business.

This was the same crap Fakebook pulled a few years ago that made me stop using them. I was following the Bundy Ranch standoff and they quit letting it show in my feed. I missed over a week of updates until I went to their page and saw they had been updating daily. Since I wasn't on their to get fed liberal thoughtspeak, nor help the women who are narcissists get their 1000th you go girl/you are beautiful on their selfies I stopped using them. Logged in some time back when the analytica thing came out and deleted it.

I deleted Twitter a few years ago when it made news they were banning some of the conservative accounts.

Hehe yeah, it sucks what they can do to limit our access to what we want to see. Lame shit. I only got on twitter to share steemit posts. Never got why it was so popular... 125 characters... wth

Upvoting and resteeming. Its quite possible that all these mega social media sites are also working in collusion with Media Matters/David Brock in order to censor dissenting voices. The levels of censorship are growing worse day by day. More info here:

Leaked David Brock (Media Matters/Share Blue) Internal Confidential Strategic Plan On Fighting Trump/Rightwing

https://steemit.com/news/@clarityofsignal/leaked-david-brock-media-matters-share-blue-confidential-strategic-plan-on-fighting-trump-rightwing

Thanks of the support. Yeah Brock is implicated with Hilary in a lawsuit by former White House Secret Service Agent Gary Byrne.

Are these guys running for office? Their political double speak is on par with the best politicians.

The echo chamber on the left is getting so vast it’s unreal to think of.

LOL :P They know how to create confused double speak indeed.

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 150+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 10

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

I've been posting for years on twitter and have not had any comments or likes on any of my posts and I've got many thousands of posts

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 62062.59
ETH 3002.04
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.77