Clever technology vs. Stupid people

in #technology7 years ago (edited)

It seems almost scary how many people repeats the thoughts of neuro-theolog Manfred Spitzer that technology makes us stupid. Yes, we may be more dependent on it. Bit the issue isn't that men are leaving their work and women stop caring for the children because of technology.

Information without control

logo.jpg

So many people repeats the thoughts of a sixty year old therapist without understanding how many crazy and simplifying theories came out of sixty year old psychiatrists, starting with psychoanalysis that convert most of art into penises and vaginas and ending with the socialistic theory of higher emotions (those were the „correct“ emotions that made people run under a tank with grenade) The thing is, watching something happen and interpreting it are two very different things.

I do have one huge advantage compared to Spintzner, I‘m not a outsider – I come from the generation of children who voluntarily switched from the outside to computers. And at that time computers were solely for nerds.

Originally technologies were quite elitist and with a few exceptions like gaming, were very demanding to know what you are doing. And it wasn't until the internet became a big thing that brought the social aspect to it that masses adopted technologies into their daily lives.

And that is the base of what bothers Spitzner and conservative people in general. The modern thinking that somewhere out there is factually correct information. You no longer need to learn a map, because you have it in your phone and somebody is keeping it updated. This „somewhere“ and „someone“ is uncertain and it makes them really angry. Instead of using the information certified by either the government or a big company you can consume an incredible amount of not very censored information on-line.

Uneducation?

Humankind isn't different because of technologies. It doesn't degenerate because of them either, just some of it traits are getting more attention thanks to it. What may seem as an inability to focus (also known as ignorance or uneducation) is just a much quicker absorption of a much higher amount of information, with which teachers are yet to learn to cope with.

In reality it opens the door for a completely new way of education based on giving talented people the option to give them just the basics and let them find the rest themselves. This is a wide opened space for someone who will reject the current dogma and will try to teach using this never-ending fast stream of information.

It doesn't destroy the old and nor does the old lose its relevancy. You just need to understand how probably will some of the old information be used. And the ones that are less probable, like the „SAS Survival Guide“ or „How to hunt using only tools made from a tree“ need to be shrank into a small compact manual and we must hope that they will never have to be used by the future generations.

Sort:  

Hi @kralizec

Your post has been selected for possible nomination on our daily feature.

Please reply to this comment if you accept, and are willing to let us promote your gem of a post! By accepting this, you have a chance to receive extra rewards and one of your photos in this article will be used on our compilation post!

Check out @ocd -- learn more about OCD (transparency is key) and see other Gems!

hey man, you know I wouldnt mind ;)

Technology is reassuring but worrying at the same time. The new artificial intelligence developer by Google or IBM are scary. Imagine what a day more intelligent than us. That would be the end.

Not necessarily, we just need to have good safeguards. I think the one I liked the best so far is first putting these future AI into more and more "real" simulations and whenever they do something that would seem threatening to humanity, just punish (or even kill) them until they are never sure that the reality they are in is real so once they get into the "real" reality they learned that misbehaving will result in punishment/potential erasure.

But in order for such a looming threat against an AI to have an impact on the decisions it makes, wouldn't it first have to have a concept of self and a yearning for self preservation (possibly coupled with a fear of termination)? You can teach a computer to do things, you can even teach it to learn by following certain observational algorithms, but it's quite another thing to teach it to have a social conscience.

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by Kralizec (Jakub (James)) from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, and someguy123. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you like what we're doing please upvote this comment so we can continue to build the community account that's supporting all members.

This post has received a 10.98 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @kralizec.

Superb! Thanks.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 59056.49
ETH 2597.22
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.44